i was prepared for some potential bad takes when i opened nature.com/articles/d4158… but last 2 paragraphs just blew me the fuck away.
let's start with, uh, how little empathy do you have to have to write the words "more death, although seriously concerning, is a minor problem..."?
anyway i seriously am blown away that this person is a virologist. i thought that we moved past the whole "partial immunity" nonsense an eternity ago.
you can select for escape mutants towards a monoclonal or an antiviral. b/c those can't fucking ADAPT to the virus.
guess what our adaptive immune system can do, OTOH? this is assuming it manages to escape a complex polyclonal response over multiple arms of the adaptive immune system.
this. just. isn't. how. it. works.
for starters, let's just take the most obvious thing: immunity from natural infection seems comparable to 1-dose mRNA vax. but in that case the two are not meaningfully different to a virus from an antigenic evolution PoV.
secondly, CoV antigenic drift is capable of giving us a virus capable of evading sterilizing immunity & giving us a nasty cold for a few days. this is not the same as an immunologically novel virus.
there's a reason HCoV-OC43 pneumonia cases are extremely rare & it's b/c everyone has their first infection in early childhood (various papers i've read place median age of first infection between 5 - 7 years old).
i am now increasingly confident this will be the case too for #SARSCoV2 in a vaccinated individual for, again, all but the rarest of immunocompetent cases.
people somehow seem to keep forgetting that T cells exist & it's so exhausting.
like, i just don't get it. why do people seem to keep forgetting *basic* immunology while making extremely confident answers to virus evolution questions that we can't even answer for something like measles?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"EDF a été informée de l’augmentation de la concentration de certains gaz rares dans le circuit primaire du réacteur n°1 de la centrale nucléaire de Taishan."
-> "EDF has been informed of the increase in the concentration of certain rare gases in the primary circuit of reactor no.1 of the Taishan nuclear power plant"
"La présence de certains gaz rares dans le circuit primaire est un phénomène connu, étudié et prévu par les procédures d’exploitation des réacteurs." -> "The presence of certain rare gases in the primary circuit is a known phenomenon in the operating procedures of the reactors."
disclaimer: i know i'm not the target of this question (1) i'm as anti-CCP as it gets, 2) i am on record as saying i will happily DRINK a glass of the undiluted Fukushima wastewater & i stand by that), but let's take a look at the Framatome/Areva report.
i haven't been able to find the actual report they gave the US DoE, so right now i'm going by france24.com/fr/info-en-con… & edition.cnn.com/2021/06/14/pol… under the assumption that news agencies didn't fuck up interpreting the science.
(if anyone can find a copy of the official statement from Framatome i'd really like to read it. English or French is fine).