I did a couple of mock interviews for people applying to RA/Economicky type stuff, and just a couple of observations:
1. If you find a list of questions floating around, or compile it from your own interview, don't just read it and go "oh yeah I know this one", even if you do know it. Record yourself answering out loud. Watch it. Say it again two more times. Then record yourself answering again.
It will make you a LOT more confident in answering, will avoid a lot of uhm and ahms. And even if the question they ask you is slightly different it will be well trodden ground.
2. Whether it's a live or zoom interview, MAKE EYE CONTACT/LOOK AT YOUR INTERVIEWER IN THE SCREEN. I can't stress this enough. This isn't some kind of insurance salesmen ploy. If you don't look at your interviewer you can't see if he lights up at something you say.
If you don't see them light up, you won't know to expand on that issue. You also won't get the confidence boost from seeing the point land. And neither of you will get that moment of "connection" when you recognize a like minded/hearted person.
I realize making eye contact is difficult for some people, but it's like "eye on the ball" if you want to catch a long pass. YOU CANNOT REACT TO WHAT YOU DON'T SEE, and an interview is largely about gauging mutual interaction. Also you won't catch any warning signs that...
... the interviewer might be a bad of employer from YOUR point of view.
Ask a friend to refer you to a friend that you have never met, and do the mock interview with them.
Much like throwing a basketball, professional speaking TAKES PRACTICE.
3. Remember that it's a numbers game. Most interviews won't pan out. But try to learn from each one. Make a not of the questions you received and add them to your list for practice. Also note any answers that seemed to make a positive impact, and try to nudge the conversation...
... in that direction next time, if vaguely appropriate. Note that particularly if you're applying for e.g. an RA job for a professor in EU, USA, Canada, Australia, etc, things that might seem mundane to you might actually be extremely relevant for them.
E.g. you might think your experience working at the city council of your town was not terribly exciting, but the fact that you would know which city official to ask for permission to run a survey for teachers could save months of time, or a trip, to your employer.
It's hard to know what is or isn't relevant, which is why it would be good practice for professors to be specific about the project in the job ad. Failing that, you can look at the other research projects of the faculty member, or ask them directly.
"Do you have any questions for us?" The answer to this is "yes". Ask more about the project, from both a practical and academic aspect.
"Is it part of a broader research agenda, and which direction are you taking it in?"
"What is the state of the art in the research on this?"
"Will I be collaborating with other RAs, and where are they?"
"Will there be weekly all-hands meetings, or do we get tasked and report one on one?"
"How often do you expect to visit my country for this project, is there anything I could do to make these visit more productive?"
"what are some papers that I could read to understand your research goals and methodology? {SUPER BONUS EXTRA POINTS IF YOU ALREADY KNOW SOME OF THIS LITERATURE AND MENTION IT "Oh, so this is related to that Smith and Brown paper on water pumps in Uganda right?}
How could you possibly know the literature? Because you read the job ad carefully to figure out what the project is about, and skimmed the introductions and literature reviews of their paper, so you have some idea of what they find interesting. You don't need to do this...
... , and it won't always work out, but putting in the effort that makes it more likely will also prepare you for the interview in other ways.

Also ask questions about how long they expect various phases of the projects to end, whether you should block time off...
... for specific deadlines that will need more work on your part, etc.
Basically show them that you're thinking already of how you can be effective in your role. It also makes them thing past "Is this the person I want" to "how will I use this person after I hire them"
Once you do get a job, and you've been working at it a while and produced some good value for your employer, if the position is part time it should be perfectly reasonable for you to ask if you could take on additional tasks, and if not if they could recommend you to colleagues..
... or coauthors. This is fine even if the project is ongoing, but in that case know that it is more likely to work if you have been very consistent in delivering what was asked for in the agreed time frame.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrea Matranga

Andrea Matranga Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @andreamatranga

10 Aug
Tomorrow at 9PM LA time, I will be presenting an updated version of my Neolithic paper at the Quantitative History Webinar Series at Hong Kong university. You can register here: asiaglobalinstitute.hku.hk/eventdetail/qu… Image
The four main questions I will try to answer:
1. Why did seven places invent agriculture around the same time?
2. Why wasn't it invented in the previous tens of thousands of years prior?
3. What did the places that invented have in common?
4. Why were farmers shorter than H-Gs? ImageImage
One of the constraints of ANY theory of the Neolithic as a global phenomenon is that it needs to be sufficiently specific to explain those aspects of the Neolithic that all independent inventions share, yet sufficiently broad to allow for the large differences between them.
Read 4 tweets
9 Aug
Costco just put out one of the best mass market olive oils ever, made from DNA-tracked Tuscan olives at $13/L Meanwhile Italian bottlers are selling Spanish and Tunisian oil counting on consumers thinking it's Italian. Image
Let's face it, in this case Costco out-italianed the Italians. They didn't need to do this. No offence, but it's rje US. They could have put far less care into this and they stil would have sold loads.
I think this is really an investment in market development. They want to TEACH their members what great oil tastes like, so they will never buy another.
Read 4 tweets
2 Aug
Two things can simultaneously be true. Most carbonaras that are made would improve with the addition of cream. And yet its addition is always a mistake.
To pull off correctly, the carbonara requires achieving a number of rather difficult goals. A creamy sauce requires a the egg to achieve a temperature above 60 C but below 80 C. The pecorino will have its own temperature ranges depending on how aged it is. You need a specific...
... range of cooking water, with a specific range of starch in it, otherwise the emulsion won't form correctly. The fat from the guanciale and the pecorino must be in specific proportions to have the right melting point.
Read 17 tweets
21 Jul
Fun aside, we are indeed at a pretty important turning point, in terms of the space race. In a few years we will start seeing pictures we've never seen before, like rows of orbital launch vehicles lined up for assembly or awaiting a launch window.
Ten years. I am agnostic as to whether this will pay off in the grander scheme of things, but a number of people with mind boggling resources have decided they want to build a bunch of rockets, so whatever else may happen, we're going to be seeing bunches of rockets.
Something that comes out very strongly out of the history of aviation, is that propulsion is usually the critical step, so if you want to see who's ahead look at the engine technologies.
Read 10 tweets
20 Jul
There's a famous story that Feynman tells in one of his memoirs, of the measuring of the charge of the electron (I think, @notanastronomer ?). It's a bit embarrassing. The first pioneering measurement was say 86% of the true value, which is actually quite good.
But then the progression went something like 89%, 92%, 95%, 97%, 102%, until finally it converged on the true value. The reason its embarrassing is because you would expect the values to jump on BOTH sides of the actual value, if these were unbiased estimates.
So what seems to have happened is that after the first measurement, whenever a team was making another, if the value was say 120% (very far from the first one), the scientists would suspect they had made a mistake somewhere, check all the vacuum lines, calibrate the balance, etc
Read 13 tweets
20 Jul
My favored immigration policy for Italy would be something like picking 4 or 5 favored states for a guest worker -> "green card" (no expiry, family) -> citizenship path. It would include overhaul of the school system to accomodate these languages.
Each national community would be focused around 4 or 5 cities with schools offering a spectrum of original language-> italian instruction, with the ultimate goal of producing dual fluency.
Each community would get facilitations to build their own "Piana degli Albanesi" somewhere in the countryside, to produce whatever traditional agricultural goods can be adapted to our climate, and to serve as cultural, spiritual, and social center for their community.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(