There are ransomware oligarchs who's "job" is to manage ransomware hackers and make sure they only hit targets that Putin would permit, or explicitly direct them to targets Putin desires. They provide the hackers needed resources and they collect a cut.
The hackers themselves are a mix of those who are greedy and ambitious — let's call them the GRU track — and those who got in too deep and are coerced into serving the oligarch. The latter are the disposable assets that are more likely to end up getting caught.
Those who get caught are unlikely to know the oligarch that was sponsoring them, and anyway would probably prefer prison to what they fear from the oligarchy.
The point here is that the goal needs to be finding the oligarch bosses and shutting them down. This solves the ransomware problem, pisses off Putin, yet it keeps the response ostensibly apolitical.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We all know the old saw about yelling "fire" in a crowded theater.
What about yelling "There is non fire" in a theater that's burning down?
And for those into the deep nuances of the first amendment, purists will say you actually can not pass a law against yelling "fire" in a crowded theater, because that's prior restraint. This is correct.
Would tend to agree, *EXCEPT* that prior to this slogan, police reform *always* meant more money for police education. Only after this slogan, did people talk about serious police reforms, like who responds to what kinds of calls to 911.
Email was designed as a decentralized distribution and storage system. While that same fundamental system exists today, most of us get our email form providers of monolithic service sites, like gmail, with proprietary storage and internal exchange protocols.
The web is the ultimate decentralized service. Yet Google managed to put a monolithic service on top of it (the search engine) that became essential.
It's stunning really. On October 1 2018, Trump basically says in public that he's blackmailing a Democratic Senator. And on October 5th and 6th Manchin is the sole Democrat who votes with Republicans to end debate, and to confirm Kavanaugh.
Manchin would go on to vote to confirm Barr, and now states clearly that he will neither end the filibuster, and will even block the For The People Act if it comes to a vote.
But sure lets spend all of our time and political will trying to convince him to switch his vote.