1/ This is dangerous.
“It would create a carveout in Section 230 opening social media platforms up to lawsuits for hosting health misinformation. The bill directs the HHS to issue guidelines on what should be classified as ‘health misinformation’.”
theverge.com/2021/7/22/2258…
“It would create a carveout in Section 230 opening social media platforms up to lawsuits for hosting health misinformation. The bill directs the HHS to issue guidelines on what should be classified as ‘health misinformation’.”
theverge.com/2021/7/22/2258…
2/ Several voices including myself to @MartinKulldorff to @BallouxFrancois have been slander with the label “misinformation” even though we present evidence and data based views.
This isn’t about your health or safety. It is purely about controlling you and science.
This isn’t about your health or safety. It is purely about controlling you and science.
3/ What is “official advice” often contradicts itself. Officials will change their mind or not take a position due to uncertainty. This will force regulators to take unhealthy positions. Trust will fall.
It’s “misinformation” to assume there is one voice in science and medicine.
It’s “misinformation” to assume there is one voice in science and medicine.
4/ Tell @amyklobuchar and @SenatorLujan how unAmerican and dangerous this bill is.
Increasing political control over speech has only created MORE conspiracies and radicalization. It’s been harder for rational voices to speak.
Keep politics out of science.
Increasing political control over speech has only created MORE conspiracies and radicalization. It’s been harder for rational voices to speak.
Keep politics out of science.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
