Share this page!

Aaron Maté Profile picture
Twitter logo
26 Jul, 4 tweets, 3 min read
The expert sources I speak to are confident that we will not see *any* debunk efforts, just whining on social media. They're confident in the professionalism & accuracy of your study, which makes me confident too.
Happy to be proven wrong. Study is here: rootclaim-media.s3.amazonaws.com/syria2013evide…
As predicted, there will only be whining on social media. To illustrate, this THREAD from regime change troll @im_PULSE cites three old articles -- all written by himself (😂). None address or refute this study and the reporting that bolsters it.
This thread does however continue one of my favorite media sub-genres: people with zero journalism accomplishments thinking that they have grounds to scold and dismiss the reporting of Seymour Hersh.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Aaron Maté

Aaron Maté Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aaronjmate

Aaron Maté Profile picture
26 Jul
New @PushbackShow: A new open-source study concludes that Syrian insurgents carried out the Ghouta sarin chemical attack in August 2013 -- not the Syrian government, as the US and other Western sources publicly alleged.
Based on their trajectories, the study traces all 7 missile impact locations back to the most likely launch spot where they all intersected: a small area within insurgent-controlled territory. A video of insurgents firing Volcano rockets matches several features of that field.
The study finds major errors in reports from the UN, Human Rights Watch and the NATO troll farm Bellingcat that were used to pin the blame on the Syrian government. Most importantly, it provides new evidence that the US gov't put out false or unsupported claims to blame Syria.
Read 10 tweets
Aaron Maté Profile picture
22 Jul
.@martinchulov's new Guardian article promoting more NATO-led sadism against Syria is titled "Syrian economy lies in ruins and China sniffs opportunity."

"China sniffs opportunity"? Who comes up with this sick stuff?
The article consists of cowardly, petulant "diplomats" hiding behind anonymity & state-funded "experts" trying to discourage China from helping Syria rebuild from the Dirty War. These sadists are livid that Syria could possibly try to rebuild what the US & friends destroyed.
"Syria is a poor investment for them."

"rebuilding infrastructure is not profitable at all."

"this regime has gone to extraordinary lengths to convince the entire world that Syria is just a terrible business proposition."

No mention that US sanctions target reconstruction.
Read 4 tweets
Aaron Maté Profile picture
18 Jul
New evidence ties Jaysh-al-Islam -- the Saudi-funded "rebel" death squad involved in the staged chemical attack in Douma -- to the abduction and disappearance of Syrian lawyer and activist Razan Zaitouneh. dw.com/en/exclusive-h…
Two months her Dec. 2013 abduction, "a member of Jaish al-Islam accessed his social media accounts via a computer given to Zaitouneh and Khalil by a US State Department-funded program." The US gov't then traced the computer to a JAI prison in Douma.
The fact that Zaitouneh had a US gov't-supplied computer suggests that they were working together in some capacity. In any event, why didn't the US make this publicly known? Were they covering up for Jaysh-al-Islam, one of the key "rebel" groups in the Dirty War?
Read 8 tweets
Aaron Maté Profile picture
29 Jun
I want to thank voices who not only covered but also criticized the McCarthyite TYT smear campaign against me & @jimmy_dore. To my surprise, more established lefty voices stayed silent. I appreciate @jacksonhinklle @vanguard_pod @LeeCamp @HardLensMedia for filling the void.
The fact that the US just bombed Syria & US troops are occupying it (along with imposing murderous sanctions) should underscore that it's derelict for left media to avoid it -- & avoid speaking out when those who do cover it are slandered for challenging the establishment line.
And the fact that no one took seriously the weaponization of MeToo to slander Jimmy (and cover-up for the slander of me) -- for a joke that he apologized for 7 years ago -- doesn't mean that it wasn't shameful, and worthy of condemnation. TYT's behavior shouldn't be tolerated.
Read 6 tweets
Aaron Maté Profile picture
28 Jun
Why is Biden putting US troops in harm's way in Syria? It's the question we're not supposed to ask -- and media never does -- but our leaders have made it plain. Trump said we're there for the oil; Biden official Dana Stroul has said US troops are "leverage" for Dirty War goals.
Biden official Dana Stroul in 2019: via military occupation, the US "owns" Syria’s "resource-rich" "economic powerhouse" region. That is "leverage for affecting the the overall political process for the broader Syrian conflict."
Read @BenjaminNorton of @TheGrayzoneNews on how
a top Biden official once bragged that the US military "owns" one-third of Syria, and uses that region as "leverage." This is why US troops are under rocket fire now.
thegrayzone.com/2019/11/05/us-…
Read 4 tweets
Aaron Maté Profile picture
23 Jun
I told @ryangrim that, if he really believes Pat/TYT claims that OPCW whistleblowers (and me) are wrong, The Intercept should commission him to write its -- and Pat's -- first story on the OPCW leaks, & show why.

Here's Pat preemptively declining the opportunity. I wonder why?
Pat's excuse is that TI "already covered Douma in depth + their reporting debunked Henderson’s idea that canisters didn’t fall from the sky."

Except TI has done ZERO reporting on OPCW's Douma leaks, including Henderson's study. So TI "debunked" something it hasn't mentioned? 🤡
It never stops being hilarious that people who have done zero reporting on the OPCW cover-up -- or in @ryangrim's case, work for an "adversarial" that has ignored it -- claim some grounds to try to minimize it. No wonder they refuse to back up their views in writing.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @aaronjmate has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @aaronjmate!

Read all threads by @aaronjmate

:(