I suspect the Prime Directive in Star Trek is a Graves 8 idea.
At 7, you have the awareness and ability to influence civilizations and eco-systems.
Even though 7s don't operate on ego, it's still singular discernment.
8 creates collective discernment for larger societal moves.
8 is a collective of 7s all capable of systems moves and together can make decisions that influence the trajectory or a country or continent...socially, economically, and even spiritually.
At 9, as possibly seen with the big reveal in the #Loki series, is a singular being capable of controlling the entire ecosystem themselves but only does so when absolutely necessary. A second tier dictator of sorts but not the same resource grabbing motivation.
This would mean putting themselves solely in charge of the fate of entire planet or species, in a way. This doesn't have to be a known thing, they don't need the egoic status or their name on everything but they see no other choice but to take control.
It's interesting to see second tier characters pop up in pop culture...Thanos, Dr. Manhattan, Ozymandias.
You get 3-Red characters as an Anti-hero at times...the 7 character can be seen as an anti-villain...doing what lower tiers would deem evil but to them its practical.
I wouldn't be surprised if we see more anti-villain characters showing up in stories going forward.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've been thinking so much about stories and myth.
We interpret so much of our reality through myth and our imaginations guide so much of our reality.
Spiral Dynamics can be used to illustrate this so well.
1-Biege is an open canvas ready to receive whatever story is to come.
Babies' minds are ready to receive language teachings, completely dependant on the immediate environment and no sense of what's coming. A blank page of new life.
2-Purple establishes stories and myth to protect from the unknown, which is virtually everything.
The world is massive and terrifying. I have no choice but to respect elders and gods to get what I need to survive. Dance, sacrifice, rights of passage, whatever it takes.
It's a bit hard to explain a non-attachment to a political or religious identity. That seems to be foreign as a paradigm.
I grew up atheist which was more DEtached from religion but was, in itself, a mode of moral tempering.
So, still tethered to religion relatively.
I fought with a lot of people online about religion versus science, which at the time felt oppositional. In my personal life it was incredibly lonely.
I felt enveloped by religious belief, people trying to convert me and rampant moral inconsistencies.
So, my place was online.
I don't remember specific people or groups I connected with online.
Atheism wasn't quite at the scale it's reaching now. It was like nomads passing by and jumping into debates...seeing each other on the battlefield not realizing we're on the same "side." Rogues. Vigilantes.
I've thought a lot this year about supporting family and friends in their intense development difficulties.
A thing that comes with personal growth is that you begin to see what others need and perhaps start to feel like you want to fix them.
Truth is, you can't or shouldn't.
In coaching, I support people who are at a certain point and actively trying to grow.
In many cases, the person you're trying to "save" is not looking to be saved.
They've identified with their suffering or see you as too close to them and see you as a threat unconsciously.
Even if they're blaming and asking you to save them it's unlikely they'll listen because you're too attached to their attachment of their own suffering.
That's like sending someone to war to cure their PTSD.
You can't explain away or emotionally manipulate worldview.
Worldview is worldview.
It's unwavering and unconscious.
If a worldview works for someone then why would anyone change?
More doing, less talking and convincing.
Embody your values in your life through personal demonstration.
Embody meaning inner self-growth as opposed to external blame.
Even this is a presentation of my worldview. Can't escape it.
You're going to leave a lot of people behind.
My worldview is 5-orange in Spiral Dynamics.
This means a self-focus, rational-focused, freedom fixation, off the beaten path, and the beginnings of a more world-centric focus as opposed to seeing the "world" through shared myth and collective safety.
I focus on INTP growth because many are being left behind and assuming or behaving as if they're broken, worthless, "absent-minded professors" incapable closing browser tabs.
I believe INTPs have the opportunity to influence what we see as genuinely good, beautiful and truthful.
This is especially so in a world that doesn't know how to honor truth in its search for opinions to express.
The internet has become junk food, having diluted its recipe of open world-wide internet to political boxed in and separated by sides exacerbated by algorithms that feed our own desire to be right above all things regardless of what is actually truth.
I've always struggled with the disparity of mentality work ethic versus mental health limits.
Meaning, I always feel I can push myself harder then I end up paying for it. The disparity creates internal tension and self-judgment of my own willpower.
I've had to make adjustments.
The healthiest thing that I've been able to do for myself is separate out that self-judgment. To watch myself have a mental health episode but not judge myself for my experience. I approach my episodes with "Aw, OK. This is what we're experiencing." versus "Ugh not again."
Much of that self-judgment is baked in how much we submit our internal voice to others. Is that self-judgment really you? Is it someone else in your life? Is it what you think someone thinks of you? Reclaim that voice for yourself.