In 20-21, Pepe played 32.6 90s, up slightly from his first year at Arsenal, but still down from Lille. He struggled in year one to match his output from his last year in France, as you'd expect after a league change. But year two saw bounces back in goalscoring and shooting.
One area Pepe did not improve last year -- assists. His assists/90 were halved, and his xA were down by about 30 percent. He absolutely needs to do better finding his teammates and creating chances, but here's reason to be encouraged that he can.
In 20-21, Pepe got off to an incredibly slow start. In league play, he started four games of the first 19. In those minutes -- four shot-creating actions. But Jan. 26 on, Pepe started 12 times and created 33 shots -- almost three per 90. Improvement, but still room to grow.
Here's a narrative against Pepe: The team doesn't win with him. At first glance, it's true! Among players with significant playing time, only Pepe and Bellerin had negative xG +/- last year. 😳
But consider this: Pepe made 16 starts.
In 11 starts with at least one of ESR/Saka in the lineup:
19 points, 18 goals, 13.7 xG, +2.2xGD
5 starts without either of them:
2 points, 2 goals, 4.2 xG, -3.9xGD
Pepe's multiple starts with Nketiah, Willock, Willian tanked his +/-.
As I've covered for @LeGrove, Pepe was DIFFERENT after the ESR switch. His KP/90, npxG+A, xgChain and xgBuildup all doubled or got close to that.
One area of note for Pepe: his dribbling. He was prolific at Lille, converting 121 dribbles at a 60.2 percent rate of success. Year one at Arsenal: 87 with a 54.4 percent rate. Three players topped that number this year. Last year: 61, at a 45.5 rate. He can do better.
One more area to be encouraged: Pepe's non-attacking contributions are getting better. Even as a breakout star at Lille, he only contributed 1 tkl+int per 90. He upped that to 1.77 with Arsenal, and then again to 2.18 per 90 last year.
Pre Jan. 26, Pepe started four times and completed 6 tackles+interceptions, 1.5 per 90. In his last 12 starts? 27. If he can keep that up, and keep working to make better passes than early last season, there's a good chance he can earn Arteta's trust and have a great year.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK, lots of interest in the Odegaard thread from earlier, so...let's make it head-to-head! (1/x)...
I noted that Arsenal recorded 1.89 points per match in Odegaard's 9 starts.
In the Prem, Maddison has 88 starts the past three seasons. Leicester have recorded 140 points in those matches. = 1.59 per.
Without JM? 26 matches, 40 points. =1.54 points per.
Next, key passes! Going pace-based here, but keep in mind Maddison has a LOT more appearances in the Prem. MØ's pace last year would have put him between 60-70 KPs. Maddison's last three years:
52
84
95
Should #Arsenal sign Martin Odegaard? A quick statistical detour...
No causation/correlation line here, but MØ was undoubtedly part of the turnaround. The club registered 17 points in his 9 PL starts, 1.89 per. Arsenal put up 44 points in its other 29 matches, 1.51 per match.
The latter pace would have gotten them 11th over a full season.
Odegaard's league starts included wins over Leeds, Tottenham and Chelsea, but he did also start the 0-3 drubbing to Liverpool (Xhaka, Luiz and Saka all missed) and the 1-1 draw to Burnley, one of Arsenal's worst finishing performances of the season.