Today the @CommonsDCMS Committee publishes its report into the economics of music streaming. Here's a thread of the report's findings and recommendations. (1/25) #BrokenRecord#FixStreaming
Streaming has helped save the music industry following two decades of digital piracy but it is clear that what has been saved does not work for everyone. Issues created by streaming reflect fundamental problems within the recorded music industry. Streaming needs a reset. (2/25)
We urge Universal and Warner to look again at the issue of unrecouped balances with a view to enabling more of their legacy artists to receive payments when their music is streamed. (3/25)
The pitiful returns from music streaming impact the entire ecosystem. Successful, professional performers are seeing meagre returns from the dominant mode of music consumption. Non-featured performers are frozen out altogether, impacting what should be a viable career. (4/25)
The major music companies/independent record labels have consistently asserted that music streaming is simply ‘making available’, and therefore performers should be remunerated as though it was a sale. However, this does not consider the complexities of streaming. (5/25)
We recommend that the Government addresses these inconsistencies and incongruities by exploring ways to provide performers with a right to equitable remuneration when music is consumed by digital means. (6/25)
The right to equitable remuneration is a simple yet effective solution to the problems caused by poor remuneration from music streaming. It is a right that is already established within UK law and has been applied to streaming elsewhere in the world. (7/25)
A clear solution would therefore be to apply the right to equitable remuneration to the making available right in a similar way to the rental right. As such, an additive ‘digital music remuneration’ payment would be made to performers through their collecting societies. (8/25)
We recommend the Government legislate so that performers enjoy the right to equitable remuneration for streaming income. Amend the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 using the precedent set by the co-existence of the rental right and right to equitable remuneration. (9/25)
The Government should work with creators and the independent publishing sector to explore ways in which new and upcoming songwriters and composers can be supported to have sustainable careers and independent music publishers remain commercially viable. (10/25)
Metadata issues compound the poor terms on which creators are remunerated. Whilst there is a significant challenge, it is not insurmountable. The Government must oblige record labels to provide metadata for the underlying song when they license a recording to stream. (11/25)
The licensing and royalty chains of song rights causes considerable confusion and complexity to the system, and songwriters and composers pay the price. The Government should require all publishers and collecting societies to publish royalty chain information. (12/25)
There is no doubt that the major music groups currently dominate the music industry. We recommend that the Government refer a case to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), to undertake a full market study into the economic impact of the majors’ dominance. (13/25)
Independent labels must be supported to challenge the majors’ dominance and creators must be empowered to offset the disparity in negotiating power when signing with music companies. The Government should expand support for the Music Export Growth Scheme. (14/25)
We recommend that the Government concurrently expand creator rights by introducing a right to recapture works and a right to contract adjustment where an artist’s royalties are disproportionately low. (15/25)
Artists face a systemic lack of transparency from both music companies and the streaming services that license their works. Creators have a right to know about the terms on which their works are exploited and verify the outcome of these agreements. (16/25)
As a minimum, the Government should introduce a right for performers to have sight of the terms of deals where their works are licensed, on request and subject to non-disclosure. (17/25)
Where curators are paid or receive benefits in kind for playlisting, we recommend that they are subject to a code of practice developed by the ASA, similar to social media influencers, to ensure that the decisions they make are transparent and ethical. (18/25)
The Government should commission research into the impact of streaming services’ algorithms on music consumption, including where creators are forgoing royalty payments in exchange for algorithmic promotion. (19/25)
The Government should launch its consultation on the new pro-competition regime for digital markets by the time it has responded to this Report and commit to a reasonable time frame for when it reasonably expects legislation to be brought forward thereafter. (20/25)
We note the CMA has developed a pro competition framework for tech companies with ‘strategic market status’ that dominate digital markets. The CMA should explore YouTube’s streaming services as having strategic market status to encourage competition with its products. (21/25)
The Government should introduce robust and legally enforceable obligations to normalise licensing arrangements for UGC-hosting services, to address the market distortions and the music streaming ‘value gap’. It must ensure that these obligations are proportionate. (22/25)
As technology continues to evolve the Government must ensure that copyright law is fit for purpose and that appropriate mechanisms are in place for rights holders to enforce their rights. The Intellectual Property Office must not be a passive witness but an active player. (23/25)
We recommend that the Government set out a clear position on livestreaming, both regarding remuneration of rightsholders and the live sector and explain what actions it is taking to support rightsholders in tackling copyright infringement. (24/25)
Here is an article I wrote for the Independent about my Copyright (Rights And Remuneration Of Musicians etc) Bill which I hope will play a part in helping to create a fairer environment for talented people to make money from their creative skills. (25/25) independent.co.uk/voices/music-s…
For anyone wanting a short explanation of why this is important, I'd recommend watching this exchange I had with @MrTomGray in a previous @CommonsDCMS session on music streaming.
