Just about to get started on tonight's @ihr_history 'Historians across Boundaries' #HistoriansCollaborate seminar - and a wonderfully international crowd in, from Canada, via Europe, to Australia.
We're looking at historical collaboration has been carried out across the world!
First up, @familyhistorysh ... ah, should have been, but his laptop's just crashed! So Mary Stewart @BL_OralHistory is stepping in - thanks Mary!
Mary's discussion is 'Distant cousins, but somewhat estranged? Family interviews recorded by oral historians & by family researchers'
Mary's talking about intersections between family history & oral history - starting with the very personal: interviewing her mum!
How are family historians using oral history? A key question.
Ethical implications of interviews are coming across clearly - a running theme within the #HistoriansCollaborate discussions.
What can oral historians learn here from family historians, as they think about ethics in ways that oral historians might not be?
The affective dimensions of recordings are important and make recordings a method that we might have a different relationship with to, say, paper documents.
How will future listeners understand, hear and respond to our recordings?
Up now, @TimCompeau on spatial mapping of loyalist migration following the American Revolution - a brilliant collaboration between all sorts of different groups, but family histories are at the heart of it.
And even better, one of the key aims is to get academic and family historians working together more collaboratively. Absolutely on for #HistoriansCollaborate.
Finally on to @TanyaEvans14, speaking at before 6am where she is (eek), on ‘Family history, community & collaborative history projects in international comparison’ - a great way to round off tonight's formal speakers!
Tanya's noted that our panellists tonight *should* have been presenting this work at the conference of the @pubhisint, had ... something not intervened - but it'll happen at some point!
Tanya's made some really important points about how the sorts of public history & collaborative work we're doing are valued - or not - particularly in academic quarters.
How do we make productive & meaningful relationships with different communities, particularly (for the academic angle) with those outside higher education?
Tanya ends on a plea for all historians and researchers of the past to really keep showing what we do and why - in a time of great threat, we need to be visible and work together.
2/15 I'm thinking from an academic & a British context - but we see hints there may be similarities elsewhere (@DrJSchramm's paper, next, is a good fit!).
We're fortunate so many people are interested in railway history - a great advantage over other topics.
3/15 There's a long & rich tradition of openness in railway history, bringing together lots of different types of researcher: amateur, enthusiast, academic, & more.
The @JTransportHist, for example, started off over 60 yrs ago as a mix of amateur & academic work.
If the Uni proposes it, it's necessary - that's the logic?
The business case that's been put forward seems to have some grave holes in it. I can't say any more about that, as I don't want to prejudice that route of challenge. But it certainly appears flawed
It's English, & I'm in History (or whatever) - I'm ok.
At the very best, that's a 'maybe.' But realistically, as we've seen elsewhere - Sunderland, anyone - this represents the thin end of the wedge.
It has implications for all of the humanities disciplines.