A quick note on The Science.

The Janester was interested enough in the origins of the term "demisexual" to research yesterday. As far as anyone can tell, it was coined by a teen in a role-playing forum, describing themself or a fictional character as neither "slutty" nor chaste.
(2) Pressure from online communities resulted in the adoption of the term by WebMD, etc. Now, there are multiple citable papers/chapters discussing the rise of the term, and debating what it means + whether this is a real identity (i.e. "Demisexuality as a Contested Sexuality").
(3) The majority of Woke Science is of this kind. Robin D'Angelo makes a statement in a popular book. This author/idea are then cited in the qualitative Conclusions section of a Sociology paper.

"Scientific evidence" of "white fragility" now exists. Why do you hate science?
(4) It's worth breaking this down for two reasons. 1st, this stuff collapses when subjected to EMPIRICAL analysis. What are the odds that whites would be more "fragile" than (say) Black Americans, if asked standard questions about how angry racially awkward interactions make us?
(5) Also, "the science" behind DEI debates isn't like the science behind Physics. ~Every paper noted so far traces back to 1 kid in the RPF.

The idea "non-experts" can't critique this is odd. Is the claim that Ben Shapiro OR Tim Wise just isn't SMART enough to get a MA in Soc?
(6) "Why don't you make these arguments offline?"

**I do. My audit studies piece is coming out in a month or so, I'll be at the next MPSA, etc.

"Why don't MORE serious heterodox folX?!!"

**See attached numerical graphics.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wilfred Reilly

Wilfred Reilly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wil_da_beast630

23 Jun
As a methods prof, a lot of the social science done or cited - especially by journalists - to "prove" contemporary Wokish talking points seems almost intentionally badly done.
(2) An example would be the claim single parents do as well as married couples at raising kids, IF YOU ADJUST FOR INCOME. Maybe. But, 2 people make more $$$ than 1, and men out-earn women. You'd have to make ~220% what the mean single mom does to be as stable as the mean couple.
(3) On a different note, 3+ complex "Bayesian" analyses of police shootings look at B:W risks of getting shot by cops, and find ratios of 2-3:1. However, none adjust for the B:W difference in victim-reported crime rate, which is 2.4:1, and totally explains the gap.
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
(2) My thoughts...

The most basic thing we can do to help the poor is provide them the services we do everyone else. The hood is UNDER, not over-policed, and should have officers to match and BREAK the crime rate. Poor kids need schools with smart teachers, or vouchers to leave.
(3) I also don't mind - although a few hurrrd-right wing haters nationally do - state services targeted specifically at POOR (as vs, say, "bisexual bi-POC") people. Enterprise zones, CLASS-based affirmative action, IQ-boosting programs like ABCdarian, etc. all can do good work.
Read 4 tweets
15 Jun
There were four major college-campus hate crime hoaxes basically last week.
"Prove it!!!"

Ok. While, more specifically, it's the TRIAL here that's happening now, the dorm fire - like, probably, most of the other hate incidents at - Vitterboro U was a hoax. thecollegefix.com/black-student-…
(3) The "noose" reported at Central Connecticut State U on Memorial Day, and discussed for days, turned out to be a crane cable...literally ON a construction site. fox61.com/article/news/l…
Read 5 tweets
19 May
Illegal immigrants should, as a general rule, be deported.
(2) There are a few exceptions, i.e. real asylum claims, but the intentional conflation of invited immigrants with un-invited immigrants banned by law ("A path for EVERYONE!!!") is yet another thing that would have been utterly remarkable to ~everyone until very recently.
(3) No hate for hard-working foreign citizens who technically aren't supposed to be here. I'm an aggro-nuff person, and would 100% sneak into a richer state if I were (say) a journeyman carpenter.

But, I wouldn't expect THEIR COPS to support me in this amoral personal mission.
Read 4 tweets
28 Apr
Actual racism has declined 80-90% since the 1960s, but the level of media/activist focus on this problem has remained stable or even increased, largely for economic reasons.
(2) "Where'd Reilly get them numbers (?)," pt. 1.

Anonymous professional polls asking people about their level of support for racial segregation, inter-racial dating, etc. are conducted literally every year. The attached shows changing levels of support for inter-race marriage.
(3) "Where'd Reilly get them numbers (?)," pt. 2.

However, data-mapping resources like Elephrame indicate that (per most 1960s baselines I've seen), 'anti-racist' activism may be increasing. There have been 5,799 BLM protests alone since 2014 or so...elephrame.com/textbook/BLM
Read 7 tweets
11 Apr
Reading the @ManhattanInst report on U.S. race relations, from @epkaufm (media4.manhattan-institute.org/sites/default/…) is fascinating- if depressing. As I've noted before, we don't seem to be facing any measurable increase in racism whatsoever, but instead a moral panic about it.

Some take-aways...
(2) First - while that troubling 6-8% core of bigots we see in housing rental, etc, remains a problem - racism empirically is WAY down. Per page 9, only about 10% of whites object to inter-race marriage on well-done anon surveys, and 17% of ALL marriages are inter-racial.
(3) But, people don't know this. Per "Key Findings," 8/10 Black Americans and 6/10 liberals whites believe Black men are more likely to be SHOT BY POLICE than killed in auto wrecks.

That's insane. For context: there are ~50K fatal and 600K disabling/injuring wrecks per year.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(