📣📣 UPDATED COUNTY-LEVEL VAXX THREAD (last one for a month as vaxx rates have slowed to the point these aren't changing much anymore):
ALABAMA:
ALASKA (as always, they're all over the map, literally):
ARIZONA:
(R^2: 0.7016)
ARKANSAS...vaccination rates on the left, new case rates on the right. Not pretty.
CALIFORNIA.
Yes, R^2 is up to 0.7661.
Yes, the R^2 has been gradually *increasing* in nearly every state.
COLORADO.
Another high R^2: 0.7122.
CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, DC, HAWAII & RHODE ISLAND (none more than a handful of counties so there's not much point in graphing them separately; I lumped them together anyway for completeness).
Kalawao County, Hawaii has actually vaxxed ALL of of their...86 residents.
FLORIDA:
(Sumter County is home to The Villages, the massive MAGA retirement community.)
RE. FLORIDA NEW CASE RATES:
This is what FL looks like...but since they're only reporting county-level data WEEKLY now, it's up to a week out of date. Their recent surge therefore isn't reflected here...yet.
GEORGIA.
IDAHO. Another high R^2 state:
ILLINOIS. Jo Daviess County is the big outlier; if anyone knows why, feel free to comment.
INDIANA.
IOWA.
KANSAS. Anyone know if there's something special or unusual about Graham County?
KENTUCKY.
LOUISIANA. Outlier West Feliciana is home to the LA State Penitentiary, which *may* explain their high vaxx rate? (6,300 prisoners, 1,800 staff, total county population just 15,600)?
MAINE.
Yes, you're reading that correctly: R^2 is 0.8135.
MARYLAND.
MASSACHUSETTS.
Yes, every single county is blue.
Re. Dukes/Nantucket: The vaxx data for both of these is very odd, likely due to the nature of each. CDC puts them at an absurdly low ~2% but city/village-level data says it's over 90%. I'm going with the latter.
MICHIGAN (my home state!).
I've separated Detroit from the rest of Wayne County to illustrate how much discrepancy there can be even at the county level.
It'd be awesome to do this by zip code but there's 41,600 of them nationally...
MINNESOTA.
MISSISSIPPI.
Only 1 county has cracked 45%.
MISSOURI.
Vaxx rates on the left.
New case rates on the right. 😳😳
MONTANA.
R^2: 0.7112.
And yes, there's a fascinating pattern re. which states are showing a steep slope/high R^2 vs. which states aren't, which I'll get to downthread...
NEBRASKA.
That's correct: McPherson County voted over 90% for Trump and is less than 10% vaccinated.
NEVADA.
NEW HAMPSHIRE.
NEW JERSEY.
NEW MEXICO.
R^2: 0.7185. Starting to see the pattern yet?
Los Alamos: Science!
NEW YORK.
Brooklyn & The Bronx need to get it together.
Hamilton County is the least-populated county east of the Mississippi. Someone told me what the deal was here re. their outlier status but I forgot.
NORTH CAROLINA: Like Alaska, literally all over the map. Anyone want to remind me what's up with Martin County?
NORTH DAKOTA.
Slope County has 750 residents. 68 of them are vaccinated.
Sioux County has 4,200 residents, and is 82% Native American.
OHIO.
OKLAHOMA.
Again, only 1 county over 45% vaxxed.
OREGON.
R^2: 0.6905.
Baker County is the outlier.
PENNSYLVANIA.
Philly needs to get it together quickly.
SOUTH CAROLINA.
SOUTH DAKOTA.
WARNING: SD's data is only 83% complete.
Having said that...a *second* deep red McPherson County under 10%. Huh.
There's only 3 McPherson Counties in the U.S. All three are deep red. Two of them are less than 10% vaxxed (the third is 40%, in Kansas).
TENNESSEE.
Vaxx rates on the left, new case rates on the right.
While TN has been making all the wrong types of COVID news the past week or so, the #DeltaVariant surge seems to be pretty minor and evenly distributed *so far* at the county level...but so is the vaxx rate.
TEXAS.
Holy smokes: R^2 over 0.6 with 254 counties.
Presidio County continues to kick ass.
King County...not so much.
UTAH.
R^2: 0.7268.
Summit County leads the way. Juab...trails.
VERMONT.
VIRGINIA. CDC data is too incomplete for some states so I use @COVIDActNow data for those. For some reason they don't include Manassas Park or Manassas City, however, so I have to use the state health dept. website for them. Huh.
