So here are the key takeaways from #Rivercide.
1. We're rightly disgusted by the privatised water companies, cutting their costs by dumping raw sewage into our rivers.
But revolting and extreme as this is, it’s NOT the primary cause of river pollution in the UK.
Thread/
2. So what is? The answer will surprise many people.
Farming.
There are several reasons: soil erosion, fertilisers, pesticides etc.
But the most extreme cause is this: industrial livestock units.
The problem is simply stated: they produce too much dung for the land to absorb.
3. They gather nutrients from a large area and release them into a small one. Modern chicken farms, for example, channel soya from vast areas of Brazil and Argentina into huge numbers of birds in industrial units. The nutrients in their dung are spread on the surrounding land.
4. The soil can’t absorb them all. It soon saturates. The surplus, from then on, washes into the river. It doesn’t matter whether farmers pump it directly into the river or spread it on their fields in just the way the rules demand. Eventually it ends up in the water.
5. So once a certain number of chicken, dairy or pig units have been built in a catchment, from then on the tragedy is preordained. Even if there were effective government monitoring and enforcement, it would make little difference. The fate of the river has been determined.
6. In other words, the crucial decision point in the story is when planning permission is granted for industrial livestock units to be built. The local authorities granting it, and the regulators issuing environmental permits, sign the death warrant for the river.
7. Astonishingly, in many cases no environmental decision is made at all, because below a certain, very high threshold (40,000 chickens or 1,000 pigs) a livestock unit DOES NOT REQUIRE an environmental permit. It’s a shocking and disgraceful regulatory failure.
8. Worse still, we discovered that, in the Wye catchment and many others, no attempt is made to assess the *cumulative impact* of the livestock units pouring nutrients into the river. Each one is assessed as if it existed in isolation.
9. In theory, you could truck away the surplus manure, and spread it on arable land somewhere else. But its water content is high and its value is low, so, according to an agronomist I know, the maximum viable distance is between 5 and 10 miles.
10. As agriculture has specialised, some regions have concentrated almost entirely on livestock, and some on arable. To shift the manure to arable regions would in many cases require journeys of dozens or even hundreds of miles. The diesel would cost more than the dung.
11. Incidentally, given the drug residues, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, heavy metals and other substances in this manure, we shouldn't be spreading it anywhere. Let alone allowing it to wash into our rivers.
12. In other words, the only way of saving the rivers blighted by manure pollution (mostly in the west and north of the UK) is to shut down at least some, and probably most, of the industrial livestock units in their catchments.
13. In our film, the Welsh minister for rural affairs, Lesley Griffiths AM, appeared to commit to reversing her own decisions and closing livestock units if she deems it necessary to save our rivers. That's big news. Let's demand similar commitments in the rest of the UK.
14. On the positive side, the song we asked @owensheers and @charlottechurch to write, The River Is Us, is just amazing. It's a stunning, beautiful anthem for our rivers. It got a bit distorted in transmission, but will be released in other ways. Let's get it to Number 1.
15. Christmas single campaign?
16. Anyway, you can watch it all here:
17. With massive thanks to the director @frannyarmstrong, the producer @NicolaCutcher and the hard-working, amazing, underpaid crew, all of whom mobilised their great skills to pull off what many told us was an impossible feat: the world's first live investigative documentary.
18. Huge thanks too to our amazing contributors
Angela Jones
Nathan Jubb
Morgan Jones
Ash Smith
Peter Hammond
Christine Hugh Jones
Alison Caffyn
Lesley Griffiths
Benjamin Zephaniah
Emily Tilling
Gavin Bown
Feargal Sharkey
Karen Shackleton
Jo Elworthy
Owen Sheers
Charlotte Church

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with George Monbiot

George Monbiot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeorgeMonbiot

17 Jul
For 20 years, the billionaire press told us "we can easily adapt to a warmer world".
Try telling that to people in Germany, Belgium and the western seaboard of North America.
And this is just one degree of heating.

The media did this, as surely as the fossil fuel companies.
Let's not forget those who told us there was little to worry about. People with massive media platforms, who helped push us towards catastrophe.
Matt Ridley
Bjorn Lomborg
Nigel Lawson
Christopher Booker
David Rose
Peter Hitchens ....
The roll of dishonour is long and grim
And, of course, their editors and proprietors.
And the so-called thinktanks shilling for the fossil fuel companies.
Doubtless they all believed they were being ever so clever. But if we recall their names at all, we'll remember them as traitors to humanity.
Read 10 tweets
15 Jul
All my working life, I’ve wanted to fight the forces trashing the living world. I’ve wanted to fight them in the most powerful medium, television. Instead, I’ve found myself fighting TV executives, who for 36 years have nixed almost every proposal I’ve made.
Doubtless unwittingly, they stand guard in front of the corporations and governments destroying our life support systems, ensuring that journalists can very seldom make the hard-hitting exposes required to hold them to account.
They appear to be terrified of the kind of kinetic, campaigning, investigative journalism I want to do. And their fear seems to make them furious. The treatments I’ve written seem to press a button, which makes them shout and swear and dismiss them out of hand.
Read 8 tweets
9 Jul
Every government seeks to remake the nation in its own image.

And what a cruel, reckless, dysfunctional nation they're turning this into.

Thread/
Their vision appears to be of a nation where no one does anything for the sake of any one else.
In which self-interest rules.
In which we become people

“… who'd never heard
Of any world where promises were kept,
Or one could weep because another wept.”
In which we have boundless compassion for pets, but none whatsoever for asylum seekers.
In which, if you are poor, sick, disabled or homeless, you are treated as a nameless embarrassment, invited to shuffle off quietly and die.
Read 12 tweets
8 Jul
Climate crimes have perpetrators. They also have facilitators. The BBC is still facilitating misleading propaganda. That's the opposite of a public service.
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
As usual, it's lions led by donkeys. The BBC has some excellent frontline workers, such as @RHarrabin and @BBCJustinR. But among senior decision-makers, there seems to be a disastrous combination of scientific illiteracy and the appeasement of powerful interests.
When you look at the way the BBC reports the livestock industry, you find that nothing has been learnt. In this case, it's not even both-sidesing the issue: livestock farmers and their lobbyists have a clear run. If the BBC were any keener on sheep, it would be illegal.
Read 5 tweets
7 Jul
To those now claiming that continuing to wear a mask in public places is a sign of mental illness:

I hope you don't get what I got for Christmas - a 14-week knock-out from C19.

I don't want to give that to anyone. You call it a syndrome. I call it concern for other people.
I'm OK now, but the illness was vicious and frightening. It was 14 weeks I'll not see again. For some people with Long Covid, it could be a lifetime. Do they really not care about the possibility that they might inflict that on someone else?
I'm trying to understand the people now bombarding me with mask-hate, and tbh I'm struggling. My best guess so far is that if you have no empathy, you can't understand why anyone else would, so you assume it's some kind of pathology.
Read 6 tweets
4 Jul
Every day I see people who, to shave 50 seconds off their journey, risk shaving 50 years off their life.
Or someone else's.
Every day I see something that challenges the claim we prioritise our survival.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(