Good morning.

Listening in to the first sentencing proceeding for a felony-charged U.S. Capitol breach defendant: Florida man Paul Hodgkins, seen here toting a Trump flag in the Senate.

Follow along here, @lawcrimenews

Background, @Aaron_Keller_ lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-si…
This is from Hodgkins' statement of offense, signed by the government and the defense. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Prosecutors want the judge to impose an 18-month sentence, citing the "need to deter others [...] in cases involving domestic terrorism, which the breach of the Capitol certainly was."

Govt sentencing memo:

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
We're about to begin.

This is the defense sentencing memo, depicting his client as a target of so-called "cancel culture" and a "post-Christian" society. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
US District Judge Randolph Moss is going through the preliminaries now, including the pre-sentence report.
Judge Moss notes that the statutory maximum on the top count is 20 years in prison.

(Note: Hodgkins is likely to get much less than that, with the prosecution-requested 18 months at the "mid-point" of the guidelines range.)
Hodgkins is expected to speak, according to his lawyer.
Judge rejects Hodgkins' request to be designated a "minor" participant in the offense, noting he went onto the Senate floor.

Hodgkins agreed to pay $2,000 in restitution, the judge notes.
AUSA Mona Sedky is up first, describing three "particularly disturbing" aspects.

1) The goals to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.
2) Intimidation, force, violence and destruction.

Judge Moss interrupts: Govt recognizes he isn't charged with violence, he says.
Sedky: "It's important to view the context of what was unfolding around him and what he was willingly" making himself a part of.
Sedky:

"In terms of the Jan. 6th attack Writ Large, the reason that we're focusing on the larger context here [...] is primarily in the context of general deterrence."

A message needs to be sent to anyone contemplating a "second act," she says.
Sedky says Hodgkins needs to be held into account for his role in "imperiling democracy."

She says he is part of the reason the Senate was evacuated.

"So there was a very meaningful impact to democracy, here," she says.
Judge Moss asks if he's correct in understanding that the Senate was already evacuated by the time Hodgkins entered the building.

"That's correct," Sedky says, agreeing the judge that the damage was the Senate needed to remain evacuated.
Sedky says that Hodgkins' must also be held into account for "emotional injuries" by congressional staffers.

"The staff members who could not evacuate the building" and had to remain in their offices "cowering" were "terrified," she says.
Sedky:

"He was a part of that mob," she says, describing him "hovering in front of Vice President Mike Pence's desk."

"Mr. Hodgkins came prepared for confrontation," she says.

"He proudly posed for selfies and texted those to his friends. He made himself part of the action."
Sedky:

"What Mr. Hodgkins' conduct is not is a 15-minute walk with a crowd through the U.S. Capitol building."
Sedky:

She hits a theme from the government's sentencing memo: the "decision points" where Hodgkins could have turned around but did not.

"He made a key decision to press forward."
Judge Moss: Approximately how many people wound up on the Senate floor?

Sedky: Roughly 30 people, emphasizing that's a rough estimate.
Sedky notes that many of them are removing papers from Senators' desks.

"They're pillaging," Sedky says, referring to the other rioters.
Sedky says she's struggled to find a pithy catch-phrase that would encapsulate what Hodgkins did, but she said the D.C. Circuit found those words.

"This was a grave danger to our democracy," Sedky says, quoting the appellate court.
Sedky says: "Jan. 6th was an act of domestic terrorism," though she adds that the government concedes that Hodgkins' acts in particular do not fall into that definition.
Sedky says Hodgkins attorney said from the start that "My guy" wants to plead guilty and get the benefit of being among the first to do so.
Sedky says a tough sentence must be dealt to prevent a repeat attack, so that "there won't be a next time," she said.
Judge Moss says he's sympathetic to that argument but he needs to consider how this particular case fits into the "larger puzzle."

"I think there are going to be" in the Capitol riot docket "a broad range of sentences," he adds.
Judge Moss adds that he wants to make sure that he is dealing a sentence that specifically applies to Hodgkins.
Defense attorney Patrick Leduc is up for Hodgkins:

He says that it'd be "most appropriate" at this point to have his client deliver his statement first.
Hodgkins up:

"I am very privileged and very humbled to be here in court."

He asks for forgiveness if he comes across as nervous.

