Lately, I've been reading a lot about parents/caregivers' perspectives of their children's communication disorders and their experiences around them.
For example, De Lopez, @Renagalway, et al. asked parents how they made sense of their children's speech and language disorders and how they described them across 10 countries pubs.asha.org/doi/10.1044/20…
Parents described their children's impairments using specific terms but did not use diagnostic labels often, they described impacts on daily activities and self-esteem, and they perceived improvements over time but were concerned about persistence of some difficulties.
The authors write, "These results suggest that it is important that practitioners listen to, acknowledge, and value parental perspectives and aim to provide services tailored to the needs of parents."
Mothers reported confusion over diagnostic labels, distress about their children's problems, and did not always trust or understand their children's SLP. They did, however, report high satisfaction with the services that their children were receiving.
The authors write, "When parents fail to understand the information they receive, they lack a common ground from which to communicate their concerns or desires for their children."
"It is also difficult, if not essentially impossible, to effectively advocate for your child if you cannot explain their problem to family, friends, teachers, and employers."
As the authors discuss, a common label like #DevLangDis may resolve some of these issues, but it depends on how we implement it across settings and how we account for system-level barriers (policies, local constraints, etc.).
Caregivers reported lack of information about diagnosis and practical implications (e.g., academic performance, long-term outcomes), but adequate information about SLP services.
Overall, these and other similar studies raise the following issues. 1) It's important to improve communication and information sharing between SLPs and parents/caregivers, especially around diagnosis and functional outcomes.
2) These issues won't improve if we put the responsibility solely on SLPs. This concerns ALL OF US and we must work together to remove barriers to advocacy, policy, and service delivery.
3) We do excellent work to improve the uptake of EBP into routine school-based practice but somehow parents/caregivers are rarely part of the decision process, one that eventually aims to improve their children's lives.
Why? Do we think that they don't have time? Or that they aren't interested? Or that they wouldn't understand? Or that we're the experts and they just need to listen to us?
Such assumptions are harmful for science and for practice. Because parents are our best allies. Take for example the incredible work that Decoding Dyslexia is doing! Because of their efforts, we now have legislation that mandates early ID and support of children with #dyslexia.
What does this imply for implementation work? That we must see parents/caregivers/families not as informants or describers, but as partners and decision makers.
Active family involvement, informed family choice, acknowledgement of family's strengths, respect, continuous communication and sharing of resources can lead to many positive child and family outcomes but can also transform #ImpSci toward inclusiveness and equity.
We have so many mountains to move to ensure that every child has an opportunity to succeed in school and life. Parents and caregivers can help us move those mountains.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Welcome to #ImplementationThursdays!!! Last week, we discussed a bit about what #ImpSci is and what it can do to improve uptake of #EBP. This week, I want to focus on implementation strategies - things that you do to change something in your context and facilitate implementation.
Usually, when you do #ImpSci work, you begin by examining what in your target context influences implementation and whether it is acting as a barrier or a facilitator. Identifying barriers to implementation is important because these are the things that you want to change.
And the way to change them, eliminate them, is by using implementation strategies: strategies that address barriers and enhance the adoption of a particular program. Here is a nice summary by @ImpSciUW impsciuw.org/implementation…
A very interesting talk by @drbeatricehayes on children's social media presence, benefits, risks, and impact on well-being and mental health at #WorkingTogether2021.
Online presence is associated with both benefits - friendships, exploration of identify - and risks - misjudging trustworthiness, cyberbullying.
Findings show that adults (parents, teachers) are very concerned by the "stranger danger" element but it may take away from other risks that should be equally addressed.
Problem: about 20% of adolescents around the world struggle with reading preventing them to access the curriculum efficiently and demonstrate learning (e.g., exams)
Longitudinal data shows that "...consistent rank order amongst individuals (high stability), significant progress over time, and evidence that achievement gaps between the least and most able adolescents were narrowing." tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Welcome to #ImplementationThursdays!!! This week, instead of reviewing an article, I decided to introduce implementation science and compile useful resources for anyone who might be interested. Here we go! #ELAchat#ImpSci#DevLangDis#Dyslexia
Let's start with the problem. The problem is that high-quality, evidence-based programs do not always end up in routine practice like schools. For example, a review showed that it takes on average 17 years for only 14% of research to be integrated into practice.
17 YEARS AND ONLY 14%! This means that programs that we know work are not used in routine practice and do not benefit those who need them. This means that our children with #DevLangDis and #Dyslexia for example do not receive high-quality services.
I'm sorry to hurt your feelings but teaching spelling is not "unnecessary", "useless", or "outdated". Let me tell you why! #spellingmatters#EBP#ELAchat
1/ Think about the role that spelling plays in our daily life. Notes, homework, grocery lists, texting, tweeting, medical forms, job applications etc. Spelling instruction must be part of the curriculum so that no student feels incompetent and embarrassed.
2/ And by 'spelling instruction', I don't mean endless lists of words to memorize. This is a disservice to the richness and beauty of the English language and every language. I mean instruction that is explicit and systematic.
The February issue of @ASHAleader features responses to the December 2018 articles on SLI vs. #devlangdis. I selected some quotes that I consider powerful, but I invite you to read the full letters and continue to be part of this important discussion. #DLD#DLDawareness
Elena Plante writes “Cut scores that accurately identify disorders are specific to the test used and can be very different across tests.”
Rebecca Vance writes “…by excluding children with nonverbal IQ scores between 75 and 85, researchers cannot expect results to generalize to the populations served by practicing clinicians.”