Kevin McKernan Profile picture
Jul 22, 2021 9 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Watch the long list of dishonest virologists shill for Tony to protect their field from getting hyper regulated and restricted.

This is protectionism.
No biggie...
Just shuttled some S genes around to see which ones will kill monkey cells.

Let’s do this in a BL2 lab over in China while it’s outlawed here in the States.
In all of my publishing career, I’ve never seen a paper get edited 5 years later to remove references and flip the meaning of critical sentences.
This is a panicked attempt to cover.
Well, at least they had the ethics committee look over the animal rights.

Wonder what else they should have thought about?
Nothing to see here.
“Tony is right. Dr. Paul is wrong.”

Why would this respected virologist dig their heels in like this?
Maybe this is a hard statement to back off of.
This is also hard to Ignore.
I tried to engage Daszak on this but I was blocked in 2 words.
Looks like Twitter isn’t letting him have any part of this white-washing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kevin McKernan

Kevin McKernan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Kevin_McKernan

Oct 18
Your response to peoples request for your qPCR protocol is misinformation.
No transparency on your methods but we can already see that you are using only 1 assay in the vector (Kan gene) so you are under estimating the load 100X.

You should know this by now as Speicher et al published this a year ago.Image
@TGAgovau This is misinformation. Dr. David Speicher's latest test used RNaseA. There is no RNA interfering with the fluorometry.
Did you not even read the report?
Life must be good at the TGA when you can be a year behind all the time. Image
@TGAgovau Part of GMP and ISO is having your protocol open for inspection.

Rules for thee but not for me at the TGA.
Read 4 tweets
Oct 14
Is SV40 Large Tumor Antigen required for SV40 origin of replication activity.

No Image
Here we detect Pfizer plasmid DNA in a colon tumor biopsy 1 year after vaccination.

And its not small amounts of DNA. Its so much DNA that it can only be explained by plasmid amplification post vaccination or genome integration and amplification. Image
Variants are found in the SV40 Promoter that do not exist when you sequence the vaccine directly suggestive of replication errors once transfected into mammalian cells. Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 17
Just take the 500ng Pfizer sample
If you assume the medium fragment size is 200bp.

How many DNA molecules per dose?
Green is after RNAseA removes the RNA.
So 500ng for one Pfizer lot and 1500ng for Moderna(right).

That’s high for Moderna. They are usually cleaner. Image
NEB DNA calculator-
500ng at 200bp

2.4 Trillion DNA molecules per dose wrapped in LNPs. Image
Read 4 tweets
Aug 26
This is flat out evil.
Imagine whitewashing many deaths of the unborn for a few academic points.
Author now has a Kush Job at Pfizer Image
Read 4 tweets
Jul 9
What a bomb shell.
@CanningPharm sent this to me. Image
Is it a Gene Therapy?
They certainly used plasmids from their Gene Therapy Division.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
.@Double_Christ @dystopian_DU @TamaraUgo @sonia_elijah @Jikkyleaks
Read 6 tweets
Jun 4
The low wattage take that any attention given to GOF steals attention from ‘my pet thesis’, is two logical fallacies in one.
False dichotomy and a zero sum fallacy.
It is possible to be concerned about both GOF and lockdown tyranny at the same time.
Like chewing gum and walking.
There are usually 2 reasons such nonsense gets blathered about.

1)someone doesn’t want you to look at GOF.

2)marketing of substacks requires one differentiate from what’s currently capturing attention and appear divergent.
The reasons given NOT to look at GOF are rooted in denialism and molecular biology fairy tales.
‘RNA viruses can’t spread because <insert pseudo profound bullshit like quasi species swarm>’

When you show them evidence of measles and influenza having a higher mutation rate…
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(