WASHINGTON STATE.
R^2 0.7123.
WEST VIRGINIA.
WISCONSIN.
WYOMING.
R-squared? 0.8542.
PUERTO RICO.
They don't vote for President in the general election and I know nothing about internal PR politics, so I'm just ranking their municipalities from lowest to highest-vaxxed for completeness.
AS NOTED ABOVE, you may have noticed that some states have low correlation trendlines (R^2) while others are extremely high...and some have nearly flat lines while others are very steep.
I broke the 48 contiguous states (+DC) out into 7 geographic regions:
--DEEP SOUTH
--REST OF SOUTH
--MID-ATLANTIC
--NEW ENGLAND
--MIDWEST
--MOUNTAIN WEST
--WEST COAST
(Neither Hawaii nor Alaska seemed to fit in anywhere)
The results are fascinating.
The Southern states generally show a shallow slope and low correlation...as does New England...but for very different reasons.
The Midwest and Mid-Atlantic show mid-level slopes and correlations, appropriately enough...
...but the Mountain West and West Coast states have VERY steep slopes and R^2 factors of over 0.7 across over 400 counties!
I have my own theories about all of this, but this thread is way too long already so feel free to comment below!
Meanwhile, if you find my work useful and want to support it, you can do so here, thanks! acasignups.net/support
UPDATE: Here's what the 12 Western states look like combined (West Coast, Mountain West and Texas)...a full 1/3 of the total U.s. population:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's an updated version of my "Dem Stop the Steal!" conspiracy theory thread which hopefully is less scattershot.
There's 3 main claims:
1. "How could there be 20M fewer voters than in 2020 w/"record-breaking turnout?"
2. "How could 15M fewer voter for Harris vs. Biden?"
3. "How could so many swing state voters vote for the Dem for Senate but not for Harris for POTUS?"
There's a few others, but these are the biggest ones, so let's tackle them first:
1. There weren't 20M fewer voters.
I've been compiling the data as it's being updated by CNN's tracking center via a Google spreadsheet. As of this writing, total POTUS turnout is ~147.6M, or ~10.8M lower than 2020's 158.4M.
Yesterday I posted a thread digging into the actual data behind the "20M missing votes!" and "15M fewer than Biden!" conspiracy theories being tossed around the past few days.
Via CNN, as of this writing, total 2024 POTUS votes are only down 13.9 million vs. 2020...with a likely 11.5 - 12.0 million ballots still to be counted across 30 states.
Total 2024 turnout will likely be ~156M or so...just a couple million fewer than 2020.
Again, using CNN's data & estimates, once every legitimate ballot has been counted, Trump will likely have around ~78 million votes to Harris' 75-76 million.
That'd mean he added ~4 million vs 2020 while she lost ~5-6 million.
...the vast majority of this discrepancy happened in districts/counties which were heavily red to begin with, which is why the MAGA COVID Death Cult factor only ended up making a decisive difference in exactly one statewide race: Arizona Attorney General: acasignups.net/22/12/29/updat…
At the House district level it didn't make a decisive difference in any races at all. To understand why, let's look at two extreme examples...
People have started asking why I'm still pushing fundraising for Dems just 5 days before Election Day. All the ad time has been purchased & the lit pieces printed & mailed out already, right?
There's several reasons: 1/
1. For state legislative races in particular, a last-minute cash infusion of even $50 can mean an extra few pizzas for tired & hungry canvassers or an extra burner phone for phone banking.
2. After the polls close, there's going to no doubt be some races which require recounts...which may or may not have to be paid for by the campaign requesting it, depending on the state and the margin. That's gonna cost money.
🧵THE DEAD POOL: Since @MikeJohnson and @JDVance are promising to Concentrate folks w/pre-existing conditions into separate Camps, let's talk about that. 1/ acasignups.net/24/10/04/dead-…
Let's go back to the pre-ACA healthcare landscape. This is what it looked like in 2012...*before* the ACA's major provisions went into effect.
Half the US had employer coverage. Another third had Medicare or Medicaid. ~11M had "individual" insurance; ~48M had nothing at all. 2/
The ACA had 2 main goals:
1. Reduce the number of uninsured Americans as much as possible by making coverage more affordable & accessible;
2. Provide protections from insurance industry abuses, *especially* for the individual market where the abuses were the most blatant. 3/