One of the core problems with American governance is overfunding. The government has FAR too much money, by an order of magnitude. It uses that excess cash to make itself bigger. It is insulated from every force that would compel greater honesty or efficiency.
The government is so flabby that it can barely move. Its nerve endings are deadened from the layers of fat that protect it from all consequences. It can't actually *do* anything useful, and it collapses in a quivering heap at the first touch of genuine crisis, as in the pandemic.
Overfunded government agencies constantly seek new "missions" so they can demand even more funding, while neglecting their core missions. The sums flowing through these agencies are so immense that corruption has become all but undetectable.
If necessity is the mother of invention, then Big Government is the motherless monstrosity: it invents nothing because it never feels the sting of necessity. Its only response to any pain inputs it dimly feels through its layers of fat is to howl for more money.
Worst of all, excess funding for the State is inevitably weaponized against the people. Rest assured that overfunded government will always use its excess cash to spread ideologies favorable to the Ruling Class, nullify accountability, and subdue the public.
We're having huge problems with toxic garbage like Critical Race Theory because the overfunded government has vast amounts of cash on hand to pay stooges to disseminate it. These ideas aren't spread by devoted monks. They're profitable grifts funded by taxpayer loot.
Also, it's no coincidence that as the overfunding of government accelerated over the past half-century, more and more of the State moved beyond the reach of voters. More power is wielded by people you will never get to vote against. Vast piles of taxpayer loot made that possible.
It takes huge amounts of excess money - funding above and beyond anything reasonably needed by dedicated professionals to handle the core duties of a properly limited State - to construct cyclopean bureaucracies. Generations of bureaucrats had to be hired at fabulous expense.
Overfunding also makes anarcho-tyranny possible. Those lefty government apparatchiks cheerfully throwing you to the wolves by refusing to enforce criminal law are not worried about losing their jobs, or their department funding.
Only a morbidly obese State can fuss over punishing citizens for microaggressions against its interests while leaving violent crime unpunished because it suits the ruling ideology. Filthy rich governments can afford to be irresponsible because they don't fear the people.
Overfunded governments have a tendency to descend into fascism because they have the money to dominate and control private industry. As the State grows titanic beyond reason, the private economy naturally fuses into politics until they are completely symbiotic.
Overfunding helps the State create an ecosystem of private ideological organizations that sustain the bureaucracy. You see this ALL THE TIME in modern America: regulatory capture, revolving doors between the State and friendly think-tanks, academia as an arm of the ruling Party.
The ideological organizations killing America are tumors growing from the corpulent State, drinking taxpayer blood to finance political crusades that serve the interests of statism. Choke off the public money supply, and a lot of that junk would vanish with remarkable speed.
Trying to reform this government by giving it even MORE money is lunacy. At this point, you can bet that at least 90 cents of every new dollar you give Washington will be spent on squeezing the next dollar from you, not on "building" anything useful.
Spending money responsibly would actually be against the interests of Fat Uncle Sam. If you give him $5 trillion for "infrastructure" and he builds $5 trillion of useful stuff with it, how will he be able to complain that he needs more money for infrastructure next time?
We're FAR beyond the point where the people have any hope of punishing the State for failing to spend your money wisely. The very notion is laughable. It's ALL overfunding now. They have many times the money they need to perform their Constitutional duties. You can't hurt them.
The bloated State doesn't have to turn a profit, deliver value for money, balance a budget, monitor its "investments" carefully, increase its efficiency, or worry about losing unhappy "customers." Every force that could possibly compel meaningful reform has been neutralized.
Take any company you hate doing business with, and ask how much worse it would be if they could charge anything they want, force you to do business with them, punish you for criticizing them, and never had to worry about going bankrupt. That's the overfunded State in a nutshell.
And as you might have noticed, the middle class suffers the most from government overfunding. The rich find ways to profit from it, the poor get their benefits and a pass from paying taxes. It's YOU, right in the middle, that get squashed when Fat Uncle Sam rolls over in bed.
The money to feed overfunded government invariably comes from the most vibrant and productive sector of the economy, the middle. The negative effects of its foolish regulations are felt most keenly there. Every dollar of overfunding is a weapon against independence. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

20 Jul
How can anyone think a State-sanctioned cartel of corporations, acting in unison to suppress speech that threatens the ruling Party, is consistent with the First Amendment? What inalienable right could not be easily stripped from the American people with such tactics?
Democrats are asserting that our Constitution provides absolutely no protection against State-directed mega-corporations acting as instruments of ruling Party orthodoxy.

