There remains literally no evidence whatsoever that “wokeness” — whatever that even means — is harming Democrats. But white media men keep writing these stories suggesting that the critical weakness of the party is its reluctance to condone racism
We are watching, in real time, a bunch of white guys, massively overrepresented in media and politics, even among nominal liberals, attempt to start a narrative that all this thinking-about-race-and-gender stuff has gone too far. Not hard to see what’s happening
The political leanings of communities of people are HEAVILY guided by the demographics of those communities. Top tier political media is an area run completely by middle-aged white men. Shocker of shockers, come to find out they all think that Democrats take racism too seriously
Ultimately the reason they all kind of sound like Trumpy Republicans is that they share the most important determinant of Trump support with most of the GOP’s base
Here’s the other thing that seems so revealing to me: how many countless articles like this are going to be written without ever defining what “woke” is or where the boundaries lie? Seems pretty important!
Instead ALL of the analysis adopts this winking “you know what I mean” approach. It’s just assumed everyone is on the same wavelength, that it’s obvious when people are being unreasonable. The other place you see this? Rooms full of white dudes, talking privately

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Will Stancil

Will Stancil Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @whstancil

10 Jul
A fundamental divide in our politics: Republicans just say, directly to voters, why the voters should pick them over the other side.

Democrats set up elaborate indirect demonstrations of their argument, almost all of which voters end up overlooking.

politico.com/news/2021/07/0…
Passing bills and hoping voters will see your accomplishments? Indirect: you're expecting voters to notice and then pick you.

Letting the GOP seethe and obstruct and hoping voters will see how unreasonable they are? Indirect: you're expecting voters to notice and pick you.
Trying to improve real economic conditions for voters? Indirect: you're expecting voters to notice you did it, and then pick you.

Implementing new programs that will benefit voters? Indirect: you're expecting voters to notice you did it, and then pick you.
Read 11 tweets
9 Jul
Extremely astute point from @brianbeutler, which is that it's entirely too convenient that "wonks who are extremely invested in the details of good policy" have now decided that "the details of good policy" is ALSO the best way to win elections. What are the odds..?
The belief that policy wins elections has survived a fusillade of counterexamples - most recently and notably, Biden's stimulus. It should have been Dems' crowning glory; most presidents can only dream of passing a bill so large and popular. But it's had no real political effect.
Of course, in some sense, this belief is unfalsifiable - it's a frame of interpretation. If Dems do better than expected next fall, pundits will say "Seems voters like Biden's policy achievements!" If they do worse, pundits will say "Looks like Biden's policies were unpopular!"
Read 6 tweets
8 Jul
Okay, here’s my question: if you believe the “extreme manifestations” of contemporary civil rights and racial justice rhetoric are easy to separate from the more reasonable and traditional manifestations, are there any major ideas endorsed by MLK that you still oppose today?
And if yes, do you believe you would you have criticized King in 1967 prior to his death or not?
Can you cite some major national civil rights or racial justice advocates directly and unreservedly promoting these ideas? (Slides from random DEI trainings don't count)
Read 7 tweets
8 Jul
Not to repeatedly belabor the obvious, but “CRT” is just being used as a catchall code for “literally anything related to race that makes a white person feel bad.” It’s a way of pretending all those parts of history or politics are something separate from the I-have-a-dream parts
White conservatives have been running into an issue, which is that they are substantively losing on racial justice and civil rights. The public is increasingly against them. So they’re trying to divide off all the stuff that people find uncomfortable and attack only that.
A QUICK GUIDE TO CRT:

The parts of the history of race in America where the good guys win and everything works out in the end = not CRT

The parts of the history of race in America where white people are villains, problems are not solved, and they persist to the present = CRT
Read 4 tweets
7 Jul
It seems like a party dedicated to winning the culture war, rather than avoiding it, could make hay of the GOP's straightforward support of mob violence, constitutional disorder, and insurrectionary anger?
"Ashli Babbit had it coming" is not a hard case to make.
Anyway, notice how the endorsement of force in defense of the liberal state takes elevates emotions a little? These are the tools conservatives use. The reason the insurrectionary far right makes such a good culture war foil is that it lets liberals use them too.
Read 5 tweets
7 Jul
Some reporters keep reporting Republicans saying "Yeah haha we're just trying to delay this thing as long as possible to sink Biden's agenda" and then other reporters turn around and report "Republicans are still undecided on this bill, for reasons" with a totally straight face
What if the "linkage" to reconciliation bill - which was publicly discussed throughout the negotiations - is not the actual reason the GOP is backing away from the bipartisan bill
The GOP literally just played this game with the Jan. 6 commission - asked for a bunch of conditions, was given them, and then backed off the bill anyway. We're going through the exact same process and yet, incredibly, some reporters think the issue is the substance of the deal?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(