I made this mistake after the Capitol attack. I saw changed rhetoric from prominent Trump supporters, such as Lindsey Graham, and thought “this is too big, too obviously bad, the change will stick.” It didn’t.
The lesson, as former White House aides might say: Do Not Congratulate
I made a similar mistake after Charlottesville. When Trump called neo-Nazis and neo-Confederates “very fine people,” I thought the appalled reaction would stick.
And it did with some, so I wasn’t totally wrong. But I overstated it. I was too optimistic.
link.medium.com/Y5tiFvod7hb
If making excuses for people waving literal Nazi flags didn’t do it, and a violent attack on America didn’t do it—not to mention forcibly separating children from parents—I’m left wondering if there’s any line, anything that can’t be rationalized, denied, or whatabouted away.
The Trump-Putin meeting and subsequent press conference in Helsinki is another good example.
If the US president taking Russia’s side against the US—vouching for Russia’s authoritarian leader and denigrating the US intelligence community—can be excused or dismissed, what can’t?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicholas Grossman

Nicholas Grossman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NGrossman81

24 Jul
False. The article Davis links to says so (no one captured Tucker's comms; someone under surveillance mentioned his name).
Start with a politically convenient conspiracy theory. When facts disprove it, lie that they proved it, and trust that your audience won't bother to check. Image
This isn't buried in the article Davis cites. It's the opening paragraphs.
Also, for those unfamiliar with intel processes, they can't target someone for unmasking, because they don't know who it is until after. That's what unmasking is: Revealing a name.
therecord.media/nsa-review-fin… Image
Tucker's claims smelled like BS from the jump. Intel and NatSec experts were suspicious, and even Fox wouldn't defend him.
But that's what makes these "post-truth" moves so insidious: The accusers and their target audience don't care if it's real; they care how it makes them feel
Read 4 tweets
20 Jul
The Trump 2016 campaign gave UAE and Saudi Arabia an advance copy of the candidate's energy speech, and made edits at UAE's request (via shady campaign chair Paul Manafort).
What else did he outsource to Middle Eastern autocrats, especially while POTUS?
abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump…
Thomas Barrack chaired Trump's inaugural (which is suspected of being a channel for grifting and bribes), and his indictment says he was an agent of the UAE during the Trump presidency.
How did this affect Middle East policy? Or Jared Kushner's loans?
It was apparent to many at the time that the Saudis and Emiratis had considerable influence with the Trump administration. Trump backed the misguided Qatar blockade and covered for MBS after the Saudis killed Jamal Khashoggi, among other things.
How much was flat-out corruption?
Read 5 tweets
18 Jul
Hey everyone having politicized arguments about vaccine hesitancy/refusal:
Are you sure you’re talking about the same people? Let me explain.
Broadly three categories not getting shots:
1) Ideological antivaxxers. Includes many lefty woo woo “all natural” types.
1/x
Ideological antivaxxers were committed to that position before COVID, and are probably unconvincable. If tons of studies debunking myths about vaccines and autism won’t convince them, I doubt more information about COVID-19 vaccines or public encouragement could either.
2/x
2) Hesitant. For a variety of reasons, such as lazy and don’t think it matters that much (mostly young healthy people), generally cautious, poorly informed, or distrusting of govt and other public authorities (many poor people and POC fit here).
These are the gettable ones.
3/x
Read 16 tweets
18 Jul
In a hotel that, heretofore unbeknownst to me, is hosting a bodybuilder competition. Lobby packed with all types of buff people. Some dudes look like they have to turn sideways to get through a doorway. Women in heavy stage makeup. Everyone’s tanned within an inch of their life.
Finding myself among a subculture I’m not usually a part of is one of my favorite things in life. Bonus points when it’s accidental.
Gym merch is everywhere. Bags, shirts, posters, pamphlets, booths selling stuff.
Heard one guy in an elevator say “now, time for some calories.” He never eats before competing.
Competitors mostly finishing up now, and everyone I’ve chatted with seems to enjoy that I’m interested.
Read 5 tweets
16 Jul
No, I'm not going to calm down about dangers to US democracy. It matters to me and to millions of others, and the facts warrant concern.
Look at my record and you'll see prudent warnings that mostly panned out, not hysteria or conspiracy theories.
Thread:
arcdigital.media/p/wake-up-demo…
In November 2018, after Democrats broke Republican control by winning the House in the midterms, I explored various risky future scenarios, including the possibility Trump lost in 2020, rejected the results, and tried to rile up his supporters.
medium.com/arc-digital/th…
Feb 2020, after the Senate voted against removing Trump for trying to corrupt the election with his Ukraine scheme, and AG Bill Barr intervened to give special treatment to people whose shady activity helped Trump win in 2016, I warned that he'd try more.
medium.com/arc-digital/th…
Read 8 tweets
10 Jul
The argument that we need to go back to a past time in which ideas flowed freely, when people didn't impose social sanctions in response to speech they found offensive or immoral, back before liberalism was succeeded by an illiberal ideology, is ahistorical nonsense.
Yes, but "I read about some people getting fired for really silly reasons, it looks like there's a pattern, that's bad" is quite different from claiming that Enlightenment liberalism was the dominant ideology in the West for centuries until about 2018.
Social media is new, and it's affected society in all sorts of ways. One is by facilitating deliberate, and sometimes inadvertent, pressure campaigns.
A specific claim like that I wouldn't challenge. It's the much larger, more sweeping claim I find absurd.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(