As Canadians and Americans come to grips with the grisly details of children's burials near boarding schools, it is also important to note the role that voluntary & religious organizations played, too.
A #MormonAmerica thread on the LDS Indian Student Placement Program. /1
In 1947, a young Navajo girl named Helen John traveled with her family to Richfield, Utah, hired as field laborers. Growing up, Helen hid whenever cars drove through her reservation out of fear they would abduct her and take her to boarding schools. /2
But in Richfield, she encountered a white family named the Averys who introduced her to Mormonism. At first she was reluctant, and the language barrier made it difficult, but eventually she was intrigued and desired to stay and learn more. /3
A local LDS leader, Golden Buchanan, tried to find a home for her. When he asked for church guidance, apostle Spencer W. Kimball showed up on his doorstep and encouraged him to house her himself, which he did. /4
Over next 7yrs, Buchanan placed a rising number of Indigenous children. But he did so w/o official church support, & often skirted the law. Finally, in 1954, the church created the Indian Student Placement Program (ISPP), under Relief Society oversight. /5
Helen John was therefore the first of what were nearly 50,000 Indigenous children, mostly Navajo, placed through the ISPP. These children would stay with white LDS families during the school year, and return to their reservations in the summer. /6
There was a broader context for this initiative. In post-WWII America, a number of state & federal legislators had concluded that persistent poverty on reservations was not due to centuries of colonialism(!), but rather Indigenous culture, & assimilation was the only solution. /7
They therefore dissolved some tribes, cut funding for others, and both started and encouraged placement programs with the hope of assimilating the younger generation into white society. The ISPP was just one example, although a particularly large one. /8
Pushing the initiative in LDS circles was Spencer W. Kimball, who was raised near reservations in Arizona and long held an interest in the "Lamanites." (He would later become the LDS president who removed the racial restriction on black members.) /9
Kimball was known for his generosity toward Natives--Helen John lived with him while prepping for beauty school exams--but he shared broader colonialist views. He believed reservations would eventually disappear, and that Native children, once assimilated, would turn "white." /10
With Kimball's push, the church sent hundreds of missionaries onto reservations to not only teach them the Book of Mormon, but to encourage them to baptize their children and send them to the ISPP. Some students & families would later say they felted pressured & even duped. /11
The pitch was especially appealing on reservations that suffered from government neglect. Navajo reservations in Utah, for instance, did not have public high schools, so options were 1) bus kids 80 miles away, 2) homeschool, 3) pay for private ed, or 4) the affordable ISPP. /12
While most white families who participated did so w/good intentions--as I'm sure many who read this can personally attest!--it's crucial to remember the program was predicated on the erasure of Indigenous cultures, & a diversion of resources from improving Native communities. /13
As Margaret Jacobs wrote, this was a global, colonialist practice aimed to decimate Indigenous peoples. Placement programs fell out of favor in 1970s when tribes (rightly) argued resources were better sent to reservations & preserving Native culture. /14 nebraskapress.unl.edu/nebraska/97808…
It caused severe dissonance w/the children involved, who were forced to choose between accepting the new culture forced upon them or retaining the cultures of their ancestors. Lacee Harris wrote about this dynamic in a powerful @DialogueJournal essay. /15 dialoguejournal.com/wp-content/upl…
The ISPP reached its peak in 1970 with 5,000 annual students, but slowly tapered down over the next few decades. It was officially ended in the 1990s, with the final student graduating in 2000. But the legacies still last, in several ways. /16
First, there have been several lawsuits alleging sexual abuse in these placement homes, and that the LDS Church failed to provide proper support. Some cases have been settled, others are ongoing. The broader context of ecclesiastical abuse is still an open question. /17
Second, Mormonism has yet to construct a space that recognizes Indigenous cultures without trying to fit them into artificial "Lamanite" categories. The theological & cultural legacies of colonialism are long-lasting and ever-present. /18
Helen John only lasted two years in school, but she remained in the Buchanan household for a decade. She served a mission, was sealed in the SLC temple, and her four kids went to BYU. She is generally seen as a "success" story. /19
But there were thousands and thousands of Indigenous children who struggled with the dissonance. One study in the 1970s found that a majority of Navajo children ended up rejecting Mormonism altogether.
