A thread on Twitter abuse....when I spoke up in Science, with many colleagues, about the #conservation risks of banning trophy hunting (TH) without better options ready, I was totally naive about the backlash, especially on social media. Instructive to look at a little of it 1/12
There are common themes - the first is that anyone who speaks up must be corrupt. I had media coverage of our 0.8% of historic funding from TH orgs - hugely outweighed by funding from groups against TH, but why let truth get in the way of a good story? 2/12
Another common element, trying to tag or approach supporters/donors/employers to try to force them to distance from you. Total disregard for how this could affect real conservation work on the ground, of course, & happily we have great supporters so has not worked... 3/12
Another constant theme is the idea that we are puppets for the 'powerful TH lobby' and somehow 'alleged' conservationists, not real ones voicing our own, informed opinions - guess the real explanation is too threatening? 4/12
The lies (I really don't trash anyone on Twitter, even when sorely tempted!) & false binaries are extremely common - you have to be pro or anti TH, corrupt or pure, & conservationists apparently can't accept realities like killing. A real hatred of grey areas & realities...5/12
Some of it is just nasty abuse - here someone incorrectly labels me an ignorant killer, and 'wishes me the worst' - which charmingly gets multiple likes and retweets....6/12
Another example here, this is all too common, and often with sexist abuse thrown in for good measure....7/12
Sometimes people go as far as mocking up images and pretending they are you, trying to discredit you and your conservation work......alarming, particularly as there are quite a few of these.....8/12
Quite a few stray into threats of violence, some more overtly than others. This person would like to see lions 'play' with me, I have had plenty of people suggest worse....and so have colleagues 9/12
Not all bad - lovely when people try to speak out against this, though then they often get abuse as well 10/12
Overall all a bit depressing - we should be able to have informed & even controversial debates without abuse. I get asked if it is worth it, & the answer is always yes. We cannot be silenced by lies & abuse, speaking up for evidence based conservation is crucial. 11/12
But having said that, it sometimes requires quite a lot of wine to get through the nonsense - and sharing experiences with @AdamHartScience@Nikolaj_Bi@nscscience & many others who go through the same. Cheers to you all!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People often ask me why so much of what I post is about trophy hunting, rather than other topics to do with #lions & #conservation. So a short thread on why I engage heavily with this issue - much as I would rather not! (1/n)
Firstly - and sadly, it is the 'threat' that gets far & away the most media attention, despite being one of the lowest-ranked threats to lions according to experts, & the fact it can also have clear benefits, esp habitat conservation. So stressing facts really matters here (2/n)
Here, to remind people, is the graph from a recent paper on key threats to lions. I wish beyond measure that NGOs, the media, public & politicians would focus on some of these key threats, like habitat loss & conflict, but it is all about trophy hunting (TH), so here we are (3/n)
@ZacGoldsmith either you didn't read the evidence submitted, or are sharing #misinformation based on a personal ideology - either option is shocking. Here is our submitted evidence again, perhaps others could weigh in & reshare theirs too, so you have it? lionlandscapes.org/post/lion-land…
Meanwhile we also wrote a very extensive & detailed report, commissioned by @RoryStewartUK when he was Minister, on the topic of lion trophy hunting, showing conservation costs & benefits. I shared this with @ZacGoldsmith in person but here it is once more wildcru.org/news/new_repor…