The full [completely crazy] argument appears to be that Pelosi allowed the insurrection to happen because it would benefit her politically.

Riiiight. Victims generally allow themselves to be brutally attacked because they know it will make their attackers look bad. [sarcasm]🙄
This is what will circulate on right wing media.

People outside of the right wing media bubble need to understand how off-the-rails insane this party has become.

What kind of a mind can even think that up?
After the insurrection, they mede the decision to shield Trump because he controls the "base" and without his "base" they can't win primaries.

Some of them believe every word of this.
Others have made a cynical and ugly political calculation.
I agree. There is evidence that he might not.

Another way to see it is that once they've shielded Trump in any manner whatsoever, they're stuck because the anti-Trump people will never accept them, so they have no choice but to double down on crazy.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

29 Jul
Here's how sociologists describe what's happening.

The scholarship cited is here: asanet.org/authentic-appe…

A "crisis of legitimacy" [a group no longer believes the government is legitimate] happens when . . .

1/
🔹One or more social groups experience a “representation crisis” because the political establishment doesn't appear to govern on its behalf, or

🔹An incumbent group experiences a “power-devaluation crisis” when the political establishment appears to favor . . .

2/
. . . new social groups over established groups.

That's fancy language for "they don't like the fact that Blacks, women, and other minorities are moving into positions of power."

When groups don't believe the political establishment has legitimacy, they seek to destroy it.

3/
Read 7 tweets
28 Jul
It's also bad news for Trump, who no doubt planned to make the same argument.

(The defense is that the speech these guys gave on Jan. 6 was within the scope of their employment so they're entitled to the DOJ defending them. The DOJ said nope.)
Here's the document: s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2101…
The DOJ is calling his activities "campaigning and electioneering," which isn't part of his duties as a Congressman.

Also "it is no part of the business of the United States to pick sides among candidates in federal elections."

🔥
Actually, Trump did make the same argument in this case.

The 14th Amendment (which says that any elected officials who incite insurrection can not run again for office) creates an interesting loop.

If they are guilty of what they're charged with, the DOJ can't defend them.
Read 5 tweets
25 Jul
Republican Lawbreaking

Have you noticed that Republicans don't mind if their leaders break laws?

In fact, conviction can be a badge of honor in the fight against “liberal corruption.” h/t @michaelscherer
washingtonpost.com/powerpost/crim…

Here, I explain why:
1/ I’ll post a transcript shortly. (Having technical difficulties.)

Republican crimes (and criminology in general) is a huge topic, but here are a few thoughts.

I’ve been tweeting about a lot of this, but I think laying it out this way helps me explain it better.
2/ Putting the blame where the blame belongs: Turns out, it wasn't a technical difficulty. It was me being a computer dork. (No! It was keyboard gremlins making mischief!)

Here's the transcript: terikanefield.com/republican-law…
Read 21 tweets
20 Jul
What a coincidence! Thomas Barrack, another Trump “advisor” and chair of the Presidential Inaugural Committee has been arrested and charged with acting as a foreign agent.

context-cdn.washingtonpost.com/notes/prod/def….

This isn't actually a FARA violation. It's worse.

1/
22 USC 611 (FARA) is a documentary requirement and (if you lie) can carry a 5-year sentence.

Barrack was charged with the "espionage lite" statute for people working on behalf of a foreign power: law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18…
This one carries up to a 10-year penalty.

2/
One reason I said, "what a coincidence" is that this week I'm writing about Republican lawbreaking.

But who the heck can keep up?

3/
Read 9 tweets
20 Jul
I haven't really wanted to weigh into this, but the idea that people commit crimes because they think (or know) they won't be held accountable does not hold up to the research on deterrence and punishment.

1/
I can dig up the research on whether punishment actually works as a deterrent. I don't have it at my fingertips, but I've written about it.

About this administration not holding "anyone" accountable, who is bringing all those charges against the insurrectionists?

2/
One of the pillars of democracy is prosecutorial discretion.

You can read about it here: findlaw.com/criminal/crimi…

I have spent much of my professional life frustrated at the charges prosecutors choose to bring. As a defense lawyer, I've rarely agreed.

3/
Read 9 tweets
18 Jul
Here I expanded on some ideas I tweeted about this week:
🔹Are we too far gone?
🔹Will the GOP succeed in unraveling 100 years of progress?
🔹Sadopopulism

I did something different in this video. I’m not on the screen; instead, you can read the text.
You don’t get to see my pretty green office, but this was a lot easier for me to put together.

I put the transcription on my blog, here: terikanefield.com/are-we-too-far…
I expanded on this thread, adding more reasons people (well, Democrats and people left-of-center) who are following politics closely often feel panic and despair.

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(