And who could blame them? /fin
Some further reading recommendations. A solid overview of the ISPP is found in Matthew Garrett's MAKING LAMANITES: MORMONS, INDIANS, AND THE ISPP, 1947-2000 (@UofUPress). uofupress.lib.utah.edu/making-lamanit…
For placing the ISPP in its broader historical context, see Margaret Jacobs's "Entangled Histories: The Mormon Church and Indigenous Child Removal from 1850 to 2000" (@JMH_Journal). jstor.org/stable/10.5406…
And finally, a brilliant analysis of LDS & Indigenous identity construction is Elise Boxer, “'The Lamanites Shall Blossom as the Rose': The Indian Student Placement Program, Mormon Whiteness, and Indigenous Identity" (@JMH_Journal). jstor.org/stable/10.5406…
I've been really enjoying the virtual #SHEAR2021 conference, though certainly missing seeing everyone in person. But one of my favorite events are the book awards, so in advance of tonight's @SHEARites announcements, here are my Top #10 Early Republic Books from 2020.
First, because I'm a cheater, I want to list three "Honorable Mentions"--books that I loved, but probably fall just outside SHEAR's scope, which I interpret as *after* the Revolution and *before* the Civil War.
Honorable Mention #1: @SerenaZabin's THE BOSTON MASSACRE: A FAMILY HISTORY, a gripping social history that brought new perspectives on the local conflict that ignited a global war. indiebound.org/book/978054491…
Spent my sabbath morning returning to @benjamingwright’s powerful, and quite relevant, BONDS OF SALVATION: HOW CHRISTIANITY INSPIRED AND LIMITED AMERICAN ABOLITIONISM, to resurrect my #ReviewThread series.
Note: capitalized words are categories. /1
SUMMARY: from the beginning, most American Christians could be categorized in two camps: conversionists, or those who believed spreading salvation was too priority, and purificationists, or those who believed abolition would purify the nation. /2
During the revolutionary era, there was genuine hope that slavery could be abolished, and Wright highlights these early purificationist voices. However, most came to see missionary work and national salvation as the more pressing need, so they distanced from abolition. /3
There’s few more consequential figures in Mormon studies than D. Michael Quinn, who worked for LDS church, taught at BYU, was excommunicated, & published a series of books that reshaped the field.
Mike passed away last night. I’d like to highlight some of his life and impact. /1
Quinn was born to a Mexican immigrant father & sixth-generation Mormon mother. He earned a degree in English from BYU, served mission to UK, then spent 3 years in military before finding history. He 1st did MA at Utah, then a PhD at Yale, where he studied the Mormon hierarchy. /2
His research coincided with historical openness at the LDS archives, & he was hired by Leonard Arrington to mine boxes & boxes of documents, many of them untouched. The period was later referred to as “Camelot,” and Quinn referred to every day as “Christmas morning.” /3
I vividly remember my American Heritage teacher at BYU spending an entire week arguing why raising the minimum wage would not only be disastrous for the economy, but a betrayal of LDS theology.
It was that moment I recognized the cultural gulf between me and many in the faith.
Also, there’s a great history to be written dissecting BYU’s massive American Heritage program to understand the modern Mormon mind. My textbook had an image that showed abortion rights as the first step toward atheist totalitarianism.
Also also, I’ll always remember how, after the prof spent the whole semester railing against socialist countries, an international student raised her hand and said her experience being raised in a European nation was sublime.
In honor of passing 10k followers, how about a #MormonAmerica thread? (For those new: these are historical threads drawn from my current book project.)
Tonight, let's talk about the rise & fall of Amy Brown & Richard Lyman, the most significant LDS couple in the 20th century. /1
Amy Brown and Richard Lyman were born to prominent Mormon families in 1872 and 1870, respectively. They met at Brigham Young Academy in 1888 and were quickly drawn to each other. /2
Richard was tall, broad-shouldered, and exceptionally smart, not to mention handsome. Both his father and grandfather were apostles, and he was expected to succeed in both secular and ecclesiastical roles. /3
Let's talk about a time when Utahns rejected medical intervention as an infringement on personal rights, resulting in unnecessary suffering and death. /1
Around 1900, smallpox, a scourge that had troubled civilizations for centuries, was becoming more containable. Crude vaccines had been around for generations, but in the 1890s scientific advances made them more reliable and available, resulting in state mandates. /2
Like many states, Utah debated whether they should require vaccination. Some LDS leaders supported the measure, while others opposed. As a result of this division, and because they wanted to appear separate from the state, however, the church decided to mostly remain silent. /3