"I can say without a shadow of a doubt that I am truly remorseful and regretful of my actions in Washington, D.C."
Hodgkins says he went to Washington, D.C. to support a president he "loved," but he had no intention to storm the Capitol.

"Caught up in an emotional protest," he says, he followed the crowd.

"This was a foolish decision on my part that I take full responsibility for."
Hodgkins declared that "Joseph R. Biden, Jr." is "rightfully and respectfully" the president of the United States.
Hodgkins:

"To put things in short, I allowed myself to put passion before my principles," which led to him violating the law for the first time in my life.

He says he's stopped drinking alcohol and donated his blood.
His lawyer Patrick Leduc is back up, disputing the government labeling his client a "rioter."

"We don't sentence people collectively. We sentence people individually."

Leduc says we "left that behind" during Japanese-American internment.
Leduc: "Paul Hodgkins is not my enemy."

"It was a protest that became a riot. The government's sentencing memo says that again and again."

He denies that it was "domestic terrorism."
Leduc, an Army colonel deploying tomorrow, adds: "I may be the only one in this courtroom to say that he's been shot at and bombed by real terrorists."

He contrasts it with the Weather Underground, the Oklahoma City bombing, and '54 Capitol shooting by Puerto Rican nationalists.
Judge Moss pushes back on that monologue: "There were people storming through the halls of the Capitol chanting 'Where's Nancy?'"

"That is more than a simple riot," the judge adds.

"That is not an exercise of First Amendment rights by any measure."
Chastened, Leduc backtracks and says that he agrees and suggests there's no daylight between his position and the judge's.

What happened on Jan. 6th was a crime, he adds.
Leduc talks about the fact that his client is the first Capitol riot defendant to be sentenced for a felony in connection with Jan. 6th:

"What an amazing weight has been cast upon this humble, quiet, fine man," Leduc says, referring to his client.
Leduc notes that Anna Morgan-Lloyd got a non-jail sentence. The fact pattern dividing them was that she was at the Rotunda, and he was on the Senate floor.

Moss says: It's more than that.

He pleaded guilty to a felony charge, the judge notes.
Leduc says that his client will wear a "scarlet letter" for his offense.

"He's going to have to carry that with him too, your honor."
Leduc: "How much are we going to nail this man for his 15 minutes of bad judgment, or 22 minutes of bad judgment?"

"We're a nation divided, and we're divided because we lost our way as a country."

He reiterates his "cancel culture" rhetoric.
Leduc: "Never mistake the man for the moment. It's easy to do."

He launches a number of Biblical comparisons for his client, including Moses, describing him as a murderer, and David, describing him an adulterer.
Judge Moss asks whether, if he deals the sentence the defense wants, it will heal the nation or harm it by encouraging others to think they can engage in conduct like this in the future.
Leduc says the prosecutors have given a "wink and a nod" in showing his client's limited role: "They're trying to thread the needle. I get it."
Leduc describes a picture of Hodgkins on the floor of the Senate as one of a “lost soul” and a photo of him at an Easter service as a man who’s “found.”
Judge Moss announces a recess to think about the sentence he is about to impose before delivering it.
We're back.

Judge Moss: I do want to stress from the outset that I'm very focused on sentencing you and not everyone else who was present there on that day.
Judge Moss:

"You carried a large red flag with 'Trump 2020' in red letters," he says, saying that he took selfies and raised the flag in salute.

Although Mr. Hodgkins was only one member of the mob, he participated in an attack on "democracy itself," the judge says.
Judge Moss calls it extraordinary that the mob succeeded in delaying certification.

"They did not like what Congress was about to do," the judge says.

Mr. Hodgkins didn't either.

"That is chilling for many reasons," he says.
Judge Moss:

"It will be harder for all of us to convince our children that democracy stands as the immutable foundation" of this country.

"Those are all enormous harms" caused by the events that day.
Judge Moss on the Jan. 6th siege:

"It left a stain that will remain on us and on this country for years to come."

The judge calls it true—"to a point"—that Hodgkins was less culpable than others.
Judge Moss says that he's "less convinced" that he lost his bearings for a short period of time.

He arrived from Tampa on a bus, with goggles and other gear, suggesting that he came prepared for conflict.
Judge Moss:

"He didn't end up there by curiosity or accident."

"He came to impede the certification of an election and he agreed that he did so."
Judge Moss on Hodgkins wielding the Trump flag near the Senate dais: "The symbol of that act was unmistakable."

