1. I think @fordm is accurate here in saying the Biden White House is effectively giving up on the voting rights bills. It's useful to think about why & what that means going forward.
2. The reasons for giving up are well known: filibuster, Manchin, Sinema. An unhill fight and do you want to wasted resources on a very uncertain thing when you could be focusing on walk-arounds (pushing enforcement of existing civil rights laws, donor investment in GOTV).
3. The best argument for de-priotizing voting rights is that it only matters on the margins & that a strong economy is more important in deciding elections. There's something to that but...
4. Margins matter in very close elections, as USA elections are these days. Both last 2 presidencies decided by less than 80,000 votes in 3 states. Also walk-arounds seem flimsy since courts whittling away existing voting rights laws.
5. Bottom line is that there is a disconnect between Dem rhetoric (existential threat!) and actions (de-prioritizing voting rights laws). That disconnect is likely to be demoralizing to Dem voters: jeetheer.substack.com/p/biden-turns-…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeet Heer

Jeet Heer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HeerJeet

16 Jul
1. This whole business about General Milley being worried about the coup has to be put in context of his earlier statement "The institutions are bending, but it won't break." It's worth remembering that at key moments Milley himself bended. Image
2. If we remember the Lafayette Square moment, then Milley's recent spate of interviews feels a bit like reputational laundering. For it to amount to something more serious we'd need a congressional investigation into what Trump actually tried to do with the military.
3. To the extent Milley & the top ranks bent resisted Trump and now want to be on the right side of history by taking a stance against white supremacists in the ranks, they are likely to targets of rightwing anger. That's the root of the "woke military" meme.
Read 4 tweets
9 Jul
1. This is spot on. For centuries novelists -- running from Sterne and Austen to Dickens to Bellow, Roth &
Roupenian have had a monopoly power on parodying their family, lovers & friends. Now people have more power to strike back!
2. The 19th century version of the Cat Person scandal involved Dickens and a little person, Mrs. Seymour Hill, whose dwarfishness he mocked as "Miss Mowcher" in the serialized version of David Cooperfield (where he also implied she was a pimp).
3. Mrs. Seymour Hill read David Cooperfield in serialization & objected to the cruel jokes about her appearance and the suggestion in the novel that she procured young women for aristocrats.
Read 8 tweets
8 Jul
1. There's a definite push among the far right ghouls to exonerate the Jan. 6 rioters & make Ashli Babbitt into a martyr. Trump is now on board and, given experience of last 5 years, this is likely to become more and more a mainstream GOP position. This is very dangerous.
2. It's unclear whether Democrats have a response ready for this Trumpian embrace of Jan. 6 with Ashley Babbitt as a Horst Wessel-style martyr. It's a mythos in the making and a purely legal investigation can't refute a myth.
3. On a lower, popular level you see a few liberals responding to Ashly Babbitt sanctification with gleeful derision: "she fucked around & found out" etc. This is also a mistake, not just callous but also shifting blame away from Trump.
Read 4 tweets
7 Jul
1. Elevator Pitch: Press Barons: A Miniseries. In the 1980s, Robert Maxwell, Conrad Black, & Rupert Murdoch were building rival media empires & political power. One is now dead (an alleged suicide), one a former felon & pathetic Trumpist sycophant & one the king of the world.
2. All three were from the hinterland of the old Empire who made their way to metropolitan London, seeing it as the natural seat of a global media empire (Maxwell via the British allied Czechoslovak Army in exile, Black from Canada, Murdoch from Australia).
3. Maxwell's murky death in 1991 (he fell off or jumped from the Lady Ghislaine, named for his latterly infamous daughter) revealed that his press empire was built on fraud and embezzlement. It left lingering questions about his connections to various intelligence agencies.
Read 6 tweets
6 Jul
1. This stuff is dangerous and I feel people are averting their eyes from it out of Trump-exhaustion and maybe a misplaced belief that ignoring it will help contain it.
2. Trump isn't acting like an ordinary ex-president. The closest parallel might be Theodore Roosevelt after 1909, who remained a political powerhouse & thorn in side of actual president culminating in 3rd party run in 2012. But Trump is even beyond that.
3. Even if Trump doesn't run again in 2024, he's clearly intent on being a powerhouse in GOP & shaping party. Media blackout here isn't working since GOP pols take cues from him & want his blessing (Ohio & Pennsylvania state GOP are good bellwethers here).
Read 7 tweets
3 Jul
1. In 2001 National Review did a cover story on "Rumsfeld the Stud." The following year People magazine included Rumsfeld in their list of "sexiest men" alive. In 2003 Midge Decter published a fawning Rumsfeld biography that opens with a story about a friend with a Rummy pin-up.
2. The Rummy-As-Sex-Symbol moment, a meme that flourished not just in the right-wing media but also the mainstream press from 2001-2004, has been dropped down the memory hole, a collective embarrassment no one wants to talk about. What was going on?
3. Partly, it's a matter of how in a time of crisis the media (again, extending beyond the right) likes to find a Churchillian hero who embodies collective toughness, competence, resilience. We saw this recently in cults of Fauci & Cuomo (or earlier of Mueller).
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(