Because you just can’t have too many farcical Home Office asylum refusals Image
Another personal favourite is the Bosnian Croat journalist who received death threats while working in Sarajevo, and was refused asylum by the Home Office because “none of these threats were carried out”
Another client from Ethiopia was told that “those currently detained in Ethiopia are kept in comfortable cells”
“You were not arrested alone but with the whole Executive Committee of the Student Union” was another surprising reason for someone to be refused asylum
A client of mine was told that written statements from current and former same-sex partners “do not demonstrate that you are homosexual”
A former British army interpreter in Afghanistan was refused asylum because he couldn’t be “100% certain” that the people who came round to his house to threaten him were from the Taliban
Just going to add this one to the thread, which I can see is simmering away nicely
A Tamil client of mine was beaten over the head, stabbed and burned with cigarettes before being left for dead by Sri Lankan soldiers. He was refused asylum because (among other reasons) he hadn’t explained why the soldiers hadn’t just shot him
Same client was also told his numerous severe & painful injuries could have been “inflicted for the purpose of simulating wounds”, ie that he had basically tortured himself in order to claim asylum
Two other Tamils (brother and sister) were accepted to have been multiply tortured and raped in custody but were refused asylum bc they had “not been of particular interest to the [Sri Lankan] authorities”
Just remembered the one where my 16-year-old client’s claim to have been a member of a secret Christian church in Vietnam was disbelieved bc he didn’t know how many ”chapters” there are in the bible & couldn’t explain the difference btw Catholicism & Pentecostalism

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alasdair Mackenzie

Alasdair Mackenzie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlasdairMack66

28 May
The Upper Tribunal has given important new country guidance in a case called KK & RS, which should make it easier for Tamil political activists to prove they’re at risk of arrest & torture in Sri Lanka
(Not on the UT website yet but here’s a link)
🧵1/
doughtystreet.co.uk/sites/default/…
Context: since the end of the civil war in 2009 & the crushing of the LTTE (Tamil Tigers), separatist activity has been impossible in Sri Lanka, and as a result the focus of the Tamil separatist movement has shifted to the diaspora, including in the UK 2/
noria-research.com/from-arms-to-p…
In that context, in its 2013 decision in GJ, the Upper Tribunal held there was a risk to ppl with what it termed a ‘significant role’ in diaspora activism - there’s no dispute over the dedication of the SL security forces to torture, sexual abuse & killing of Tamil activists 3/
Read 25 tweets
13 Apr
Last week we had to threaten the Home Office with a judicial review claim – a process which typically costs £1000s – to get a refugee the £8 weekly allowance he’s bn owed since Oct 2020. They agreed at the last minute so we didn’t proceed. So why’s that of any wider interest? 1/
Well, the govt last week issued a “summary” of departments’ submissions to the Independent Review of Administrative Law which raises some, let’s say, controversial attitudes to the legal system within government 2/
lawgazette.co.uk/news/no-eviden…
It’s odd they’ve issued only this summary rather than telling us exactly how specific govt depts would like to control processes by which they’re held to account by members of the public via the legal system. We can only speculate on what’s being hidden 3/
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
Read 12 tweets
24 Mar
Let’s say you are– for sake of argument – involved in a democracy movement in a post-Soviet dictatorship. Recently the police picked you up, beat the hell out of you & assaulted you in ways you’d rather not dwell on > 1/
Then they booted you out of the police station and told you to keep quiet if you value your life. Recovering at home, you’re aware of the blokes in parked cars outside the flat, & your neighbour’s friend in the police warns you you’re on the list next time it all kicks off 2/
You climb down a drainpipe in the middle of the night and make it to your aunt’s house.

What do you do now? 3/
Read 20 tweets
22 Mar
So Priti Patel is on the warpath again – about asylum seekers, their lawyers and the legal mechanisms they use to challenge the Home Office. Here’s a little thread to try & illustrate how honest she is being in presenting the government as the victims in all this. 1/
My asylum-seeking client – let’s call her Z – is a single woman with a small child. They applied to the Home Office for support & accommodation (“asylum support”) in March 2020. The HO agreed they’re destitute and therefore eligible for asylum support. 2/
Z and her child waited for that accommodation to be provided 3/
Read 15 tweets
10 Dec 20
Meet Mohammed al-Masari. He’s a former physics professor and leading critic of the Saudi Arabian royal family. In 1996 he fled to the UK and sought asylum. The Saudis demanded that the British should expel him. 1/ Image
This presented the then Tory government with the opportunity to show how much it cared for human rights, an opportunity which, obviously, it flunked. 2/
Now clearly Dr al-Masari would be tortured or killed if sent back, so how could the government placate the furious Saudis w/out breaking the law? They decided to send him to Dominica, in the Caribbean.
They offered the Dominicans large amounts in aid – so it’s widely assumed. 3/
Read 16 tweets
19 Oct 20
We regret once again to inform you that your taxes are being spent on misleading propaganda.

It’s important to appreciate just what’s going on here. >
This stat from the video is correct but out of context, bc a) most refugees in Europe don’t arrive via resettlement programmes but “spontaneously” ie independently of govt measures & b) the number taken by 🇬🇧 is a pinprick next to over 26 million refugees in the world in 2019>
But this is the real problem: the UK’s focus *isn’t* currently on resettlement - the 5600 accepted under that route compares to more than 13k accepted after arriving independently. So why does the Home Office want you to think this? >
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(