The Rage Quitter Cancel Cult has outdone themselves again.

The most frightening aspect of this story is the journals willingness to violate its own code of ethics to lay sacrament to the vax god.…
Still waiting for a coherent argument for retraction. All arguments seem to stem from correlation isn’t causation.

Or the database isn’t trustworthy.

Fair point that would induce word smithing not retraction according to the journals code of ethics.
The fact that the Adverse Events Database isn’t trustworthy, isn’t the authors fault.

The fact that people insist the jab is safe while admitting the Database is broken is cognitive covidissonance.

Why else collect the data?
The other captain obvious complaint on the data is that death after vax doesn’t guarantee its death from the vax.
No shit Sherlock. That’s what we’ve been saying about COVID qPCR for a f*cking year and you’ve ignored it, and locked down the world anyway.
But now it suites you!
The reality is that death after the 1st jab is predominantly a few days after the Jab. This time clustering implies causality as random death wouldn’t be time biased. Also the types of death match spike protein symptoms and the age distribution doesnt fit the coincidence story.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Kevin McKernan 🙂

Kevin McKernan 🙂 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kevin_McKernan

14 Jul
The Credibility Trap.
When you want things to be true, you are most exposed to getting burned.

Let's examine the David Martin video that is going viral and see if it passes a few sniff tests.
Here is his dossier.…
It makes two claims about collusion with the CDC and Ralph Baric.
1)CDC illegally patented the SARs virus
2)Ralph Baric locked up all research on the synthetic versions of these.

Let us look at the CDC patent. Image
CDC patent was filed in the US in 2003 before Myriad case law. This means Diamond vs Chakrabarty set the legal precedence and natural sequence was patent eligible under 35-US-101. This contradicts David’s claims.
Don’t believe me. You can look this up in the USPTO PAIR system.
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!