Jeff Bezos comes as close as any real person I've seen to a genuine James Bond villain. The megalomaniac fantasies, the maniacal laugh, the sense of something unfulfilled, unsettled, out of joint with himself, that drives him to such excesses of greed and display.
Thread/
But far from calling out this cackling maniac, drowning under his own hat, much of the world's media - even those he doesn't own - grovel before him. Governments give him everything he asks for. In the real world, Bond would work for Blofeld.
The fantasy of space colonisation is almost exclusively male. In the form Bezos proposes, it is impossible, for a number of sound physical reasons. But this doesn't stop millions of men from wistfully imagining the delightful orbiting prison colony they might one day inhabit.
What appears to be an imaginative exercise in fact betrays a profound lack of imagination: a failure to imagine the power relations, confinement and extreme constraint involved, were this fantasy magically to materialise.
If you were to suggest to these people that they should never be allowed to leave their homes, on pain of death, they would be outraged. But this is what they wish on themselves. It's a bizarre and highly destructive fantasy, and it's time we all grew out of it.
We are blessed to live on the planet on which we evolved, with its oxygen, radiation screening, atmospheric pressure and 1g of gravity. Even if we found another planet capable of supporting life, we'll never find one so perfectly suited to *human* life.
Yet the attempts to realise this juvenile, preposterous boy's own fantasy, with the massive quantities of materials and fuel they require, further threaten the only habitable planet we have.
We have barely begun to understand the wonders of nature on this astonishing planet. The more we discover, the more mind-blowing life turns out to be. Yet some people would swap it for .... nothing. Literally, nothing. They are dead to the world.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why is this legal? It sounds like the work of a trammel netter, knocking out the long-lived species crucial to marine foodwebs. The fishing industry's mass destruction of our beautiful ecosystems has to stop. walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-new…
The ratio of destruction to production of some of these fishing operations is off the scale. It's possible that the person who killed all those sharks didn't even fill a fish box with their target species, or take home any fish at all.
Our governments allow the fishing industry to treat our seas as a free-for-all. The result is cascading ecological collapse, as ancient biological structures on the seabed and big, slow-growing species are destroyed en masse. It's heartbreaking.
Imagine an oil executive making self-serving and misleading claims about renewable energy in Radio Times.
Then imagine BBC TV giving him a primetime platform every week to promote his own industry. msn.com/en-gb/foodandd…
This is where we are with @BBCCountryfile, which makes no attempt to balance its coverage of livestock farming, one of the world’s most damaging industries.
Balance?
Impartiality?
Every week it drives a coach and horses through the BBC’s editorial guidelines.
Is there any other kind of BBC programme making in which industrial lobbyists are given primetime slots, week in, week out, to promote their industry, without any challenge or attempt at balance?
Any reasonable conception of freedom holds that we should be free to do as we wish, up to, but not beyond, the point at which we cause harm to other people.
In other words, it does not include the freedom to spread a deadly virus.
Over the years, great efforts have been made to promote a different conception of freedom: "I can do what the hell I like, regardless of the impact on anyone else".
They call it libertarianism. I call it being a selfish arse.
Of course, in this conception, "I" does not mean "you". Those who scream about their own, absolute, freedoms tend to be the first to deny freedoms to others, be they asylum seekers, protesters, Gypsies etc, as you can see in the current Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill.
For 20 years, the billionaire press told us "we can easily adapt to a warmer world".
Try telling that to people in Germany, Belgium and the western seaboard of North America.
And this is just one degree of heating.
The media did this, as surely as the fossil fuel companies.
Let's not forget those who told us there was little to worry about. People with massive media platforms, who helped push us towards catastrophe.
Matt Ridley
Bjorn Lomborg
Nigel Lawson
Christopher Booker
David Rose
Peter Hitchens ....
The roll of dishonour is long and grim
And, of course, their editors and proprietors.
And the so-called thinktanks shilling for the fossil fuel companies.
Doubtless they all believed they were being ever so clever. But if we recall their names at all, we'll remember them as traitors to humanity.
So here are the key takeaways from #Rivercide. 1. We're rightly disgusted by the privatised water companies, cutting their costs by dumping raw sewage into our rivers.
But revolting and extreme as this is, it’s NOT the primary cause of river pollution in the UK.
Thread/
2. So what is? The answer will surprise many people.
Farming.
There are several reasons: soil erosion, fertilisers, pesticides etc.
But the most extreme cause is this: industrial livestock units.
The problem is simply stated: they produce too much dung for the land to absorb.
3. They gather nutrients from a large area and release them into a small one. Modern chicken farms, for example, channel soya from vast areas of Brazil and Argentina into huge numbers of birds in industrial units. The nutrients in their dung are spread on the surrounding land.
All my working life, I’ve wanted to fight the forces trashing the living world. I’ve wanted to fight them in the most powerful medium, television. Instead, I’ve found myself fighting TV executives, who for 36 years have nixed almost every proposal I’ve made.
Doubtless unwittingly, they stand guard in front of the corporations and governments destroying our life support systems, ensuring that journalists can very seldom make the hard-hitting exposes required to hold them to account.
They appear to be terrified of the kind of kinetic, campaigning, investigative journalism I want to do. And their fear seems to make them furious. The treatments I’ve written seem to press a button, which makes them shout and swear and dismiss them out of hand.