No biggie...
Just shuttled some S genes around to see which ones will kill monkey cells.
Let’s do this in a BL2 lab over in China while it’s outlawed here in the States.
In all of my publishing career, I’ve never seen a paper get edited 5 years later to remove references and flip the meaning of critical sentences.
This is a panicked attempt to cover.
Well, at least they had the ethics committee look over the animal rights.
Wonder what else they should have thought about?
Nothing to see here.
“Tony is right. Dr. Paul is wrong.”
Why would this respected virologist dig their heels in like this?
Maybe this is a hard statement to back off of.
This is also hard to Ignore.
I tried to engage Daszak on this but I was blocked in 2 words.
Looks like Twitter isn’t letting him have any part of this white-washing.
Your response to peoples request for your qPCR protocol is misinformation.
No transparency on your methods but we can already see that you are using only 1 assay in the vector (Kan gene) so you are under estimating the load 100X.
You should know this by now as Speicher et al published this a year ago.
@TGAgovau This is misinformation. Dr. David Speicher's latest test used RNaseA. There is no RNA interfering with the fluorometry.
Did you not even read the report?
Life must be good at the TGA when you can be a year behind all the time.
@TGAgovau Part of GMP and ISO is having your protocol open for inspection.
Is SV40 Large Tumor Antigen required for SV40 origin of replication activity.
No
Here we detect Pfizer plasmid DNA in a colon tumor biopsy 1 year after vaccination.
And its not small amounts of DNA. Its so much DNA that it can only be explained by plasmid amplification post vaccination or genome integration and amplification.
Variants are found in the SV40 Promoter that do not exist when you sequence the vaccine directly suggestive of replication errors once transfected into mammalian cells.
The low wattage take that any attention given to GOF steals attention from ‘my pet thesis’, is two logical fallacies in one.
False dichotomy and a zero sum fallacy.
It is possible to be concerned about both GOF and lockdown tyranny at the same time.
Like chewing gum and walking.
There are usually 2 reasons such nonsense gets blathered about.
1)someone doesn’t want you to look at GOF.
2)marketing of substacks requires one differentiate from what’s currently capturing attention and appear divergent.
The reasons given NOT to look at GOF are rooted in denialism and molecular biology fairy tales.
‘RNA viruses can’t spread because <insert pseudo profound bullshit like quasi species swarm>’
When you show them evidence of measles and influenza having a higher mutation rate…