The correct term for a system where capital is privately owned, but controlled by the State, is fascism.
So the Left is telling us: Surprise! After hundreds of years, we've just discovered the U.S. Constitution offers no protection whatsoever against fascist tyranny! As long as the State uses politically-controlled corporations as its agents, your silly little "rights" mean nothing!
Read 7 tweets
19 Jul
"Vaccine hesitancy" is constantly discussed as a matter of irrational fear or political bias, but some people are just trying to balance costs against benefits. They might be persuaded to change their analysis, but calling them crazy or stupid is bound to alienate them.
Contrary to thinking inside the government and social media bubbles, not all information flows through the Internet. At this point, many people have personal acquaintances who have experienced significant side effects from vaccination, from brief illness to serious reactions.
Some of the "vaccine hesitant" are balancing these costs against the perceived benefits of vaccination - or more precisely, their perception of the risks from not getting vaccinated - and deciding not to get the shots. They made it through the hell year without vaccination.
Read 12 tweets
9 Jul
Can anyone doubt that American culture is simply *weaker* than it was a generation ago? We can't even handle the name of Boba Fett's spaceship anymore. As totalitarian politics advances, culture withers.
There is a certain grim logic to it. Totalitarianism is the politicization of everything. As it advances, it leaves less room to say, draw, sing, or film anything that doesn't advance the agenda, damage the enemies of the elite, or deliver an approved political payload.
Culture could be seen as a process of asking questions, challenging preconceptions, speculating and mocking, dreaming and guessing. None of that is allowed under totalitarianism, which provides all the answers and requires culture to work backwards from its conclusions.
Read 11 tweets
8 Jul
The battle to define freedom must be won before the war to defend it can be fought.

That's why totalitarian statists and outright fascists can look you in the eye and claim they love "freedom" and see themselves on a patriotic crusade to preserve it.
America was founded on a vision of individual freedom, built from the ground up. The Founders tried to isolate the essential characteristics of individual sovereignty and write a Constitution that would limit the power of government to damage those vital freedoms.
The notion of "inalienable rights" is an example of building the definition of freedom from the ground up. These rights are inherent to free men and women and cannot be compromised, so a just and moral government will fully respect them.
Read 19 tweets
6 Jul
The utter failure of nation-building in Afghanistan, where the Taliban is rolling up the whole country with little resistance while U.S. troops are still boarding the planes for home, has profound implications for Western civilization in an age of globalism and mass migration.
The great nation-building crusade of the neocons was a complete and absolute disaster. 20 years, billions spent, so many lives lost, and we made few lasting impressions on Afghanistan. We walked across sand, and now the evening tide of savagery rolls in to erase our footprints.
Iraq teeters on the verge of becoming an Iranian satrapy, with Tehran's militia proxies brazenly attacking American positions. Obama's nation-building in Libya unleashed a decade-long hell of warlords and terrorists that will now become part of Turkey's Islamist empire.
Read 18 tweets
2 Jul
The next few decades will see an ideological and economic struggle in which nationalism is the most important weapon. Hyper-nationalist states like China have a huge advantage over neurotic self-loathing post-nationalist Western nations that have unilaterally disarmed themselves.
All conflict is a test of will. The battle ends when the enemy loses his will to fight. Nationalism is a vital reservoir of will for ideological conflicts. The new century's authoritarian horror, Communist China, is determined not to be defeated as the Soviet Union was.
Meanwhile, the West is filled with teams that can barely take their own side. The very concept of national cohesion is under sustained, blistering attack all over the "free world" - and it is very clearly becoming less free as that scorched-earth campaign proceeds.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(