It is a significant error to assume that the U.S. enforcers are converging with the Europeans. @vestager hasn't blocked a merger in two years. Not one. She approved Google-Fitbit.
The EU has gotten headlines, but the bureaucrats there are corporatists.
I've been at conferences with European enforcers, and they are *explicit* in rejecting the Brandeisian view. They are strong proponents of consumer welfare and economist control over policymaking.
It's important to note @vestager is *explicitly* hostile to breaking up big firms. When asked if she agrees with Elizabeth Warren's plan to break up big tech, she said not really and characterized doing so as extreme and a violation of private property rights. Very Bork-ian.
If the U.S. gets aggressive, the Europeans may follow. But contra @ProfFionasm, it's not clear how much meaningful work is going at the European commission-level around competition policy.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Ok, so last week Joe Biden made a speech that is potentially as significant as Reagan's comment that "Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem." He said the era of corporate power is over. mattstoller.substack.com/p/biden-launch…
2. "We are now forty years into the experiment of letting giant corporations accumulate more and more power." With an explicit attack on Robert Bork, Biden pronounced this experiment "a failure." whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
3. It's weird for Biden, a 78-year old political lifer from the 'corporate state of Delaware' - as he put it - would break with how the Democrats have been for decades. But Democrats aren't blind, they recognized Trump was a symptom of an angry public. theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
“The moratorium on public speaking has thrown a wrench into several upcoming conferences that often feature FTC staff, such as next week’s American Bar Association’s annual consumer protection conference, which takes place every two years.”
Big thumbs up
The FTC in the last 20 years loved putting on roundtables, forums, panels, whatever.
The Federal Trade Commission is now holding forth on a rule to stop fraudulent Made in USA labeling.
Chopra says there has been a longstanding bipartisan consensus not to enforce against fraudulent Made in USA labeling, choosing a "highly permissive Made in USA fraud policy." Commissioners routinely voted to allow wrongdoers to escape penalties.
Judge James Boasberg - an Obama appointee - dismisses the case on market definition quibbling. Boasberg says there are no clear lines on what even constitutes social networking.
Basically the judge concedes Mark Zuckerberg said 'let's do crimes' but because judges now read antitrust law to require super weird expensive fights over market definitions, the case was dismissed. It can be refiled.
These quotes from Larry Summers are practically word for word Chicago School talking points. Summers is not a scholar, he doesn’t have ideas, he’s merely a lobbyist for capital. bloomberg.com/news/videos/20…
The key political question is whether the point of antitrust is to take on market power or foster it under the guise of efficiency. Summers merely repeats all the old shibboleths, ‘protect competition not competitors,’ ‘1960’s horror show,’ etc.
If you think we have a monopoly problem in America then you have common sense. If you think things are fine then you are Larry Summers. bloomberg.com/news/videos/20…
This is just wrong and a naive read of the Chinese government. The PRC will not respond to anything but force and sustained embarrassment.
Until scientists stop acting like weenies and say 'the virus probably came from the Wuhan Lab and China is covering it up' we get nothing.
The utterly reckless and naive approach to the Chinese government continues to astonish. Their leaders are self-described Leninists who do not believe in scientific truth. To them truth is about raw power, and nothing more.
And by 'force' I don't mean war, I mean using economic and political leverage to protect ourselves from PRC coercion.