He was there declaring his loyalty to a single individual rather than the nation, the judge says.
Judge Moss says that people must know that an attack on the Capitol, even if not bearing arms, carries "severe consequences."
Judge Moss says that he will sentence with a "downward variance" from the sentencing guidelines, but not as dramatic as the defense wants.
Judge imposes an eight-month sentence. Story ahead, @lawcrimenews
The story recapping the thread above:

'More Than a Simple Riot': Florida Man Will Spend Eight Months Behind Bars in First Felony Sentencing for the U.S. Capitol Breach lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-si… via @lawcrimenews

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Klasfeld

Adam Klasfeld Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KlasfeldReports

20 Jul
Live coverage

Matthew Grimes is about to have an initial court appearance.

Along with Trump's inaugural committee chair Tom Barrack, Grimes is charged with allegedly acting as an unregistered agent of the UAE.

Background, thread lawandcrime.com/high-profile/f…
Grimes is represented by lawyer Michael Freedman.

Prosecutors want him to remain detained, and they are arguing about that request now.

From the government's letter. Image
AUSA says the scheme involved contacts with the "highest levels of the UAE" and the "highest levels of the United States."

Read the prosecution's letter seeking Grimes's detention here: documentcloud.org/documents/2101…
Read 7 tweets
19 Jul
A man who threatened to assassinate Judge Sullivan over the Michael Flynn case is about to be sentenced.

Frank Caporusso left a voicemail with Chambers threatening: "A hot piece of lead will cut through your skull."

Background via @LambeJerry

Thread lawandcrime.com/high-profile/m…
Caporusso's voicemail is now being played in court.

This is a transcript.
Prosecutor reads a victim statement from Judge Sullivan:

"I never thought that one day, I would write a victim impact statement," Sullivan says, adding he listened to many in his career.

Sullivan: The defendant before you threatened to murder me because of my judicial decisions
Read 11 tweets
12 Jul
Missed the six (!) hour hearing?

Here's a recap:

"A Federal Judge Holds 'Kraken' Lawyers' Feet to the Fire at Sanctions Hearing. Lin Wood Tried to Distance Himself from It All." lawandcrime.com/2020-election/… via @lawcrimenews
For what it's worth, I'm seeing folks claiming that Haller was crying, or asking about whether she did. She sounded nervous and perhaps awkward, with a shaky voice.

More than that? I didn't see or hear it.
As a caveat:

While I listened to the proceedings in full, my eyes weren't entirely fixed upon the screen throughout the entire six-hour ordeal.
Read 4 tweets
12 Jul
Miss the first two-and-half hours of the "Kraken" sanctions hearing? A breakdown:

"A Federal Judge Holds 'Kraken' Lawyers' Feet to the Fire at Sanctions Hearing. Lin Wood Tried to Distance Himself from It All."

More live coverage ahead, @lawcrimenews
lawandcrime.com/2020-election/…
Welcome back, all. Is everyone caffeinated and refreshed?
Judge: "As promised, we will begin with Mr. Wood."

Wood: "What I wanted to make clear is, as I said at the beginning," he does not believe the court has jurisdiction over him and that he did not sign the pleading.

"I do not have a slash-s signature line," Wood adds.
Read 61 tweets
12 Jul
Good morning.

The sanctions hearing of Sidney Powell, Lin Wood, and the rest of the so-called "Kraken" team will begin soon.

Follow along here for the play-by-play, and catch up on the background here @LawCrimeNews.

lawandcrime.com/2020-election/…
The parties are beginning to connect virtually to the proceedings.
Proceedings are beginning in a very bustling Zoom court.

Powell and Wood's co-counsel Stefanie Junttila, Scott Hagerstrom, Julia Haller, Brandon Johnson, Howard Kleinhendler, and Gregory Rohl are also in attendance, by court order.
Read 77 tweets
11 Jul
How many people in the US know that at least 165 people have been charged with assaulting and/or resisting police on Jan. 6th—a number that is growing?

Trump’s alternative reality thrives on millions not knowing or believing that fact, through an atomized and vilified press.
Statistic via DOJ: justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/new…
Political operatives spinning this as like Portland are kindly invited to point to when 165+ people and counting there were charged w/ similar crimes—

—including assaulting police with bear spray, poles, barricades, a baseball bat, Taser and more.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(