It's kind of crazy that Autumn Jackson, who threatened to tell the press that Bill Cosby had raped her mother to conceive her, wound up getting 26 months in federal prison.

Just a little less than he did.
Oh I missed this but apparently her conviction was also reversed. The jury was never told that her request for money had to be wrongful to be criminal, only that it had to accompany a threat to his reputation.

law.justia.com/cases/federal/…
I wonder, in hindsight, whether those prosecutors feel they prosecuted the right person for the right reason.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2…
For the record, I'm not saying that Cosby's conviction should not have been reversed. It absolutely should have been.

But I am saying that it's interesting how, at the height of his powers, the government went out of its way to shut down threats to his reputation.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Fleischman

Andrew Fleischman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ASFleischman

9 Jul
Twitter literally never promised to be neutral. Image
It's not a "free speech platform" it's a clubhouse. You agreed to a bunch of stuff to get to use it for free.

And if you don't like the agreement you made, tough.
Here are the terms of service. Here is how many times you can find the word "neutral" and "free speech." ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
8 Jul
John Yoo with the hottest takes.

But, charging someone who knows the President with a crime probably does not do permanent damage to the Presidency.

nationalreview.com/2021/07/how-la…
Again, Yoo at no point shows how this harms the Presidency. Some state people asked for Trump's tax records. He claimed absolute immunity. He lost.

But Yoo doesn't seem to think Trump should have won that?
Did opponents of Trump use litigation in an "unprecedented way" to stop his agenda? Maybe for a very specific definition of "unprecedented," but we literally just had our third SCOTUS opinion about the ACA joined by every conservative AG in the country.
Read 9 tweets
7 Jul
36 pages deep, you find COUNT ONE of the complaint against Facebook, which is that it is violating the First Amendment. Image
Count Two: Also please say section 230 is unconstitutional and don't use any words that rhyme with landing Image
And as far as legal claims go, those are it. It was extremely considerate of the former President to file a lawsuit that can be dismissed in a one page order.
Read 4 tweets
30 Jun
Bill Cosby is who he is but prosecutors are not entitled to renege on agreements when it becomes inconvenient.
Quite literally promised him immunity so he couldn't plead the 5th in a civil case, then tried to innocent kid whistle their way out of the agreement as soon as it became politically inconvenient.
It honestly reminds me of Heath v. Alabama, where Georgia offered a man life in prison if he'd plead guilty to a crime, and then conspired to use the plea to have him executed in Alabama because he crossed state lines to commit the crime.
Read 5 tweets
30 Jun
In a lawsuit that claims a teacher was so offended by a student's failure to recite the pledge, or write down its words as part of an assignment that he began to mistreat the student, it's a bit rich for a judge to write that "folks are just so easily offended these days"
The teacher gave a long, weird speech about communism and sharia law and sex offenders.
Then, the student says he was just sort of consistently a jerk to her, and when she complained, he played a bunch of weird Christian music in class and stared at her.

And he kept doing this stuff even though the administrators were asking him not to.
Read 13 tweets
30 Jun
ADM valued a grain plant at 4 million dollars in 2016. But shortly after Sonny Perdue was selected to be the Secretary of Agriculture, it agreed to sell it to him for 1/16 that price.

Perdue then did not disclose the sale.

washingtonpost.com/climate-enviro…
Perdue then had his company, AGrowStar held in trust as an ethics measure. The company was sold for 12 million dollars, which included a now significantly more valuable grain plant.

Perdue did not disclose the sale because it was held in trust.
The trustee then chose not to keep any of the money from the sale of the company, instead, simply giving it to Perdue. Perdue also did not disclose that.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(