There are only a few credible scenarios for this remarkable @guardian report, by @lukeharding1968 & colleagues, of leaked Kremlin papers showing a Putin plot to install Trump & destroy the US. All of them highly important to us all.
(a) it’s all true & the leak’s genuinely just that;
(b) it’s true & the ‘leak’ was done by the US (having obtained the documents by covert means), as part of a major counter-subversion effort; /2.
(c) it’s true & the ‘leak’ was done by the Kremlin, calculating it would heighten division in the US & make Putin & Putinism more feared;
(d) it’s fake & originates from US authorities, as part of counter-subversion;
(e) it’s fake & originates from the Kremlin (see (c)). /3.
It looks very unlikely it’s fake.
If it is, the apparently authentic detail renders it nigh on impossible that it originates from anyone other than the US or Russian governments. (Perhaps China. Happy to receive comments on that).
So what’s so important? /4.
Whichever way you look at it (absent the China scenario) there’s either
- a concerted, potentially existentially threatening operation by Russia against US internal order, or
- the US thinks there is & is now strongly reacting, or
- both. /5.
That, & the outcome, is of profound significance to the security, prosperity & well-being of all countries in the US-led global alliance. (Principally the Euro-Atlantic structures, the two main pillars of which are NATO & the EU. And US alliances in the Asia-Pacific region). /6.
What Soviet & earlier Chinese leaders understood, but Putin & Xi seem not to, is that their countries, too, are dependent on the power, success & stability of the US. /7.
Even while they seek - very expensive - freedom of action for China & Russia within boundaries set by the US’s requirements & its unparalleled ability to enforce them if it so chooses. /8.
Every previous post-war UK Prime Minister & Cabinet, with the possible & temporary exception of Anthony Eden, also understood that overwhelming logic & its corollary. /9.
Which is: the UK has to be fully engaged in all aspects of Euro-Atlantic cooperation & decision-making on security, & political & economic cooperation.
Or become a problem to be managed - with painful consequences, primarily for the UK - by the US, & EU & NATO partners. /10.
The present UK Prime Minister & Cabinet show little or no sign of that basic recognition. /11.
In fact, in line with the objectives of the reported Kremlin leak, there’s good reason to believe that the Brexit & wider strategy of Her Majesty’s Government relies on the return of Trump, or a similar development, preferably before the next US presidential election. /12.
That might seem absurd on many levels.
It is.
It’s also true.
As is the fact that the US President & his team are on the case.
Are you with them, or against them? /13. End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
▪️Be sure you’re willing & able to leave. Your integrity & contributions you can make elsewhere outweigh any ability to ‘improve things from the inside’ in a govt going beyond the pale. /1.
… uncomfortable questions, defending unfashionable views, and deflating intellectual pretensions in a way that somehow managed to be both disarmingly straightforward and subtly ironical. At the same time, he was a paragon of moderation … /3.
“The unwritten British constitution […] is a dangerously unreliable foundation […]. Lord Neuberger, the former President of the Supreme Court, even sees Great Britain on a dangerous course towards dictatorship under the Johnson administration”. /2.
“Great Britain is still a long way from the situation in Hungary or Poland, but a lot still reminds of the beginnings of an Orbán or a Kaczyński”. /3.
The difficulty with this vein of commentary by @jamesrwebber is it boils down to “the govt forced through an unsustainable Brexit deal, fracturing the UK, without NI majority consent, & lied. But we should now pretend the inevitable consequences … aren’t, … because”. /1.
The NI Protocol isn’t the problem, although it’s certainly problematic. The NIP’s a (necessary), temporary compromise. It’s a sticking plaster over the gaping wound consciously created by @BorisJohnson & @DavidGHFrost with their legally binding, ‘oven ready Brexit deal’, …/2.
… the purpose of which was to get the keys to Downing Street, regardless of entirely foreseeable & foreseen consequences. There’s no sustainable outcome which doesn’t involve UK membership of the single market & customs union, or substantially identical arrangements. /3.
“We will of course have to consider all our options” is some of the most threatening diplomatic language ever used by governments.
For it to appear in such an article, by two UK cabinet ministers, is both disturbing & a disgrace. /2.
To get to grips what’s going on, we need to recall the centrality of Ireland/NI to Brexit, Mr Johnson’s political survival & geopolitical interests orders of magnitude more significant than the GB-NI sausage trade.
The country can well afford to continue, for many more months if necessary, to use large scale, government deficit spending to support all sectors of the economy & workers unable to go out to earn a living. /2.
That’s because there’s no inflation risk to the direct creation & spending of the many hundreds of billions of £ needed to pay for that.