The list of things that are failing in the UK is growing:
- The NHS
- Education
- The justice system
- Social care
- Defence
- The police
The government’s planned response is to cut spending and make things worse. How and why do they think that will work for us?
The government says that taxes will have to go up to pay for better public services. There is no evidence that this is true. Last year more than £300 billion of government spending was paid for by newly created money, provided by the Bank of England. Why not carry on with that?
Those who object to the government creating money to pay for public services say that’s because it creates inflation. It hasn’t for goods, services and wages. It has for shares and house prices. So why not tax wealth more in that case, and have the services we need as well?
The government is clearly planning tax rises to punish those asking for better public services. But how much of that extra tax will be paid by the wealthy? They already have by far the lowest overall tax rate on income and gains in the UK. Why shouldn’t they pay more tax now?
One of the biggest consequences of the government deficits created to pay for Covid has been that the wealth of some private individuals has increased rapidly. Rising share an house prices reveal that. We need to tackle this inequality because it’s destructive of society.
The best way to tackle the rising inequality and resulting division in society that Covid has been creating in the UK is to increase wealth taxes and the taxes on the incomes from wealth and gains.
The wealthiest underpay tax in the UK. They pay capital gains tax at roughly half the rate of income tax. They pay little or no national insurance on their earnings. They get massive subsidies for their savings and pensions from the state. It’s time to change all these.
The wealthy also own most of the UK’s private companies. They’ve had massive tax cuts in the last decade and which are now enjoying a £25 billion tax give away on money they send on capital equipment, whether it’s useful to the country or not. Companies should pay more, not less
The wealthy also own most buy to let properties. That’s OK, but social housing would be better. And better still, they should not get tax subsidies to do so when those renting those properties are struggling to make ends meet. Those subsidies have to go.
What else do we need if we are to have the fairer, more equal, properly funded, stable priced, accessible and optimistic society we need? A government that is honest about how is funded, about what public debt really is, and about who should be taxed would be a good start.
There’s more on these themes in my ebook ‘Money for Nothing and my Tweets for Free’, downloadable here. taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2021/05/0…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardJMurphy

7 Jun
The time for pretence is over: the reality is that the UK is facing another Covid outbreak at least as serious as that earlier this year. This has massive economic consequences. So, a thread on what we need to think about this time.
First, the Treasury has to realise we lockdown to protect the economy. We don’t do it to harm it. We lockdown, provide support and accept the costs because the alternatives are worse.
What’s worse is not just in lives lost, or blighted by long Covid and racked by concern, although they are all bad enough. The alternative is bigger economic cost resulting from health care created chaos.
Read 61 tweets
5 Jun
Let me get the good news on the G7 tax plan on the record. It is historic, it's a step in the right direction and it definitely is going to upset a lot of tax havens and some companies. So let's mark that up as a plus for tax justice. But then....a short thread
The 15% minimum tax rate is far too low: it should have been at least 21% and maybe more. The OECD average tax rate is around 25% and so this is a big concession to the low tax countries, including the UK and its tax havens
Next, there are many accounting problems in what has been announced. Who is defining profit margins? Is it one year or over time for example? And why 10%? That brings some pharmaceuticals in but leaves Amazon out. Is that what was intended?
Read 9 tweets
31 May
I know that I am not alone on the left in wondering how, if ever, we might get rid of Tory rule in England, and so the UK as it now is. I am also far from alone in wondering why so many on the left are so determined to keep them in power. A thread....
The UK faces a vast range of problems right now. That I am aware of no issue that we face has an answer that requires smaller government, more privatisation, more discrimination and less care. In other words, there is no Tory answer to any issue that we face.
Despite this there is a widespread feeling that the Tories are in power to stay. It may not be Johnson, of course. Whether it’s Covid, Brexit or one corruption scandal too many that does for him I don’t know. But what is sure is that those who rise through scandal fall through it
Read 25 tweets
29 May
The new independent adviser on ministers’ interests, Christopher (Lord) Geidt gave two rulings yesterday. Both suggest that he is unfit for office...a thread.
In the first case he suggested that Boris Johnson did not break the ministerial code when having the prime ministerial flat refurbished. He suggested that Johnson was simply ‘unwise’ to allow the refurbishment without considering how it would be funded.
The project was initially paid for by Lord Brownlow, a Tory donor, and the Conservative Party. Geidt appears to have satisfied himself because Johnson, eventually, declared the arrangement.
Read 17 tweets
22 May
I remember the Bashir Diana interview. I remember thinking it weird that this almost unknown guy got it. But I also remember thinking she was pursuing her agenda. And now others are using it for their own agenda.
On a scale of 1 to 10 the BBC’s failings on this came in at about 3 compared with the 7 out of 10 for the tabloids on phone hacking, and the people involved in that survived.
Much more important though is that the current government comes in at 10 out of 10. Organised corruption is their crime, plus indifference to tens of thousands of deaths for which they’re responsible, about which they lie, persistently.
Read 6 tweets
16 May
The government is denying it, but the scientists are seemingly sure about the fact that we are facing another wave of Covid 19 infection. Reopening as planned could see hospitalisations at a rate greater than that in January. A thread on the consequences, and questions ….
Given that the government has get every stage of Covid management wrong my bet is that the scientists are closer to the truth on this issue than the government is. The likelihood that, yet again, Johnson will dither and cost the lives of tens of thousands is very high.
Like almost everyone I was looking forward to summer. With a second jab due soon, I wanted to be optimistic. But I am not. As with the Spanish flu, the likelihood that two waves is not the end of this story is now very high.
Read 45 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(