In China, suburban garages don't factor in the lore of computing history the way they do in the U.S. But prisons do – at least, one particular prison in which a Chinese engineer was sentenced to solitary confinement for thought crimes against Mao /1
His name was Zhi Bingyi and, during long and anxiety-ridden days, months and years of solitude, he made a breakthrough that helped launch China’s personal computing revolution: he helped make it possible to type Chinese with a QWERTY keyboard. /2
Unsure if he would ever see his wife again, and with no work to occupy his mind, Zhi filled the long hours staring at an 8-character poster on the wall:
坦白从宽,抗拒从严
‘Leniency For Those Who Confess, Severity For Those Who Resist’
By the 100th reading – perhaps the 1,000th – Zhi began to explode these characters in his mind. The first character (坦), for example, could be readily divided into two distinct parts: 土 and 旦, and then further still into + and −
Zhi managed to get hold of a pen, but paper was impossible to find. Instead, he used the lid of a teacup, which his captors provided him to drink hot water. When turned over, Zhi discovered, the lid was large enough to fit a few dozen Latin letters.
Sino-US normalisation brought was an influx of US-built computers and computing equipment into the PRC, personal computers in particular. US companies regarded China as an immense, untapped market for the ‘personal computing revolution’.
Suddenly, Zhi and his teacup hallucinations took on immense real-world applications. The ‘spelling’ system he made might be the key to cracking the code of QWERTY-based Chinese computing.
Zhi came on the radar of engineers and technologists in the PRC, as well as two foreign organisations – the Olympia Werke company, a towering presence in the history of German precision engineering, and the Graphics Arts Research Foundation in the US.
Zhi was sitting in a darkened cell, with long stretches of boredom punctuated by moments of dread, tracing out ephemeral alphabetic codes on the underside of a teacup, and eventually dreaming of a fully mature Chinese-language information environment.
Everyone in my feed seems to agree with this article, here and on FB, so I should probably keep quiet. Instead, and at risk of a pile-on, here's a thread on why I disagree. 🧵
1) it's definitely true that we profs are terrible videographers and editors when compared to professionals. But, for the most part, we are also terrible lecturers and lesson designers. Having room to grow is not a reason not to do something. It's a reason to try harder.
2) I’m not sure that the purpose of the lecture hall in the wake of the print revolution was dialogue between instructor and students. The roundtable and salon yes, but not the 200-person amphitheater. Over time, lectures became more about dialogue. There is no "golden age."
“What Atlas wrote was unequivocally wrong, and yet Stanford's official statement was insipid and spineless. Gmail's AI auto-responder could have done better job.” /2
“So many of us love Stanford--truly love this place--and what we're yearning for is leadership. True, heartfelt, blood-temperature leadership.” /3
Go to Google
Enter this in your search bar, exactly: “XYZ” AND “Finding Aid”
Replace XYZ with your phrase, name, term
Enjoy!
90% of results will be from Archives, Special Collections, etc.
Pro Tip: run multiple searches, using different spellings/variations of your term
Pro Pro Trip: you can also use multiple terms. Just run the search as “XYZ” AND “ABC” AND “Finding Aid”
And don’t be a greedy researcher: RT this tip RIGHT NOW :)
6 years ago, Congressional Republicans & @GOP tried to drag my research, and my name, through the mud. I've never told this story, but now it's time. I also made a video about it, which you can check out here: THREAD /1
A bit of background: I wrote a book called the Chinese Typewriter, which came out @mitpress a few years back. A history of Chinese information technology from the 1930s to the 1950s. A sequel to the book, all about Chinese computing, is coming @mitpress as well. /2
When I was still an untenured Assistant Professor @Stanford I was feverishly applying for sabbatical grants (I'm sure many readers know the feeling). One of the grants I applied for was the @NSF grant for humanists and social scientists /3