1) OK, here’s a drunk thread (as in I’m in a pub and currently drunk) / guide for picking a Premier League club to support if you’re not from the UK. N.B. I’m from the US so no regional ties to any club; Tottenham chose me in 2008. ...
2) Let’s get the obvious out of the way. On the one hand it’s easier to follow a rich superclub (Chelsea, Man U, Man City, Liverpool) because their marketing reach is huge, so if you’re abroad they’re present in a way that, say, Crystal Palace are not. ...
3) (N.B. I said ‘are not’ and not ‘is not’ bc British take clubs as a noun in the plural, whereas US would say eg ‘Crystal Palace is winning...’). I digress...
4) On the other hand it’s kind of annoying if you have the privilege of just picking a club and you take the easy route and pick one of the superclubs. I feel like it’s less meaningful to become a City fan now than to have been one when they were shit. ...
5) That unpleasantness out of the way, some people take a kind of geographical / cultural affinity approach. For example, I’m from Pittsburgh so I have a soft spot for Sheffield clubs bc steel cities. But that brings me to another consideration...
6) If you pick a club that’s not really a mainstay in the PL / top division, you could find it difficult to find streaming access to matches of your club gets relegated. So, you could go all-in for Norwich (Nor-itch), but they could be relegated, so be careful. ...
7) By the way, would you want to wear yellow and green??? Again I digress. No shade @ Norwich, Oliver Skipp is a Tottenham player. ...
8) So in general I’d go for a club that’s likely to hold position fairly consistently in the PL—bc unlike US sports leagues the PL has relegation, where clubs who finish bottom 3 go down to the lower league and are replaced by top clubs in that lower league—but not a superclub...
9) Once you narrow things down that way, you have a lot of nice options which might suit your interests and personality. For example, I’ve always been a talented fuck up prone to disappointing myself and others, so Tottenham Hotspur called my name and I answered. ...
10) I love supporting a club (say ‘supporting a club’ instead of ‘rooting for a team’) that constantly let me down while tantalizing me with hope of greatness. It’s just like someone has externalized my depression into a football club. Amazing! Digressing again...
11) So those are the general guidelines; here’s the lightening round:
Tottenham, West Ham, Leicester, Arse*al, Leeds, Everton, Villa are all pretty fun to watch, can pay decently for talent, have ambition, and have a lot going going for them. ...
12) Wolves, Palace, Southampton, Brighton...you like to live dangerously. ...
13) If you have questions about individual teams I’m happy to answer. Another thing: it’s hard to make analogies w/ US teams bc again relegation system makes like the lovable Mets or whatever a bad analogy since the Mets can’t be sent down to AAA if they have a bad season. ...
14) The only other thing I’ll say is fuck Arse*al.
But Saka is the man, love for him, and fuck racists ✌🏻 /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The anti-Critical Race Theory panic comes in large part from Intelligent Design Theory (IDT)—people who don’t think evolution is true—and has adherents in the anti-vaxx conspiracy movement. These people are against science.
The reason they openly admit that what they’re calling CRT isn’t actually CRT is that they don’t believe in facts or truth. They are anti-science, anti-fact, anti-truth.
1) Here's a short thread combining thoughts on @CT_Bergstrom et al recent warning paper about the potentially catastrophic impact of ad-driven social media, algorithmic search, etc. *and* ... what's going on with 'critical race theory':
2) In particular I'm concerned about the possibility that many if not most adults' intellectual life is strictly in the form of reading and responding to online bullshit on Twitter, FB, etc.
3) By 'intellectual life' I mean time and energy dedicated to thinking through ideas and their implications. I worry that the social media effects we all talk about for being bad--misinformation, disinformation, filter bubbles, amplification, etc. ...
1) A searching thread on how to advocate for people in less advantaged positions than mine. I.e. I’m asking for *your* thoughts and advice, no matter who you are, not offering mine. The issue that prompted this for me is …
2) I read as approachable in a lot of ways but also as someone with the privilege to stand up to people. [Both are for the most part true.] So I’m a go-to person for a lot of students and contingent colleagues who’ve been ignored by those who are supposed to hep them. …
3) I also have a very particular sense of justice, bordering on pathological, which means I honestly relish righting wrongs. I mean, I wrote a book on Don Quixote and that wasn’t an accident. But here’s a snag:
1) Here are some context notes about the tenure review process for journalists and others commenting on the @nhannahjones case. Observing these might help reduce confusion and misinformation:
2) The substantive academic merit case for tenure is decided by a committee typically called something like 'tenure and promotion' or 'promotion and tenure.' It's widely regarded as the most challenging, arduous committee to be on bc of how extensive and rigorous the process is.
3) At larger institutions that committee makes recommendations after a similar process happens at the level of the department or school (school of journalism, of engineering, etc.). But in either or both cases, the recommendations of such committees are where the substance is. ..
The poll questions are very poorly designed. This is one way to get Frankfurtian bullshit with data, i.e. polling designed without truth as its objective. Touting this poll is straightforwardly irresponsible.
'Inherently' introduces an unnecessary confound: One could agree there's structural white privilege (much closer to the claim of mainstream CRT) and disagree that such privilege is 'inherent.' Those are substantial conceptual differences not registered in the data. Total failure.
Similarly, dealing in absolutes (as below) introduces a catastrophic error into the question: One could view race as a very important component of identity to study in school *without* believing it's 'the most important thing about [a person].' Fail.
1) Some thoughts about faculty governance in higher ed. and being in the position to change things for the better. ...
2) Actually governing and running a college is complicated and a ton of work, much of it the kind of work that too many faculty look down on. I say this based on ...
3) my first year as a dept. chair, hiring, writing staffing requests, managing the curriculum, &c &c and having now served on committees for reevaluating the college core curriculum, for developing free expression policies, for developing first-year orientation and ...