UK now has the most restrictive immigration laws in its entire history @wallaceme

American journalists understand that - why don’t you? 1/3
From its creation in 1801 until 1962, the UK had no legal controls on free movement from the British colonies / empire to the UK, when *limited* controls were introduced 2/3
On 1 Jan 1973 UK ended this partial free movement for the colonies, and replaced it with free movement for the EEC. Until 30 Dec 2020. 3/3
PS. UK does still allow free movement for Irish citizens, and has extended it to those arriving from outside the British/Irish isles.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Cox

Simon Cox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SimonFRCox

24 Jun
PSA: if my cat keeps coming round your house - don’t take him to the vet to see if he has a chip, just stop feeding him.

His glossy coat and friendly demeanour yells “second breakfast”

Second time I’ve had to schlep to the vet to collect him.
tempted to go on my bike but reckon the vet might not hand him over
@andraswf gonna scooter
Read 5 tweets
17 Jun
Everyone granted leave to remain under UK’s EU Settlement Scheme is told by the Home Office that the “leave is issued in accordance with … the Withdrawal Agreement”. So is Colin right here? 1/
This is Home Office’s formal notification. 2/
The Govt says (correctly) that the WA didn’t compel the UK to grant leave to all the people who have it under EUSS.

But the WA gave Member States the power to waive the residency requirements of the WA. 3/
Read 14 tweets
5 Jun
Law can be complex, but much complexity is avoidable, done by lawyers maybe well-meaning to “protect” clients from it / don’t want to use limited resources explaining. But egalitarian, public interest lawyering means making law comprehensible & accessible.
I know that very often my clients don’t think they will “get it”. But when I take time to explain it - they often do. Ofc, explaining may have to go beyond the law, to the motivations / biases of Gov decision-makers and judges. +
I spent time yesterday apologising to a client about how, a long time ago, when they were the partner of a client I didn’t take the time to make sure they understood the legal arguments we were making for them. +
Read 16 tweets
3 Jun
Napier Barracks was deliberate. Immigration Ministers deliberately created a shortage of dispersal accomm during the pandemic, then used that as an excuse for urgently placing people in a barracks. Without safeguards.

Speed and lack of planning was the plan.
In March 2020, senior civil servants urged Ministers to use the pandemic to drop their policy of allowing local authorities to veto placing asylum-seekers in empty flats and houses.

Ministers didn’t accept that advice. +
Instead, Ministers used their powers to create new temporary accommodation sites - regardless of local authority wishes.

Suitable for stays of days at most, asylum-seekers were forced to stay for months. +
Read 4 tweets
2 Jun
1 million people just left the UK. And it wasn’t because they care about vERy HiGh iMMigrATion.
There’s no data linking relative high levels of immigration to worsening housing. House building in recent decades in UK (and many other places) depended on immigrant labour.
Housing, green space, public services are determined primarily by Gov regulation and spending. Levels of immigration are irrelevant. Compare high immigration Luxembourg, Switzerland & Netherlands with low immigration Greece, Portugal and Croatia…
Read 4 tweets
25 May
In Sept 2020, Home Office Ministers started to evict 000s of former asylum-streets to destitution - on to streets or sofa-surf at the height of the pandemic.

For 7 months @gmlawcentre & @dpg_law fought back thru the courts blocking all evictions.

Today Home Office backed down.
In October 2020, working with @_A_S_A_P, @gmlawcentre persuaded the Principal Judge of the Asylum Support Tribunal these evictions threaten everyone’s public health - winning a “landmark” decision that all judges have followed since. +
When the Home Office refused to back down, @gmlawcentre brought a High Court judicial review of the evictions, asking the court to urgently block evictions of destitute people. +
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(