Through his reporting on critical race theory over the past year, @realchrisrufo has established himself as one of the most influential GOP activists today. But is there any reason to trust him as a journalist?
Rather than make a thread highlighting all the individual debunkings in this article (there are far too many for that to be practicable), I'm going to post links to further debunkings that it doesn't cover. Starting with Rufo's "briefing book" on CRT:
Another classic lie; gotta love the Nazis' favorite trope tying communism to a scapegoated race who's coming to steal the white man's property and destroy his civilization!
Explaining why it is not an exaggeration to say that the video contains literal neo-Nazi conspiracy theories, irrespective of whether Rufo intends to spread them
Here is a good set of tweets where Rufo openly admits his disregard for truth and strategy of bad faith manipulation of language. Can we stop taking him seriously now, media? Please?
This is the best documentary I've seen in years. Director @gocjhunt strikes a perfect balance between playful mockery and grim realism in assessing the dangerous persistence of white supremacist mythology-as-history.
I didn't learn about the existence of this mythology-as-history in high school; in fact the first time I ever came across the idea was a few weeks ago. Suddenly things made a lot more sense.
This is followed by an explanation of the crucial role played by women in the United Daughters of the Confederacy, chiefly in institutionalizing the Lost Cause narrative in school curricula, some of which survived through the '70s
"The left does not have an explanation for Asian American achievement from a critical race theory lens." The left also lacks an explanation of the pancreas from a critical race theory lens. Theories have specific purposes.
Oh GOd. You'll never guess who authored the foreword. Rhymes with Shmimmy Momcepts.
According to @ConceptualJames, CRT accuses Asian Americans of being "model minorities," "white-adjacent," or just "white." And CRT alleges that Asians "push to succeed" bc of their anti-Blackness and desire to maintain their white (or yellow (Jesus, dude)) privilege
Holy shit. Rufo is either actually remarkably stupid or has even less faith in his audience’s will to think for themselves than I thought.
Crenshaw is lamenting this fact, not endorsing it. This is beyond obvious from reading the essay.
At the very least this tweet reveals Rufo did not subject his interpretation to even the slightest amount of questioning. This reading of Crenshaw would entail that Shelby Steele, Charles Murray, and Bo Winegard are critical race theorists.
Seriously, read the article. Crenshaw (@sandylocks) does not mince words. Her observations ring even truer today:
“Make no mistake about it: We are in a full-scale race-baiting campaign. It is well-organized, and it could be effective if we fail to mine the lessons [of history]”
Crenshaw getting to the heart of the issue: ignorance. It is this ignorance that engenders complacency as the norm for otherwise progressive people when it comes to racial justice in the US.
And that ignorance is no accident. Those who benefit most under the status quo have absolutely no interest in teaching the next generation facts about their nation's history that might lead them to endorse a radical restructuring of the socioeconomic order.
And this must all be situated within the reform-retrenchment dialectic of our history. Antiracist efforts are demonized in order to justify White anti-democratic control.
It’s plain. Today’s attacks on critical race theory aren’t meant to rebut its main arguments. They’re meant to paint it with such broad brushstrokes that any basic effort to reckon with the causes and impact of racism in our society can be demonized and dismissed.