A trio of German researchers studying hate speech preserved the entirety of a public pro-Trump Telegram channel between Dec 2016 - January 2021.

Some of the channel members, it turns out, actively coordinated to participate in the January 6 insurrection:
techpolicy.press/pro-trump-tele…
The channel the researchers preserved contains 26,431 messages through January 2021 that represent a “continuously evolving isolated ‘echo-chamber’ discussion, produced by 521 distinct users,” they say in the Journal of Open Humanities Data.
techpolicy.press/pro-trump-tele…
Among the research questions this team was looking at is “how oppressive speech shifts norms of society, retrenching social hierarchies and in particular how social media contributes to that trend and exacerbates it.” techpolicy.press/pro-trump-tele…
Also: the @just_security #Jan6 Clearinghouse now includes a reference to the repository and study:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Hendrix

Justin Hendrix Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @justinhendrix

25 Jun
This week, the Senate blocked legislation aimed at protecting the right to vote, while Democrats in the House created a Select Committee to investigate January 6. I spoke to @hakeemjefferson on anti-democratic forces in the U.S. and the role of technology:
techpolicy.press/hakeem-jeffers…
Jefferson was one of the leaders of an effort by nearly 1000 political scientists to express concern over democratic backsliding in dozens of states where GOP legislatures are pushing limitations to voting rights in the wake of false claims about 2020: newamerica.org/political-refo…
I was struck by the clarity of his assessment of the January 6 assault, just hours after it happened. fivethirtyeight.com/features/storm…
Read 6 tweets
20 Jun
This week, the 20th episode of the @techpolicypress podcast takes on hard problems: first, we have @daphnehk on the regulation of algorithmic amplification; and second @HalSinger takes us on a tour of five new bills on competition put forward in the House:
techpolicy.press/hard-problems-…
I spoke to @daphnehk, who directs the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford's Cyber Policy Center, about her @knightcolumbia essay, "Amplification and Its Discontents: Why regulating the reach of online content is hard." Read: knightcolumbia.org/content/amplif…
techpolicy.press/hard-problems-…
To take a tour of the five new bills that Rep @davidcicilline and @RepKenBuck announced in the House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee this month, I spoke to @HalSinger, Managing Director at Econ One. Hal walked me through each bill and the response to it: techpolicy.press/hard-problems-…
Read 5 tweets
18 Jun
"One thing that’s standing in the way of such a debate is fearmongering by tech companies and their allies. They tend to decry anything that might alter how Big Tech operates as somehow helping China win the future." -@ShiraOvide nytimes.com/2021/06/17/tec…
I want to laud this piece for a few reasons. One, I think this line of argument is actually far more prevalent than might be apparent to a typical informed person. It is whispered in meetings way more than it is discussed in the press. And two, it is massive distraction....
And not just from where the focus of the dialogue about tech should be. The overall narrative around China as enemy distracts us from the massive problems we have at home in our democracy. If America stumbles this century I feel confident saying it will NOT be China's fault....
Read 4 tweets
17 Jun
More than a dozen researchers at multiple universities who study technology, behavior and complex systems believe questions about the impact of communications technology on collective behavior should be regarded as a "crisis discipline," says a new paper: techpolicy.press/study-of-socia…
Noting "the vulnerability of these systems to misinformation and disinformation poses a dire threat to health, peace, global climate and more," they call on researchers and social media executives to take a Hippocratic oath not to harm to humanity. techpolicy.press/study-of-socia…
Citing challenges such as vaccine refusal, election misinfo, racism and extremism, they say “the structure of our social networks and the patterns of information that flow through them are directed by engineering decisions made to maximize profitability" techpolicy.press/study-of-socia…
Read 4 tweets
15 Jun
In a hearing on January 6 insurrection hosted by the House Oversight, @RepMaloney said that “the Committee has obtained documents showing that the social media company Parler sent the FBI evidence of planned violence in Washington DC on January 6." techpolicy.press/parler-warned-…
It was the first confirmation that a social media platform provided the FBI with specific material related to plans by supporters of former President Donald Trump to attack the US Capitol before January 6. techpolicy.press/parler-warned-…
FBI Director Christopher Wray previously did not offer a clear answer as to whether the FBI received specific threats from social media companies in prior testimony when pressed on the matter by @RepSwalwell:
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(