“Traditionalist Catholics” are horrified by the notion that they might have to receive the religion they’ve devoted their lives to in a language they actually understand.
“Trads” want “True Catholicism” to remain a vague, obscure, never-to-be-actualized, never to-be-questioned *thing* that they wave around as a counter-revolutionary force, a grand perversion, which stands for their (understandable) hatred of everything as it is.
I wouldn’t say that “True Catholicism” is an “idea” or “ideal” because it *is* the Roman Church, a real, existing institution, one that, in fact, operates quite swimmingly in the modern world these “trads” love to hate.
The Catholic Church either poses no threat at all—despite its trillions in assets—to modern life or else it has played a role in bringing this state of affairs about. It’s either/or.
So when I see these “trads”—to a man: short, overweight, and unmanly—rage against the end of the Latin Mass, I can only engage in psychology—of them, not Francis, who’s merely contemptuously flexing on the Right, like the top dog that he is.
Putting aside the aesthetic, high-brow quality of the Latin Mass—which I rather like—what’s so wrong about thinking clearly, in your mother tongue, about scripture, the message of the head of your church and his alter-ego, what you’re actually doing at the Eucharist, etc?
No scripture is written in Latin, instead Hebrew, Aramaic, and an Ebonics version of Greek. The “Latin” nature of the Catholic Church, and weekend LARP of the Mass, is only vampirically leaching off the Ancient world, whose religious system Jews and Christians overturned.
If @MattWalshBlog really believes the Latin Mass is bringin’ in the young people, then he should demand that, instead of a language none of these young people understand, the Mass be incanted in Spanish, or perhaps Yoruba. Francis might go for that one!
Or perhaps the trads would prefer that the Mass become a sonic tone poem. Wouldn’t it become even more “profound” and “mysterious” if Catholicism were articulated in no language at all?
Again, the real threat to Christianity is not lukewarm, progressive, or “cafeteria” Christians—but piercing light shined onto the Holy texts and doctrines. A real down-to-earth (in more ways than one) understanding of what this religion actually is and says.
It is true that most Christians don’t actually understand their faith, the “trads” are remarkable in being aware of this reality—and damn proud of it!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have a certain appreciation and respect for this man's "damn the torpedos" attitude. What continues to annoy the hell out of me is conservatives either engaging in revisionism of Jan. 6 ("it was Antifa") or denial ("they were just tourists").
Yes, Jan 6 was buffoonish, delusional, and had no chance of success, but it was understood by many, maybe most, participants as a kind of "revolution," a means of securing the presidency for Trump. To deny this is simply to disconnect from reality in the name of partisanship.
J6 was, in its way, an insult to the grand tradition of *coups d'état*—it was comprised of goofballs acting like goofballs, getting fleeced by the grifters who organized it. It was not a tightly organized and disciplined action for the seizing power and legitimacy.
One of the most common defenses of Trump in the dissident sphere is that "he's got good instincts"—with that admission that he's out of his depth or constantly undermined by Jared, the media, Deep State, and GOP. But "Trump's heart," I was told, "was in the right place."
Here we have Exhibit A for such a defense. Trump tried to go full Ron Paul at the 11th hour—change the course of American history no less—but was prevented by his own incompetence and the Deep State dragging its feet.
What we see in these battles between the Trumps and the Cheneys is a culture war—or, more accurately, a class war—over the aesthetics and rhetoric of the GOP. It’s not about ideology or policy; it’s about who will get pandered to most.
It’s not wrong to say that Trump thinks Cheney is “bad for our country” because she doesn’t release aggressively moronic public statements like this.
The GOP’s “civil war” has little to nothing to do with actual policy or vision. On all critical matters, the camps are aligned. Trump’s “populism” never actually went beyond promoting Americans’ God-given right to industrial-strength toilet flushing and scalding hot showers.
Clearly, the American Left is headed in the same as the direction as most of the world—Israel is viewed as illegitimate. Whether that will amount to whining about Palestinians on Twitter, and vaguely demanding a two-state solution, or actual policy, remains to be seen.
The only non-Jewish community on Earth that is “all in” with Israel is White Christians in the South and Midwest—who are, in fact, more Zionists than the Jews. And, for the time being, the leaders of the Democratic Party are staunchly Zionist.
This presentation reminds me a lot of "Zeitgeist" viral video from 10-15 years ago. It offers a "gnostic" and "Manichaean" outlook. It gets some things right, which makes it even more insidious. The whole appeal is "awakening"—and thus redeeming the fallen world.
The key qualities to it are
+ a sinful, fallen world
+ absolute evil at the top levels of the political order
+ good, Christian patriots, who are victims and make up the resistance
+ revelation (in this case of hypocrisy and crimes)
=> redemption
America has never really been a nation-state. It’s essence is as a *frontier*. FJ Turner really got that right. The frontier, in this sense, is open, endless space, and specifically not a border separating hostile peoples.
From its inception up until 1924, America never had a real *immigration* policy. It had a naturalization policy, and was still open to most all comers. Between 1924-1965, America was, sort of, a nation, with mass assimilation to WASP norms. But that’s the exception not the rule.
After 1939, America’s imperial demands were so great that to even think of it as a nation-state—like, say, Finland—totally obscures its dynamic and logic.