Just lol

Despite all progressivism's efforts, humans still care about their own children. Since "education" is the most important element of your kid's life, deciding who controls that education is the best means to create a permanent cultural schism away from these people
This is why the campaign to ban CRT is critical. Not only is it working for once—fueled by parental urges that may be one of the only forces as strong as the leftist urge—but it opens the doorway to the creation of state-funded parallel institutions to the regime
Let's think through the three basic outcomes here

1) Anti-CRT wins outright, no more teaching white kids they're devils

2) Anti-CRT results in a muddled legal outcome that creates immense pressure for vouchers/school withdrawal

3) Supreme Court declares CRT the law of the land
3) might sound bad. But it's already the default future of education.

All that you've done by forcing 3) is forcing the regime to formalize what it's already doing to you. And regime formalization is a radicalization device.

That means every outcome is a win.
When you live under the rule of liars, forcing them to tell the truth is an act of immense political power.

It's very, very hard to make liars tell the truth. That's why the power of parenthood is one of the only ways to achieve this.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doctor-Baron 17cShyteposter, DDS

Doctor-Baron 17cShyteposter, DDS Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @17cShyteposter

17 Jul
It seems to me that a huge driver of leftism, on both its Marxist and liberal wings, is due to the fact so few people now own their own businesses or even *tenant* farms

A modern employee/renter seems to have less autonomy than even a serf expected to till his lord's land!
If this sounds insane, remember that the goal of the WEF is for you to own literally nothing, which means to be *responsible* for nothing. Which is a level of eternal childhood: for adulthood is the act of taking responsibility, and learning to steward for yourself Image
If I can stray off the reservation, I believe that much of the "alienation" of capitalism is in fact this, the alienation of people from direct ownership of their own businesses, or productive smallholder land.

That's what makes you feel human.
Read 6 tweets
17 Jul
When business was skeptical of if not tacitly hostile to the leftist urge, it created a kind of balance of powers

Now that it's working hand-in-glove with full-burn progressivism, we're standing on a very dangerous ledge, a political phase-shift we haven't seen since post-WW2
Between roughly 1948-2014, intellectual/bureaucratic life was essentially left-liberal

But business was largely right-liberal. So if you disagreed with gov-academic intellectual consensus, you could still exist within the economic sphere, that was not actively hostile to you
There was a kind of balance, which left politics essentially stable. Even during the Troubles of the 1960s-70s, when the ruling class reshaped political society, right-liberals could still participate within economic society. There was still an out to at least exist.
Read 7 tweets
8 Jul
Yes, reminder that Orban and his party won Hungary's elections with a supermajority capable of rewriting its constitution at will.

But when it makes even the slightest move to do act on the will of its own people, its democratic action is treated as fascism by the unelected EU
In what sense is "democracy" real when the vast will of the Hungarian people can be overruled by unelected bureaucrats of super-national foreign powers imposing their own norms on a far smaller domestic electorate?

Is this colonialism, plz help me understand, democracy
You know what's really funny? Afghanistan

These people will spend two years scrubbing a country of its actual military hostiles, and the remainder of all of eternity killing Afghanis until they're willing to enforce American feminist democracy, which—whoops, we can't do lol
Read 4 tweets
7 Jul
Since liberalism is of the left, it will always enable the advance of the left, to the point where it's now advocating very principled liberal ideas like "the state must be allowed to teach white children that they are uniquely evil as a race"
Being a weak form of leftism, liberalism has no way to stop this process within itself

If liberals want to preserve their beliefs from getting devoured, this means they must sometimes resort to illiberal methods: like, say, banning CRT, and firing any teacher who breaks the law.
Rufo's managed to thread an incredibly fine needle (wielding illiberal power against lib "free speech," as used by the Cathedral) to assert post-WW2 liberalism (MLK-style equality) against left-illiberal "equity," at a *state* level, where the Constitution (might) still apply
Read 7 tweets
3 Jul
Liberation movements rely on the notion that freedom is somehow being expanded with each new civil rights movement

But all liberation movements ultimately require the elimination of the rights, norms, and traditions of the group the "oppressed class" is being "liberated" from
One of the biggest lies of Post-WW2 liberalism is that the legally-declared rights are all that matters. This automatically sacrifices rights so basic that no one ever thought they would need to be protected by the law

Like young girls not having to sleep among young "girls"
This also allows for the moral and legal mindset that all rights are fluid concepts that are up for constant renegotiation as we make more and more "progress," which discovers that the natural and inalienable rights of the Constitution were, in fact, neither of the two
Read 4 tweets
30 Jun
This feels dead to rights. Not only does it feed (lol) into the gray goo ideology, where no bodies are "healthier" than any others, but it absolves the managerial caste of having to address how its rule has inflicted a much lower standard of bodily living on its subjects
Liberalism loathes having to pass judgment, since it sees itself as holding no real authority to do that, so it never intended to do anything about this

Luckily, its leftward wing has provided it with the escape hatch of a liberation movement—being crazy fat was good all along
Since liberalism can't pass judgment, it's incapable of curbing problems—including all the new ones it's created—except through the one means it does (or did) well: science/tech

Since it hasn't managed to invent an anti-fat pill, it has to turn to ideological solutions instead
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(