American policy toward the Democratic Republic of the Congo is enormously important, but no mainstream journalist would ever suggest sending troops there, or suggest that we're "losing" the DRC to China or Russia. I wish this attitude were the default in our foreign policy.
The world is full of countries with problems, and it would be nice to go back to our sensible pre-WWI tradition of staying out of them. The best way we can help people in other countries who are suffering is letting massive numbers of them immigrate, to our mutual benefit.
If Venezuela wants to make Xi Jinping Thought mandatory in school, and let China bleed its budget dry by operating a huge military base there, then let them have at it. Fire all these imperialist lifers at the Pentagon and State Department before they drag us into another war.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I watched the first episode of a 2016 Chinese police procedural called "Medical Examiner Dr. Qin" last night, and I can't recommend it highly enough. Spoilers ahead, but as you'll see it doesn't really matter.
The show starts with police finding a deep-fried human hand in a vat of illegal cooking oil. An unscrupulous vendor skimmed it from a sewer, where a criminal had just happened to dump the deep-fried remains of his two victims.
Having found deep-fried human remains of a human hand at a food market, the police decide they have 48 hours to solve the crime before the public becomes upset. For the rest of the show there is a digital counter, letting us know how the men and women in blue are doing.
I understand that "DOOM! DOOM!" is an engaging headline, but we should talk some more about how to live in the coming world as a practical matter, and how to create economic incentives to help the people most affected.
Much more climate change than we're already seeing is locked in. If emissions went to zero tomorrow, we'd still see hotter summers for years. I understand the political goal of making every headline sound like we're about to die, but it's cynical and I believe counterproductive.
The deadline the Senate is racing to meet is that they're sending themselves on another vacation. Can senators get the legislation written in time to go off and do fuck-all in August? A nation holds its breath.
Politico calls trying to get something done before going on a month's vacation a hardball tactic. The Senate is also on vacation right now, making it harder to meet this deadline. I'm not making any of this up.
I understand the difficulty of moving bills through an obstructionist Senate, but I don't understand why Democrats don't make everyone stay and do their job for as long as it takes to produce legislation. The utter lack of urgency is infuriating.
Thanks so much to TechCheck for having me on! Let me expand a bit on what I think the structural China problem is. The country is basically a theocracy, but since Deng's time it has been ruled pragmatically by rulers who were willing to interpret the faith quite broadly indeed
In this framing, the Chinese state religion is Marxism/Leninism/Mao Zedong Thought. Marxism of course doesn't think of itself in those terms—it claims to be a scientific theory of history—but treating it as a religious faith gets you to interesting conclusions, so let's do it.
Until recently the modus vivendi with China was that the CCP could try however it wanted to explain that it was still a Communist Party domestically, but in its external relationships the country would fully participate in global capitalism and not get all weird on us about it
Biden is simply lying when he says the law prevents him from letting thousands of Afghans, men and women who put their lives at risk helping American occupation forces and are now in imminent danger of being murdered, into the United States. cnn.com/2021/07/14/pol…
Trump just hated immigrants and said so. What Biden is doing is more sordid.
Democratic leaders seem to agree that:
1. These Afghan refugees will become US citizens 2. They helped Americans to such an extent that it put their own lives in danger 3. They are so dangerous they must be kept penned in on military bases in the interim
The fact that it's 2021, we can build fully autonomous vehicles, and we're not sending them to every interesting spot in the solar system is one of the many frustrations that together fill up my day. news.arizona.edu/story/methane-…
It cost less than $1B to launch and operate New Horizons to Pluto. Cassini cost $3B. Artemis (launching space dads to the moon) is going to cost at least $85B minimum. For that budget we could search for life on Titan, Europa, Enceladus, Ganymede, and a half dozen other places
People who aren't space nerds may not realize how little is in the pipeline. There is basically nothing going past Mars, and launch windows are closing. I wish one of our billionaires would become obsessed with Jovian moons instead of sending his sagging body to float overhead