Are the requirements of free movement law for sufficient resources and comprehensive sickness insurance indirectly discriminatory against disabled people?
CJEU, new cases II
Asylum law: what's the impact of the pandemic on transfer of asylum seekers under the Dublin system?
CJEU, new cases III
Can the transfer of asylum seekers be challenged on the grounds that the Member State which the asylum seeker will be transferred to will remove him/her to an allegedly unsafe non-EU country?
CJEU, new cases IV
Does the refugee law rule of protection from persecution on grounds of political opinion apply to corruption in a non-EU country ?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've updated my collection of Brexit litigation re the judgment on the NI protocol - also recently updated re other cases too (Welsh govt challenge to Internal Market Act, EU citizens' status in the UK, Western Sahara group challenge to UK/Morocco FTA): eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/p/litigating-b…
Today's CJEU Advocate General's opinion on benefits for EU citizens with pre-settled status is now available in English - curia.europa.eu/juris/document…
First, it's not solely about EU citizens in the UK, but would apply to EU citizens who have moved between the remaining Member States too.
Secondly, it concerns equal treatment for benefits for those who are lawfully resident on the basis that national law treats them more generously than EU free movement law requires them to as regards lawful residence.
Some points on the Commission's letter to Hungary re its LGBT law
First of all, it's not explicit what the next step would be, although it's implied that the next step would be infringement proceedings against Hungary, if the law enters into force.
On the substance, the letter is carefully drafted. Yes, the EU Charter provides for non-discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, but the Charter, as confirmed by case law, applies to Member States only where they are implementing EU law.
Hence the need for the Commission to argue that the Hungarian law would affect free movement of services and the EU's e-commerce and audio-visual services Directives.
New judgment: Non-EU countries have standing to sue in the EU courts, where they meet the criteria for other natural or legal persons to have standing: curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/do…
In this case, Venezuela has standing to sue against EU sanctions.
Some points:
- this doesn't mean Venezuela has won its challenge on the merits; this was purely about standing, and the case on the merits remains open
- this isn't limited to foreign policy sanctions, ie UK, US etc could challenge trade measures if they meet standing criteria