Starting to think this guy might need to be on some sort of watchlist. ImageImageImageImage
Like, dude. We laugh, but this shit is chilling. My man here is practically outright stating his desire to slaughter people and see a fascist in power. This is Nazi Germany shit.
Now imagine how many others think like him that we don’t know about.
I’m growing more confident the United States will erupt into violent mass civil strife in the near future. Too many people like this have too much bloodlust. I hope it doesn’t happen, but this fucker is welcome to come get a taste if it does.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Phipps, The Most Important Man in the World

John Phipps, The Most Important Man in the World Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GameDadJP

13 Jul
"John how could you say Trump and the GOP are a greater threat to America than 9/11 was?". Well, because I know what I'm talking about. But I realize that doesn't do much for the critically stupid, so let's address that and try to jolt those brain cells to life.
There is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that 9/11 was the worst terrorist attack in modern American, and indeed world, history. Before that, the worst was the Cinema Rex fire in Tehran, Iran in 1978 in which 422 people were killed.
But anyone trying to conflate the death toll of a singular act of terrorism with a broader threat to American democracy has literally no idea what they're talking about. Quite simply, AQ was

never

ever

EVER

going to topple American democracy. Ever.
Read 15 tweets
3 Jun
So, let's examine this through the lens of someone who actually knows what he's talking about. I've spoken at length before about terrorism and what it is/isn't. Not surprising that someone from The Blaze wouldn't know. So, let's go!
When we talk about "terrorism" we aren't talking about tossing a brick into a laundromat or punching someone. Terrorism encompasses things like kidnapping, hijackings, executions, hostage-taking, mass casualty events, etc to instill....y'know....terror.
While there isn't one globally-accepted definition of the word "terrorism", it's roundly accepted that it involves everything I just mentioned. Remember that, because we'll come back to it.
Read 16 tweets
1 Jun
So, putting on my COIN hat for a moment, this is how I see the buildup to the next Trump insurrection happening. Yeah, it's hypothetical and no, it may not happen. But it's already happened once; to think with certainty it won't again is shortsighted and foolish.
If I had to wager a guess: Trump smells an indictment coming. That's the reason we're hearing all this "reinstatement" stuff suddenly. He knows or strongly suspects it's coming soon, and he thinks he can twist it and use it as a means to either protect himself or seize power.
He's going to use that indictment as "proof the Deep State is trying to prevent my reinstatement in August" or "they're trying to take your vote away" or "they're afraid of the truth" or something similar. "THIS is the only way the Socialists know they can stop us!".
Read 17 tweets
18 May
So, I hate to share this, but as someone who actually knows what he's talking about I feel compelled to correct the Congresswoman on a few things.

The Capitol riot on January 6th was insurrection, and the people involved were insurgents. The BLM protests were not. Why? Well.....
(BTW this comes from a nearly twenty-year career in Counterinsurgency theory and practice, both in training our allies and practical application in two theaters of war, so I'm not just whistling dixie out of my ass)
An insurgency is a violent uprising by unlawful combatants against a constituted government, with the aim of overthrowing/supplanting that government. But wait, what is a LAWFUL combatant? Article IV of the Geneva Convention defines lawful combatants by four criteria:
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(