I have been trying to google this, but don't have the right language. How does one find a therapist who specializes in working with a service animal to address one's mental challenges?
I got my service animal over a year ago at a suggestion of my psychiatrist (who specializes in meds, and really nothing else. But he is very good at meds and respects I want as little of them as possible.)
I have worked with a service dog trainer for a year. It's made me realize
It's not enough to have a trainer. The trainer I worked with mostly focused on canine good citizenship and a handful of tasks. What I realize now I really need is someone who understands my challenges and can recommend a doggy response.
The training part is easy (just work.) But picking what triggers & responses to train to is harder.
After my service dog trainer retired, I started to work with a regular dog trainer to focus on the good behavior thing. She was a personal trainer before she switched to dogs...
And she spotted me starting to have a panic attack during our training and came up with a response for Nina. It was revelatory.
I need someone who can make those connections.
(and yes, I have found one in my fabulous trainer. But I could use more.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I read the entire thread and have no idea what you are referring to except I’m wildly in favor of all of it.
@rdonoghue I'm now inventing a story about Jue, who forages teacup spider silk.
The teacup spider, called so because it is about the size of your grandmother's teacup, spins a strong and soft silk that takes die marvelously. It is high in demand, but sadly no one can farm the spiders.
Once upon a Time, someone, perhaps Andy Grove, perhaps Peter drucker, came up with a very simple idea. What if we told people what result we wanted and trusted them to figure out how to make that result happen.
They called it managing by objectives. And the big idea was saying, "we'd like to improve engagement." Or "we'd like to make the business successful by becoming the number one name in processors" or "we'd like to make the world's information findable and usable."
And then someone else figured out a good way to format it, a lot like SMART goals. Let's unite the company by having a visionary objective and clear results. And then all these smart people that we've hired can figure out what they should do to make those results happen!
The problem with being a recognized "expert" in OKRs is sometimes I get attacked for something someone else is doing (typically a boss) in the name of "OKRs" that I never recommended or endorsed.
People want to tilt at me for things I've vigorously denounced, like using OKRs in performance reviews, because somehow all of the things wrong with OKRs are my fault.
I do feel bad about these things, and often wonder if I had just found the right words in the book or written a more persuasive essay or given a better talk, things might be different.
I often wonder how many people still use and value @boxesandarrows. It was the first of its kind: when I founded it there were only academic papers and beginner articles on how to make a webpage. @alistapart was mostly focused on code.
We wanted to make a magazine for digital product designers. We eschewed loyalty to any faction, which at the time were mostly UX, information architecture and interaction design. We just wanted to offer useful insights, to share knowledge.
It was design for a service economy: memorable, saleable, repeatable, apparently universal, and slightly vague in the details. | n+1 | nplusonemag.com/?p=11657
"Horst Rittel had convincingly described the folly of trying to define or rationalize design’s “how”; IDEO’s template for design thinking brought back the “how” with a vengeance."
“Gainesville is not a Silicon Valley startup,” one resident told the Alligator, the newspaper of the University of Florida. “Looking good in a magazine is not a marker of true success.”
Since working at Stanford, I've been staring at the design thinking hex-model a bunch. Finally (maybe it was @lauraklein's ranting at me) I see the giant missing puzzle piece.
"Elaborate" is the shortest way to say "huge amounts of fucking detailed thoughtful work."