So I had this fun summer side project going where I meticulously thread 100 works of my all time favorite architect, 1 per day, and then fleeted the highlights with a bit of a storyline but I won’t finish all 100 houses on the schedule by the time fleets get the teardown on Aug 3
One theme of the threads are sleuthing out the important houses of record in satellite data that have since been torn down to make way for mcmansions and such. These houses are as ephemeral as fleeting fleets in the grand scheme of things.
But it turns out that Twitter HQ was disappointed that existing users employed the fleets feature to promote their own tweets (guilty as charged) instead of fleets yielding their intended business purpose to attract new Twitter users afraid of tweeting because they are durable.
But at least I tried to find a way to promote tweets in the most interesting way possible and I was just finding my mojo when they killed it but it was too little too late. Since I espouse that Facebook is a malign force (it is!) I shouldn’t just exodus to Instagram.
Twitter has confidence in dominating the short text medium but it doesn’t have the gumption to capture the short video market (rip vine rip fleets) even tho it’s always been theirs for the taking.
So is it competition that Twitter can’t do short video because Instagram/TikTok duopoly conquered the market or is it something else? People have fewer choices in the market. That much is observable.
tbh menlo park should be pissed af that twitter is killing fleets bc it makes insta feel like a monopoly
Jaffe mysteriously died in 1993. Did he drown because he was a terrible swimmer or did he commit suicide or did he fake his death and escape to India? Because Big Tech is go big or commit seppuku I don’t know how to finish telling the story I started.
Moral of the story if it’s not obvious already: basing creative side projects and entrepreneurial endeavors dependent on big platforms is risky actually
Someday I’ll tell the story of how Twitter killed my tech startup because it was too much like Moments which is a product that no one uses but they refuse to kill unlike fleets which folks actually used.
Moments but not Fleets.
Ok dudes.
Maybe analytics aren’t leading to really smart business decisions?
Silo your organization and Moments and Fleets get released and no one knows what’s going on even tho you could own it all if you de-siloed your organization.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They covered up Cambridge Analytica until forced to confront it because it was a GOP donor funded op.
They covered up Putin’s op because “company before country”
They do cover ups because they get away with it. There is no accountability. There is only public relations.
We are reminded of a factual error in the book #AnUgluTruth: Facebook learned about Cambridge Analytica before the Guardian report. This is public knowledge sourced from the Washington DC AG’s lawsuit against FB RE: CA.
Redactions newly revealed in this thread. Manafort’s lies about KILIMNICK ran much deeper than previously known. Incredible abuse to have pardoned the henchmen. Failures of Mueller, distortions by Barr, and cowardice of Senate Rs leading us down the path toward the insurrection.
“No collusion” but Manafort appears to have conspired with Putin’s spy to share voter data, campaign strategy, and Ukraine policy and lied about it, and was pardoned for lying about it.
In hindsight, Barr was diabolical in his redactions of the Mueller Report. Delay in getting redactions revealed by court allowed public and especially press to mistake the collusion question as resolved. Concealing the Cambridge Analytica question was a part of this clever scheme
Cryptocriminology: “Last year was a banner year for ransomware groups, according to a task-force of security experts and law enforcement agencies which estimated that victims paid about $350 million in ransom last year, a 311% increase over 2019.” bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Thread on the criminality-at-scale intrinsically enabled by decentralized finance and digital currencies easily corrupted despite a religious belief in maths.
☑️Right to Know, Transfer, Delete
☑️Right to sue
☑️Duty of care
☑️Cambridge Analytica Bankruptcy loophole closed
☑️anti-Algorithmic bias
☑️Data broker registry
☑️unambiguous, fair-and-square opt-in, revocable, anti-dark pattern, anti-discriminatory consent UX requirements
…
New York needs to lead the nation,
set the highest standards, and strive for GDPR adequacy to maintain lawful and protected flows of data internationally. Splinternet is the alternative so tech lobbyists *must* support #NewYorkPrivacyAct to prove they’re serious about adequacy.
If 4% of iOS users are *NOT* blocking cross-app data tracking then the whole adtech economy ought to collapse because it is so obviously fraudulent. It does not measure anything of aggregate value anymore because it is no longer representative of anything terribly meaningful.
(Deleted a mangled and typo’d tweet. There is a clear and present use case for an edit button. That’s the thing even though it’s also a ridiculous information veracity UX conundrum.)
Marketers: Consumers who install adblockers are our most savvy and desirable target audiences because we know they are real humans who reject ads rather than scammers cheating ad networks at scale with automated fraud.