All for a storm which doesn't yet exist.
Here we are now calling this #3rdStorm. The first 2 being #Cempaka (causing catastrophic and lethal flooding in south China) and #INFA which keeps getting stronger and more menacing and has the Eastern seaboard of China in its path.
The image above from the tip of the tail of #INFA's widening gyre. And this is where 3rd storm is expected to appear (i.e. where the Cyclonegenesis is expected to begin), albeit now later than originally expected, which for me at least is now a source of hope. Here's a live view.
If you squint & look very closely at the nook of the corner to the left of the tail faint traces of what could be rotation are there.
& If there's a tropical low in there then its a mystery why it hasn't been designated by JTWC as an area of interest requiring investigation yet.
A low if it is present should be rotating counter clockwise. And once we see that we will know #3rdstorm is forming.
I can see two changes in the latest model forecast.
1/ The first is that #3rdStorm development has slowed.
Left: Today's 6pm forecast for 25th July 00hrs
Right: Yesterday's forecast for 25th July 00hrs
And the 2nd difference is the intensity forecast for #INFA which is now significantly higher.
And it seems likely that it is this that is making the difference in the forecast.
But since the initiation data for the latest model was run, #INFA has now strengthened still further. And it could weaken at any time too. Very Severe Cyclones can do that. Or change direction. But in this case it doesn't seem likely that #INFA will weaken.
And here is the full reasoning behind their current intensity and track forecasts.
"THE GREATEST UNCERTAINTY IN THE FORECAST IS
WHETHER OR NOT THE STORM TRACKS INLAND OR RECURVES ALONG THE COAST NEAR SHANGHAI AND TURNS TOWARD THE YELLOW SEA*."
NOTE: The Yellow Sea is the sea west of Korea and it leads towards Beijing.
The final part of the discussion is on the models.
"MODELS DISC.: JTWC TRACK FORECAST LIES CLOSE TO MODEL CONSENSUS AND THE ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEAN. THE INTENSITY GUIDANCE IS IN FAIRLY TIGHT AGREEMENT AND CONSISTENT IN TREND. THE FORECAST STAYS IN MIDDLE OF THE GUIDANCE PACKAGE."
The model shown above is the latest ECMWF above.
The GFS has a completely different view however. And the forecasts I have been mainly using have been the GFS forecasts. The GFS shows #INFA skirting the coast, far enough way to remain strong. A worst case prediction.
To make things worse in the GFS forecast (see previous tweet) #INFA slows down and does a little shimmy whilst off shore from Shanghai.
But one thing the two models agree on is #3rdStorm. The ECMWF has a slightly worse trajectory for the Olympics, but the timing, intensity and track of this (yet to appear) fast moving, not particularly strong storm is effectively identical.
In the JTWC forecast they say
"JTWC TRACK FORECAST LIES CLOSE TO MODEL CONSENSUS AND THE >> ECMWF ENSEMBLE MEAN" <>
This is the ECMWF ensemble mean model.
And this is the EPS Ensemble models long-range rainfall forecast. Here we see that nearly all of Japan is forecast to get rainfall of 2 inches with peaks at a more modest 7.5 inches (20cm) but still a lot.
But this could well explain the lack of interest in the professionals in #3rdStorm. Everyone's eyes are entirely on #INFA. Here is the GEFS (GFS ensemble) model rainfall solution which is also not too bad for Japan.
Here are the latest (single model) rainfall solutions for the big two global models. 10 days
Left: ECMWF
Right: GFS
Which are similar except in relation to the Yellow Sea trajectory question. For China though the GFS model is much better.
All that being said, I am confused as to how this PWAT forecast doesn't result more rain over Japan. Especially the bit at the end.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ok so this is a bit weird, but in a kinda chill way so do bare with me and and I will be happy to answer questions afterwards. It’s about a castle on a virtual island in a massive online role playing game called Evony and it involves a possible but speculative discussion about @elonmusk and @X.
All will be revealed but first a picture or four actually from the game. More will come.
Ok. So here’s what I think is going on in a nutshell. I think elonmusk has invested in a MMORPG: a “Massive Multimedia Online Role Playing Game” which is a bit of a mouthful, called EVONY.
I liked its Twitter ads and finally clicked. It’s huge. Someone else can do the business story here which I am sure is interesting too.
But the this bit is weird.
The mysterious knight on the red horse arrived this morning beside my castle and he had some treasure.
I hadn’t a clue who it was so I grabbed the treasure and tried to kill the horse and rider as that’s what you do. But we got smashed badly.
This interview with working class Uk financial markets savant Gary Stevenson - who has just published an autobiography - is seriously terrifying. He now has a @YouTube channel it seems and I’ll post a link shortly.
James O'Brien meets Gary Stevenson | LBC via @YouTube
His prognosis for the collapse of social democratic nation state finances due to the very sharp rise in income distribution inequality in the UK is horrific.
The consequences of unfettered transfers of money over decades due to neoliberal economics initially and more recently quantitative easing driven transfers of wealth from the middle class to the top 5% of the population is the cause of his concern.
It’s very hard to imagine what can be done politically to rebalance this.
Thomas Piketty’s thesis which among other things warned about all of this based on long term historical analysis of wealth inequality appears to be colliding with Western Civilisation in a manner that threatens the very foundations of that civilisation.
Gary’s YouTube channel which addresses all this is here.
Well this was actually pretty good… very little crazy right wing stuff - none in fact - some light criticism of wokeness and a consensus that Hitler was a socialist or communist dictator not a rightwing liberal fascist - mercifully no discussion of Greenland Panama or Canada
The bit at the end was actually quite nice and agreement about ending the wars in Gaza and Ukraine.
Importantly and probably deliberately there was very little to zero overt electioneering - a little bit of criticism of Weidel’s Spitzencandidat competition from Weidle but nothing extreme.
So nothing imo that could be seen as being election interference IMO - nor any reason for the DSA to be concerned or to get involved.
I didn’t even hear any particularly overt endorsement that went beyond that you might hear in passing in a podcast interview.
It ended with a discussion of mars - Elon’s favourite subject of conversation - which was quite interesting including a reference to the Hitchhikers guide to the Galaxy series and Douglas Adams.
From Weidel’s point of view though there was a lot of positive moderate exposure of her party and probably around 200k + listeners. Which may give her a bounce in the polls.
Also the final segment talking about space was quite delightful and genuine and portrayed the AFD Leader in a positive light.
And I’d say the two of them have both found a new friend.
This is an update thread on this OCCRP story on @StateDept and @USAID funding for several large investigative journalism projects which has had a lot of downstream impacts it seems. Especially in Europe,
The underlying original story about govt funding for investigative journalism projects was initially flagged by @ryangrim.
This organisation - OCCRP that not many people seemed to have been aware of - was responsible for a series of outstanding investigative journalism consortia projects including the Panama papers.
This is a leaked rough cut of the NDR (German public broadcaster north west Germany) investigation into what happened With the OCCRP story.
It was never officially published but was recently leaked publicly by Wikileaks.
With the benefit of hindsight arguably Wikileaks ought to be the international organisation that coordinates these large investigative consortia, though it’s not clear that they want to do so.
What is clear from the fallout from all of this is that the system that was in place for running these consortia is no longer fit for purpose.