The Rage Quitter Cancel Cult has outdone themselves again.
The most frightening aspect of this story is the journals willingness to violate its own code of ethics to lay sacrament to the vax god.
churchmilitant.com/news/article/v…
The most frightening aspect of this story is the journals willingness to violate its own code of ethics to lay sacrament to the vax god.
churchmilitant.com/news/article/v…
https://twitter.com/waukema/status/1414706160524046340
Still waiting for a coherent argument for retraction. All arguments seem to stem from correlation isn’t causation.
Or the database isn’t trustworthy.
Fair point that would induce word smithing not retraction according to the journals code of ethics.
Or the database isn’t trustworthy.
Fair point that would induce word smithing not retraction according to the journals code of ethics.
The fact that the Adverse Events Database isn’t trustworthy, isn’t the authors fault.
The fact that people insist the jab is safe while admitting the Database is broken is cognitive covidissonance.
Why else collect the data?
The fact that people insist the jab is safe while admitting the Database is broken is cognitive covidissonance.
Why else collect the data?
The other captain obvious complaint on the data is that death after vax doesn’t guarantee its death from the vax.
No shit Sherlock. That’s what we’ve been saying about COVID qPCR for a f*cking year and you’ve ignored it, and locked down the world anyway.
But now it suites you!
No shit Sherlock. That’s what we’ve been saying about COVID qPCR for a f*cking year and you’ve ignored it, and locked down the world anyway.
But now it suites you!
The reality is that death after the 1st jab is predominantly a few days after the Jab. This time clustering implies causality as random death wouldn’t be time biased. Also the types of death match spike protein symptoms and the age distribution doesnt fit the coincidence story.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
