Zoe Watts has been convicted and jailed for making homemade bomb and weapons. It is widely known that Watts was born male and now identifies as a woman. The birth sex of Watts would have been easy for a journalist to find /2
There is plenty of public domain information available, including previous reporting by other newspapers. Watts has also run transgender awareness courses for the police. By making their trans history public Watts also makes their male birth sex known /3 lincolnshireunison.org/assets/downloa…
There was no clarification elsewhere in the article that Watts identified as transgender. It was completely unnecessary to refer to Watt's sex (or even gender identity) in the headline and should have been omitted to avoid misleading readers in this way /4
Misrepresenting the sex of the offender in this story has a material impact on the understanding of a story. The central point of the story, as summarised by the headline, is that a female person has been sent to prison for possessing weapons. Most people in prison are male /5
Most people in prison for possession of weapons are male (97%). MOJ offender statistics show that in March 2021 there were only 10 female prisons in England and Wales convicted of possessing weapons compared to 314 male prisoners /6
It is a fact, evidenced by official statistics, that it is rare for a female person to be convicted of possessing weapons. Most stories of this type will involve someone who was born male and not female /7
Misrepresenting this news item as if it was one of the rare examples of a female sent to prison for weapons possession distorts public opinion about criminality patterns in the UK and changes the central point of the story /8
It turns a common-place story about a male person going to prison into a rare and unusual story about a female person going to prison
The use of the word "female" in the headline breaches Clause 1 on accurate and misleading reporting and should be removed from the headline /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
**NEWS THREAD**
Tomorrow the Supreme Court will hear an appeal to force UK gov to record X on passports. This would be a first step towards state-recognition of non-binary identities. If the appeal is won it threatens women's sex-based rights. Here's why/1 fairplayforwomen.com/non-binary-the…
In April, Fair Play For Women instructed barrister Jason Coppell QC to seek permission to intervene at the Supreme Court. You can read our full submission to court here /2
We argued that refusing X on passports is justified because of the wider impact on society and in particular women's rights. X conveys the ideological message that humans can be sex-less. That some people are neither male nor female. Sex isn’t universal. This matters because.../3
@GBNEWS@AskNic "nobody is arguing that transgender prisoners shouldn't be in women's prisons because they are transgender, its because they are male. There are reasons we keep other males out of female prisons and all those same reasons apply to males who identify as women" /2
@GBNEWS@AskNic "The judge has decided...that we do need to consider the rights of transgender women - even if they are sex offenders - to live alongside women. Although its lawful I think we need to ask ourselves as a society is it right" /3
The high court has today ruled that the MOJ's transgender prison policy to house's high-risk male-born transgender prisoners in female prison is “capable of being operated lawfully" /1
However, this judgment highlights serious inadequacies in the way the prison service counts transgender prisoners. This is something @fairplaywomen first highlighted back in 2017. Improvements will now be required. Prisoners with a GRC will now be counted for the first time. /2
The judgment also finally puts to bed the transactivist claim that "Trans rights and female rights are never in conflict".
The court was clear that the decision to house male prisoners who identify as women in female prisons DOES undermine the rights of female prisoners /3
In March 2021 a judicial review was heard after a female prison brought an indirect discrimination claim on the grounds of sex. Her legal team argued that two transgender policies do not adequately consider the detrimental impact on female prisoners and should be quashed /3
This morning @BBCWomansHour had transwoman Joanna Harper on to talk about the science behind whether its fair for male-born trans athletes to compete in female category. You can list to a clip of the show here /1
@BBCWomansHour Tl:dr from JH = "Paucity of data" and "Transwomen retain muscle strength and are stronger that ciswomen"
@Emmabarnett "So when the IOC made this decision they are basing it on nothing then?" "Can it be deemed correct if it's not based on evidence?" /2
@BBCWomansHour@Emmabarnett JH "The Olympics take place every 4 years and they needed to make rule on transgender athletes - so they needed to do something - we had 25 people meet in 2015 and we reached a consensus that this was the best way forward"
EB: "But based on what if you haven't got any data?" /3
We were back on @GBNEWS this morning talking about trans athlete Laurel Hubbard qualifying for the Olympics. This time alongside Joanna Harper; the transwoman who advised the IOC to open up the female sport category. Here are some clips /1
@GBNEWS How come some types of trainers get banned on the grounds of fairness in sport but 20 years developing on testosterone does not? /2
"If anyone's watching this and doesn't think it's unfair probably doesn't think women's sport is very important" /3