This thread is only a snapshot of some of the issues and recommendations contained in the report. I fully recommend reading the whole document: committees.parliament.uk/publications/6…
Here's a radio interview I did about the Committee's report.
Here's a short thread of the questions I asked Lord Frost in today's @CommonsDCMS inquiry into EU visa arrangements for creative workers. #CarryOnTouring (1/9)
Firstly I told Lord Frost I found his approach to Select Committee scrutiny appalling. I then asked him if he sees the issue of touring as an immigration issue or a trade issue? After repeating my question, he eventually says "both" but he says it's a complex question. (2/9)
I put it to Lord Frost that it's about trade because we're not talking about people permanently moving - it's about movement of artists to earn valuable export currency in an industry which has an export surplus. He says the government won an election to end free movement. (3/9)
Firstly it's important to point out that this committee should have been scrutinising Lord Frost - current Cabinet Office Minister who also serves as the Government's Chief Negotiator of Task Force Europe. Disgracefully, Lord Frost cancelled. (2/12)
Firstly I spoke to agent/promoter Craig Stanley of @MarshallArts about Lord Frost consistently trying to avoid appearing before @CommonsDCMS for scrutiny. Did Lord Frost previously accept a meeting with Craig just because Sir Elton John would be there? (3/12)
Today we should have been questioning Lord Frost @CommonsDCMS Committee on post Brexit touring issues - he didn’t want to come and now has pulled out of appearing - parliamentary scrutiny is not an optional activity for Ministers - this contempt for democracy must stop
In response to @julianknight15's point of order over Lord Frost's no show @CommonsDCMS, the Deputy Speaker has said: "The Govt must make every effort to ensure the appropriate Ministers are able to give evidence to committees in a timely fashion." (1/2)
"When the Minster concerned is in the House of Lords it is particularly important that committees in this House are able to hold them to account. I hope that every effort is now made to ensure that the committee is able to take evidence from the Minster." (2/2) #CarryOnTouring
Here's a short thread of the questions I asked the Information Commissioner, Elizabeth Denham, on the ICO’s investigation into Cambridge Analytica's seized servers and use of personal data. @CommonsDCMS
Firstly, I asked the Information Commissioner about the US Intelligence Committee's report and if they had contacted the ICO to receive evidence that had been seized from Cambridge Analytica's servers. She says she hasn't been contacted but would share if officially requested.
In April 2019 the ICO office promised a report into the
seizure of some of Cambridge Analytica's servers. I asked the Commissioner why the @CommonsDCMS only received a letter and not a report as stated.
The UK government has consistently failed to recognise the scale of the challenge facing those in the creative industries. Here's a short thread on today's @CommonsDCMS report on the impact of Covid-19, the problems faced and some of the recommendations.
In the first 12 weeks of lockdown, more than 15,000 theatre performances were cancelled at a loss of more than £303 million. Julian Bird, CEO of @uk_theatre told us 70% of theatres and production companies risked going out of business by the end of the year.
The @musicvenuetrust told the committee that 93% of the grassroots venue network faced permanent closure. @UK_Music told us 90% of all music festivals will be cancelled in 2020. @WeAreTheMU told us venues and festivals are vital because they act as R&D incubators for the industry
The UK government needs to appoint an Online Harms Regulator now to prevent a repeat of the damage done by fake news and misinformation on Covid-19 which has spread like wild fire on social media platforms. Here is short thread on @CommonsDCMS' findings.
The Misinformation in the COVID-19 Infodemic report finds: