It wont surprise many that the House of Lords inquiry into QE did not produce a Radcliffe Report - but is more hawkish than I expected.

ft.com/content/60d239…
first, it's somehow concluded that QE may be inflationary, while simultaneously calling @bankofengland to clarify how QE generates inflation
@bankofengland 'slaves to which defunct (monetary) economists?' via quick word count in 68 pages report:

* 'inflation' x ≈ 200 times
* 'money supply' x 1
* 'fiscal' x 60
* 'coordination' fiscal&monetary x 2
* 'market liquidity' x 4

Milton alive in spirit, if not theoretical essence
@bankofengland My testimony has sadly failed to convince Committee that you cannot worry about 'deficit financing ' without understanding why it's necessary structurally in sovereign-bond based macrofinancial regime
Coordination fiscal-monetary matters not just because financial system is so different from age of Friedmanite obsessions with inflation, but also because climate crisis
Report reduces complex questions of fiscal-monetary interactions to 'how do we manage peculiarities of institutional arrangement Treasury - BoE?'

hiding theoretical and structural issues in an operational Trojan Horse
one picture that exquisitely captures lack of any macrofinancial lens in this report.

through macrofinancial lens, state issues both reserves and gilts (sovereign bonds) to private finance

gilts do for market-based finance what reserves do for banks
if there is a substantive failure from Bank of England, it's the failure to communicate clearly the macrofinancial role that government bonds play *

* great Andrew Hauser speeches notwithstanding

this is the monetary world we live in:

we worry about inflation, we insinuate fiscal dominance, we condemn central banks' self-harming insistence on buying sovvies, we remain oblivious to the obvious explanation: they HAVE to

(well, you worry about inflation)
to make sense of Report's focus on inflation, read this brilliant @MkBlyth piece

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
yeah, inflation is coming

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Daniela Gabor

Daniela Gabor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanielaGabor

13 Jul
Spain's Social Democrats asking Cuba to push on with 'structural reform' as if:
1. we dont know how that went in Europe
2. it's not the very pro-market reforms that are fomenting inequality and social tensions against background of tighter US blockade
Under Diaz-Canel, Cuba has implemented gradual but substantive Washington Consensus:
weakened social safety net (la libreta, comedores en empresas), pushed price liberalisation, unified currencies, allowed more private sector activity, prioritised foreign currency shops
some of these measures make sense if you're living under the mother of all balance of payment constraints.

but we know from Eastern Europe that such measures exacerbate inequality dramatically.

pretending otherwise is silly, especially from 'progressive' politicians
Read 5 tweets
13 Jul
Larry Fink complaining that IMF/WB havent embraced derisking as development/Wall Street Consensus sufficiently - and not anywhere, but at the G20 meeting.
Development as Derisking, as if the subprime moment never happened. Image
even starker call for MDBs/IMF to derisk 'development' asset classes for private investors

this is what development looks like in the age of asset management - cc @adribuller @BJMbraun Image
Read 4 tweets
8 Jul
cannot decide whether @ecb 2% tinkering is a distraction or a massive Trojan Horse for normalising targeting spreads and other innovative crisis policies
10 minutes into this press conference, and all we're debating is what happens around 2%

finally - decarbonise and you shall have inflation @Lagarde ?
Read 8 tweets
8 Jul
it's shocking that @ecb Strategy Review says nothing about fiscal-monetary interactions, when ECB has bought basically all sovvies issued by Euroarea countries since the pandemic
yes @Lagarde mentions macrofinancial linkages, but there is nothing in the text that points to the critical role that sovereign yields play in those linkages
Read 4 tweets
8 Jul
so @ecb new climate strategy is out, and it's letting down those of us who expected an ambitious approach.
in my view, far less ambitious than Bank of England's.
1. ECB chose a 'risk framework' that emphasises risks that climate crisis poses to private finance, not the ways in which dirty lending accelerates climate crisis

ECB wastes chance to support Commission in its double materiality efforts.
private finance will be happy
2. ECB conceives transition risks - those risks to private finance from policies to address climate crisis - as entirely fiscal policy related (carbon prices)

but what about transition risks stemming from ECB decisions to decarbonise collateral & corporate bond purchases?
Read 19 tweets
5 Jul
it's year of the Lord 2021, and tenured US economics professors think it's ok to imagine a neoliberal university where non-whites would be paid less. Image
perhaps Tyler Cowen should give up his tenure now and compete for students, he's got an exciting time ahead as a preacher of precarity Image
upps, some dissatisfied customers Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(