1/ Imagine you told a progressive in the summer of 2020 that a year from now, Biden would:
- Pull out of Afghanistan
- Pull out of Iraq
- Get a monthly child tax subsidy to every parent
- Push a $1.2 trillion infrastructure plan
- Have 70% of adults vaccinated by August '21
2/
- Revoke the Keystone XL pipeline
- End the military trans ban
- Get $1,400 checks to most Americans
- Install more judges in 6 months than anyone since Nixon
What do they do? Laugh in your face
3/ I really can't wrap my head around it. Since day 1, progs have just been seething over Biden and almost entirely critical of his admin. Somehow he's managed to be the most progressive president yet while maintaining a facade that he's "ruling from the middle"
4/ Obama's admin talked a lot after his presidency about how bad they were at messaging their accomplishments to the base. Trump was incredible at this: every Trump voter knew exactly what he got done. Biden may very well be worse than Obama. I didn't think that was possible...
END/ I know from a progressive PoV there's always more for the govt to do. But the goalposts have moved so much it's incomprehensible. A year ago, none of the hardcore progressive critics of Biden would have ever believed you if you read them that record. But it's almost reality.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ This month, my @SubstackInc newsletter @TangleNews broke 25,000 free readers and 4,000 paying subscribers. I follow a lot of threads about newsletters & growth, and noticed that I've done this differently than other writers have. This is my advice about the advice I ignored:
2/ First, I write a daily, and I ignored the ubiquitous advice to do 1 or 2 newsletters free and paywall the rest each week. Instead, I write 4 free newsletters and put one newsletter behind a paywall. Why? Because I never know which one is going to take off!
3/ From my perspective, the more content available to the masses the more shots I have at bringing in new readers. Several times, I’ve unlocked subscriber-only content that was really popular just to get more eyes on it — and then usef that content as an advertisement. It works.
1/ You know, the more I read about all this misinformation on Covid-19 vaccines, the more I actually think @Facebook is doing a pretty good job addressing it. And I think folks still blaming them for vaccine hesitancy are missing the plot.
2/ I'm not one to defend Facebook. I have plenty of issues with them as a corporation, their role in the news industry's demise, Zuck as a person, etc. But...
3/ I found the company’s blog post responding to the Biden administration pretty damn compelling. 85% of its U.S. users have been or want to be vaccinated. It’s literally facilitating vaccinations with guides to get people the shot. about.fb.com/news/2021/07/s…
There are *43* open voter fraud investigations in Texas, according to the REPUBLICAN attorney general. Just one of them is from the 2020 election, where 11 million Texans voted! TX Republicans continue to 'solve' a problem that is non-existent. readtangle.com/p/texas-republ…
Some TX lawmakers have said there are "400 voter fraud" cases. That's not true. There are 386 "pending investigations," but that's before any criminal charges are even filed. And guess what? Even if every single one of those 386 investigations turned into cases and convictions...
That would *still* be less than 400 cases of voter fraud in a state with 11 million voters, where there's a one million dollar prize for reporting fraud and whole teams dedicated to finding it. How is this proof we need an overhaul of the system there? houstonchronicle.com/politics/texas…
1/ This is a truly bizarre, down is up, up is down, thread. Obviously I'm a biased Substack writer, but it's not a "threat" to traditional news media. It's a compliment. It works with it, and it's a strong addition to the landscape. Calling it a "threat to journalism" is absurd.
2/ Most obvious is the fact that many "traditional" media outlets are incentivized in all the wrong ways: traffic, ad revenue, clicks, and corporate sponsors. Being supported by subscribers is not a cloak - it's actual freedom.
3/ Also, imagine in this moment for media actually tweeting this:
This is hilarious. Rep. Eric Swalwell referred to "G-d herself" and triggered all these ridiculous, over-the-top reactions about G-d's gender... when gendering G-d is actually a totally reasonable, in-bounds debate in church and synagogue and has been for literally centuries.
He "mocks truth intentionally by misgendering G-d" like... the Hebrew Bible from 2,000 years ago? Or the Episcopal Church from 600 years ago? ncronline.org/news/theology/…
Any learned religious person would hear Swalwell say "G-d herself" and not be surprised at all given that it's actually a robust debate in pretty much every religious community. So if you see someone having a meltdown over it, just know that they are telling on themselves!