It is a significant error to assume that the U.S. enforcers are converging with the Europeans. @vestager hasn't blocked a merger in two years. Not one. She approved Google-Fitbit.

The EU has gotten headlines, but the bureaucrats there are corporatists.

wsj.com/articles/u-s-c…
I've been at conferences with European enforcers, and they are *explicit* in rejecting the Brandeisian view. They are strong proponents of consumer welfare and economist control over policymaking.
It's important to note @vestager is *explicitly* hostile to breaking up big firms. When asked if she agrees with Elizabeth Warren's plan to break up big tech, she said not really and characterized doing so as extreme and a violation of private property rights. Very Bork-ian.
If the U.S. gets aggressive, the Europeans may follow. But contra @ProfFionasm, it's not clear how much meaningful work is going at the European commission-level around competition policy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Stoller

Matt Stoller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @matthewstoller

11 Jul
1. Ok, so last week Joe Biden made a speech that is potentially as significant as Reagan's comment that "Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem." He said the era of corporate power is over.
mattstoller.substack.com/p/biden-launch…
2. "We are now forty years into the experiment of letting giant corporations accumulate more and more power." With an explicit attack on Robert Bork, Biden pronounced this experiment "a failure." whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
3. It's weird for Biden, a 78-year old political lifer from the 'corporate state of Delaware' - as he put it - would break with how the Democrats have been for decades. But Democrats aren't blind, they recognized Trump was a symptom of an angry public. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
Read 21 tweets
7 Jul
“The American public needs this agency solving problems, not speaking on panels."

Hahahahaha
“The moratorium on public speaking has thrown a wrench into several upcoming conferences that often feature FTC staff, such as next week’s American Bar Association’s annual consumer protection conference, which takes place every two years.”

Big thumbs up
The FTC in the last 20 years loved putting on roundtables, forums, panels, whatever.

Anything but ENFORCING THE LAW.
Read 5 tweets
1 Jul
The Federal Trade Commission is now holding forth on a rule to stop fraudulent Made in USA labeling.
Chopra says there has been a longstanding bipartisan consensus not to enforce against fraudulent Made in USA labeling, choosing a "highly permissive Made in USA fraud policy." Commissioners routinely voted to allow wrongdoers to escape penalties.
Republican commissioners were actually out of step with Donald Trump on Made in USA fraud. Curious to hear what GOP commissioners @CSWilsonFTC and @FTCPhillips say here. nytimes.com/2019/04/17/us/…
Read 26 tweets
28 Jun
So @MikeLeeforUtah still think antitrust law works well enough?
Judge James Boasberg - an Obama appointee - dismisses the case on market definition quibbling. Boasberg says there are no clear lines on what even constitutes social networking.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Basically the judge concedes Mark Zuckerberg said 'let's do crimes' but because judges now read antitrust law to require super weird expensive fights over market definitions, the case was dismissed. It can be refiled.
Read 7 tweets
26 Jun
These quotes from Larry Summers are practically word for word Chicago School talking points. Summers is not a scholar, he doesn’t have ideas, he’s merely a lobbyist for capital. bloomberg.com/news/videos/20…
The key political question is whether the point of antitrust is to take on market power or foster it under the guise of efficiency. Summers merely repeats all the old shibboleths, ‘protect competition not competitors,’ ‘1960’s horror show,’ etc.
If you think we have a monopoly problem in America then you have common sense. If you think things are fine then you are Larry Summers. bloomberg.com/news/videos/20…
Read 4 tweets
25 Jun
This is just wrong and a naive read of the Chinese government. The PRC will not respond to anything but force and sustained embarrassment.

Until scientists stop acting like weenies and say 'the virus probably came from the Wuhan Lab and China is covering it up' we get nothing.
The utterly reckless and naive approach to the Chinese government continues to astonish. Their leaders are self-described Leninists who do not believe in scientific truth. To them truth is about raw power, and nothing more.
And by 'force' I don't mean war, I mean using economic and political leverage to protect ourselves from PRC coercion.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(