People here were more concerned about someone saying 'Chinese virus' than the fact the CCP government let this thing spread across the entire world, lied about it, shifted blame, then had their whole country back to normal in months. By magic.
LMAO.
That's some Sun Tzu stuff.
Nobody even asks how China got back to normal so quickly. Prior to any vaccines being available in other countries.
And our 'journalists' don't ask these basic, obvious questions.
What a joke. 😂
The reason why Trump kept calling it 'Chinese virus' and 'Wuhan virus' was to remind people of where it started... To keep that in the public consciousness.
But nah, people have goldfish memories now and would rather be 'politically correct'.
Insane.
It's all madness.
-1.4 BILLION people
-Epicentre of the viral outbreak
-Massive elderly population
-Densely packed cities
And nobody has any questions?
Amazing.
Honestly... The CCP leaders must be laughing their nuts off for the whole past year.
I've never seen such a finesse. It angers me, but I respect this level of intellectual warfare. 😂
Tip one domino and let the enemy destroy itself from within and blame itself.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I just want to remind everyone that if you'd all said 'no' to the lockdowns and mask mandates (like I suggested over a year ago), then all of this nonsense would have ended by last summer.
And no, everybody wouldn't have died...
The totalitarian litmus test was failed.
And virtually nobody wants to acknowledge those of us who warned EARLY about how this would inevitably lead to rolling lockdowns, incoherent restrictions, and the normalisation of governmental overreach.
People always like learning the hard way.
Wish I'd been wrong.
Now, we have politicians, media pundits, and public 'health experts' all over the world who are drunk off their own power and don't want to relinquish it. They love the control. And they've become richer in many cases.
It is concerning that providing FACTS that could potentially discourage someone from taking the rona jab, is considered 'anti-vax' or 'spreading misinformation'...
Why is informed consent being actively discouraged?
This makes me even more skeptical about the situation.
Before taking any medical treatment: from vaccines, to pills, to surgeries, the potential patient should be as informed as possible about the potential benefits and potential risks.
Short and long term. Objectively.
This is basic ethics and should not be discouraged.
Even more peculiar is hiring influencers, celebrities, etc. to promote a medical product, with NO MENTION whatsoever of potential adverse effects, despite there being so many.
I personally believe this is unethical and reckless.