Brittany Profile picture
20 Jul, 13 tweets, 2 min read
By their own standards, can we now call the TX delegation trip to DC a "super-spreader" event? I have so many questions about all of this at this point.
The term "super-spreader" was always overused, especially during the summer spike. Though large gatherings were banned, we knew it was always small gatherings (like the ones the TX delegation had all week in DC) were the events in which COVID spread quickly.
But the term "super-spreader" was used essentially by the powers that be to describe events they didn't support, and conveniently not used for events they supported. This is all about the hypocrisy of it.
Pelosi used vaccination rates/status in the House to keep a mask mandate when it wasn't necessary- and then "put her office at risk" when they welcomed the TX delegation. That's the hypocrisy. Right there in a nutshell.
And people in DC got to make the rules and impose them on others, and relax them when they weren't convenient for them. This is essentially the hair salon part 2.
It was never fair, and it was never right that the rule makers got to be the only rule breakers without real consequence.
And it's also true that you can follow every rule (maybe everyone in the TX delegation and all of the staff members were vaxxed), and still get COVID. We've seen it repeatedly.
The point is to highlight the hypocrisy, not the fact that they got infected. At some point we will all probably get COVID. The point is the hypocrisy. Flying without a mask while kicking off toddlers and their families for non-compliance. It's the two sets of rules.
And that there are some who have to experience/made to feel shame for catching a highly transmissible virus, while others are given a pass or a shrug.
I'm going to be honest: seeing the TX delegation maskless in a plane was really hurtful. How many families with toddlers have been kicked off of planes this year for just that? How many kids harassed for hours to keep their masks on for a long flight?
We haven't been able to fly back to VA yet to see family and friends because I have a child who hates masks and is done with them. I am terrified to be "that person" kicked off a flight because my kid "won't comply".
So many families have had miserable flight experiences, or like mine haven't flown yet, and they just smiled and got to skirt the rules. Rules that we impose on toddlers without mercy.
It's always the hypocrisy. The rule makers get to be the rule breakers, and the rest of us are along for the ride waiting to see what the next rule will be and how we have to adjust our lives (and the lives of our kids/family) accordingly.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brittany

Brittany Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @bccover

22 Jul
The messaging should be: "if you are vaccinated, you are protected from the worst symptoms of the virus, it's effective and you don't need to wear a mask. If you are unvaccinated, we recommend wearing an N95 mask." That's it, anything else is madness.
We were told not to wear masks to be able to save the supply for medical professionals. They shrugged and didn't say anything when people were wearing cloth masks (that are basically a joke). A year and a half in with nearly 50% of Americans vaxxed, it's time to say N95 is it.
If we are really concerned with protecting people, they need a mask that actually protects them. The vaccine protects those that have gotten it, and those who are still vulnerable to the virus and not vaxxed need an N95. That's what will actually protect them.
Read 8 tweets
21 Apr
Something we need to do better on: mental health support for children in foster care, for foster families, and for families of origin. It's way tougher than it should be to get support in these circumstances, and often the support you ultimately get is insufficient.
Foster parents often get a bad rap, but lots of us (I'm a former foster parent) fight TIRELESSLY for these kids, and we are met with endless roadblocks.
We are relentless in our desire to get kids who have been through the worst situations you can imagine the help they need. Oftentimes it's too little, too late (if anyone even listens to our demands).
Read 4 tweets
20 Apr
I'd also venture a guess that there's a decent number of people that are holding out on the vaccine bc they don't trust their leaders to lift restrictions anytime soon and they have seen post after post talking about the experiences with side effects and they are putting it off.
I think it was with good intentions and a desire to be honest that people posted on FB about every side effect they experienced- but I have talked to people who are hesitant and said that plus knowing it won't change the rules are why they're waiting.
They are hoping that enough other will get vaccinated so they don't have to, and they won't have to deal with the side effects. A year in, and the absence of any kind of hope/goal still plagues us.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(