Let me tell you a story about a company whose share price has risen 50x since 1999
Compound growth of 19% for 21.5 years
Wow, a tech company?
No, a retailer
on-line?
No
Well, then they must have opened lots of stores?
At a rate of 4% per annum so 3x the store base,
2/
not 50x
So they’ve increased sales in each store?
barely changed +1.5% CAGR
Ok, a massive increase in profitability per store?
Some – grown at +4% CAGR – increased efficiencies & operating leverage of spreading the fixed costs across more stores
Still doesn’t
3/
explain the 50x growth in share price
oh I know, the share has rerated massively from a low PE to a high PE
No, gone the other way from 20x to 18x
I give up how did the share price go up 50x?
Here's a clue
Because EPS went up 55x
But you said they didn’t grow massively,
4/
you said operating income is only up 5x and it didn’t re-rate
Drumroll
Because they bought back 85% of their shares over this period
85%?
Yes
They spent every $ of the $21bn in free cash buying shares
But what about their dividend?
Nothing, zero, zilch
Why?
5/
Well think about it
If a company pays a dividend, they get nothing for it
It's like investing their profits in a 0% return opportunity
But if they buy their own shares at an attractive valuation, they're investing in a low risk, positive return opportunity
6/
without the distraction of deals & cost of fees
Plus, if they buy more when the PE is low, the return is higher – these guys regularly bought back 10% of their shares when their PE multiple was 13 / 14 so they invested at a 8% / 7% return
7/
The compounded impact over time is massive
But don’t shareholders need dividends?
Only short term shareholders
Long term shareholders surely want what’s best for the company
And that’s to invest their profits most productively
Besides, they can sell shares & create
8/
their own dividends
And buybacks are more tax-efficient for many shareholders:
- tax on dividends is higher than capital gains tax in most places
- there’s often withholdings tax on dividends for foreign shareholders
So you think companies should buyback shares and not pay
9/
dividends?
Only if their valuation is low
If you’re a tech company on a 1-2% free cash flow yield, don’t bother – who wants to invest at those rates?
they only do it to offset their employees cashing in options and increasing the share count and are then "dishonest" and
10/
exclude these buybacks to offset dilution from employee compensation in their FCF calcs
So European banks on 0.4x book value?
Ditch the divi and buyback stock
What about cyclicals?
If they buyback when prices are high, it offsets the EPS decline in the down cycle and
11/
accelerates growth in the next upcycle
Conclusion
You don’t need to invest in the fastest-growing businesses for great returns, you just need a good business with a great management team, who really understand capital allocation
What's the company?
Autozone - AZO US
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In October 2003, one of the World’s wealthiest men flew home in his Gulfstream
As he disembarked, he was arrested at gunpoint, sent to a remote prison beyond reach of journalists, charged with tax evasion, & spent the next 10 yrs in a Siberian gulag
He is
2/
Mikhail Khodorkovsky (MK), the CEO of Yukos, one of the world’s largest oil companies at the time
But unfortunately for MK & Yukos, this wasn’t a televised Olympic Judo contest where a neck lock ends with a double tap
This was an: out of sight, zero-rules, cage fight
3/
against an angry, Russian Bear
With only one winner
the Bear
who levied $30bn of tax charges against Yukos,
disembowelled their key assets at rigged auctions,