EFF Profile picture
13 Jul, 7 tweets, 3 min read
One year ago, we launched the Atlas of Surveillance. It’s the largest public database of known police surveillance technologies that have been used across the country. Check it out: atlasofsurveillance.org
Have you used the Atlas of Surveillance to look up what surveillance tech police in your area are using?
Do local police have Real-Time Crime Centers? Face Recognition? Cell-site simulators? Find out at atlasofsurveillance.org!
There has been an alarming increase in the use of unchecked high-tech tools that cops use to collect biometric records, photos, and videos of people in their communities, locate and track them via their cell phones, and purport to predict where crimes will be committed.
Atlas contains a massive amount of data, but its content is only the tip of the iceberg. Journalists and the public must continue demanding transparency from criminal justice agencies.

If you know of new surveillance tech at a police department near you, ping us with details.
The Atlas was awarded a James Madison Freedom of Information Award last year, recognizing its contribution to advancing freedom of information and expression in the spirit of James Madison, the creative force behind the First Amendment. eff.org/press/releases…
After one year, the Atlas has more than 7000 data points on police surveillance used across the US. It’s thanks to our partners at @RSJNevada and funding from @craignewmark Philanthropies for EFF’s Threat Lab that we are able to do this important work. Visit the Atlas today!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with EFF

EFF Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EFF

2 Jul
In Nestlé v. Doe, the Supreme Court narrowed one of the few tools that can be used to bring justice to victims of human rights abuses enabled by surveillance and censorship tools sold by U.S. companies.

eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
The Court held that making “operational decisions” in the U.S. is not a sufficient basis for jurisdiction against a company under the Alien Tort Statute, a law that specifically incorporates international law into U.S. law.
EFF filed an amicus brief warning that governments around the world have relied on U.S. technology companies like Cisco and Sandvine to build the tools of repression.

eff.org/deeplinks/2020…
Read 5 tweets
1 Jul
Victory! The Supreme Court ruled today that California can’t require organizations to hand donor names over to the state, saying doing so threatens groups’ First Amendment rights. We filed a brief with the court making that argument. eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
Groups that challenge or oppose state policies have legitimate fears that members and donors, or their businesses, could become targets of harassment or retaliation by the government itself, we said. @EFF
The court's ruling today was the right call. Everyone should be able to express and promote their viewpoints through associational affiliations without personally exposing themselves to a political firestorm or even governmental retaliation. @EFF
Read 4 tweets
1 Jul
Victory! A federal court has prevented Florida from enforcing a law that prohibits online services from deplatforming political candidates, ruling that it violates the First Amendment in several respects. eff.org/document/netch…
The Florida law prohibited platforms from engaging in content moderation of politicians' speech, privileging their voices over other users. We filed a brief in the case explaining why the law violated the First Amendment. eff.org/press/releases…
As our brief explains, we're no fans of online services' content moderation practices, which often remove legitimate speech and disproportionately harm disempowered voices and communities. eff.org/press/releases…
Read 4 tweets
30 Jun
THREAD:

The built environment of surveillance—in, over, and under our cities—makes it an entwined problem that must be combatted through entwined solutions. To make it easier to see, we've visualized it in a cross-section of the average city block: eff.org/deeplinks/2021…
We've created downloadable, shareable graphics to show how the varying surveillance technologies and legal authorities overlap, how they disproportionately impact the lives of marginalized communities, and what tools we have at our disposal to halt or mitigate their harms. An image of a satellite with the text "Government survean image of a police officer placing a GPS device under a caa person typing, with the text Through programs like PRISM aa scuba diver cutting wires. text reads: Running under groun
It's hard to understand what the many types of surveillance can mean for your daily life—from local and state police, to federal law enforcement, to the growing cooperation between private tech companies and the government.

Share these images to help get the message across. an image of a cell tower, with the text Cell phone towers rea door with an eye on it, with text that reads, "Populaa person's silhouette. they have an ankle bracelet. the textan image of a microphone on a pole, with text that reads, &q
Read 5 tweets
28 Jun
We’re disappointed that the Supreme Court decided not to take up our case challenging the government’s practice of searching electronic devices at the border without a warrant or any suspicion of wrongdoing.
@EFF We sued DHS nearly four years ago on behalf of a group of travelers to put a stop to this egregious privacy violation. While this case is over, the fight continues to defend digital privacy at the U.S. border
We want to thank our partners @ACLU @ACLU_Mass, and of course our clients. Without their commitment to fight for their constitutional rights, this case would not have happened. @EFF
Read 4 tweets
24 Jun
This is an important victory for the free speech rights of public school students. We’re pleased that the Supreme Court recognized that public school officials are sharply limited in punishing students’ off-campus speech, even when it is vulgar.
washingtonpost.com/politics/court…
The Court also rightfully declined to give lesser protection to students’ speech on social media. This is critical, given that public school students, like most young people, use social media to engage in a wide variety of self-expression, political speech, and activism.
In our brief, we wrote that “social media is a central means for young people to express themselves, connect with others, and engage in advocacy surrounding issues they care about.” Justice Breyer acknowledged this in the Court's opinion: A snippet from the opinion. It reads: "the school itsel
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(