.@Dahlialithwick, mid-righteous takedown of the #Kraken lawyers, suddenly veers off topic, declaring "Tucker Carlson isn’t being surveilled by the NSA", and that that's a "lie" of the same publicly manifest sort that "Biden stole the election" is a lie. slate.com/news-and-polit…
To believe the Big Lie that "Biden stole the election", you need to disbelieve a huge array of public evidence, reviewed by disparate courts, all tending to the conclusion that Biden won.
To believe that "NSA is surveilling Tucker Carlson", you need only to disbelieve NSA.
It's not terribly likely that Carlson is a "target" of NSA surveillance - which is what NSA's denial was oriented towards denying
But frankly, you have to be a fucking rookie in the surveillance world to equate "not a target" with "not being surveilled"
NSA's "targets" are indeed non-U.S. persons. But the law permits NSA to surveil the communications of a target's contacts, and their contacts as well. For Carlson to be under NSA surveillance, he only needs to have ordered pizza from the same place as a non-U.S. person target.
I'd be astounded, given Carlson's extremely wide circle of contacts, if none of his contacts were not in turn in contact with a "target."
Carlson, who doesn't seem super well versed in such things, asks the dumb question, "Did the Biden administration read my personal emails?"
Why is this dumb?
Because:
a) it's very likely that somewhere in the "corporate store", NSA has intercepted emails to or from him
b) there are many layers of nonhuman algorithmic parsing for threats between a given email and a human analyst
so c) this isn't Nixon with an "enemies list", this is tens of millions of Americans dusted with a faint patina of suspicion
There'd be further layers before a given threatening email reached the eyes of anyone who could be termed part of the "Biden administration"
But that doesn't make this "not a problem"
Governments, including ones Biden has been a part of, have targeted journalists
Assange. Atkisson. Greenwald. Nakashima. Rosen. It's a long and sorry history, and it keeps happening, under both Republican and Democratic presidents.
So it's even possible that we'll find out, in a few years, that Carlson was in fact a target.
The non-sequitur assertion that that's a lie, shows only that @Dahlialithwick trusts this government enough to believe Biden's NSA when it says it didn't surveil him
I hope she's right
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This distils something important about the difference between right-wing and left-wing people.
It seems common among right-wing people to care for others in proportion to how much they concretely know them. It's a Confucian model of family first, then friends, then colleagues.
They tend to view the utopian call to care for the welfare or the feelings of people you don't know as at best impractical, and at worst a cover for government to deprive you of resources, or for busybodies to police down to the smallest detail the way you interact with others.
"Don't force me to care" efficiently connects right-wing thinking on immigration, taxes, 'cancel culture', and civil rights.
OK, I've got a little story about how I and my one-year-old son became targets of efforts to disrupt and counter "extremism" in the UK. This involves @XRebellionUK, the "Prevent" program, the Thames Valley Police, and the Wolfson College Day Nursery of the @UniofOxford. Ready?
First, for background: it was revealed in January that the UK police had issued guidance to schools and nurseries to watch out for signs of radicalization among their kids, including involvement in the School Strike for Climate and @XRebellionUKtheguardian.com/uk-news/2020/j…
This is part of the long-running Islamophobic "Prevent" program, which tries to instill "British values" at all levels of the education system, public and private, and impose penalties for not doing enough to "counter radicalization". thecanary.co/uk/analysis/20…
Monitoring @HouseJudiciary hearing on @FBI oversight. Sole witness: Director Wray. Chair @JerryNadler sets 4 priorities: Risk of Russian interference in 2020 elections; failings in FISA app process; investigating white supremacists; & FBI efforts in Kavanaugh nomination process.